https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/
On 'anti-vax' labelling:
I choose not to vaccinate, but I do not accept the 'anti' or 'denialist' smear of negatively defined intent for myself, or for others who are of like mind. Other people can and will call you whatever they choose to. That is their choice. I live mine.
To define our self in terms of a perceived evil is to give it primacy.
When Jesus says 'resist ye not evil' he didn't mean be a doormat! He meant align wholly in truth - instead of reactively giving focus to what we say we do NOT want and THEN seeking power in its framework. I don't support the idea of vaccination as a safe and effective or optimal way to pre-empt disease - but more importantly, I refuse mandatory or coercive vaccination agenda as violation of core freedoms over our bodies - and on human experimentation - and call for transparency and accountability to independent scientific oversight as to actual efficacies and adversities.
Deceit always tempts us into self-betrayal by emotionally reacting to suggestion. Don't be phished. If we choose the word that we give and receive in alignment with the integrity of our being. Then we are more aligned in witnessing for integrity on behalf of all, rather and aiming at a disintegrity seen in others as 'enemy' - who then find easy justification in treating us as 'threat'. If vaccination IS so safe and effective - why not open it to scientific verification?
Notice that any crusading War on 'something' - whatever the 'something' is - always works to fund its protection under guise of fighting the good fight or saving the world. This is a funding of energy, support and sacrifice in a focus directed to 'Seek but do NOT find - or promise but do not deliver.
Those who live in self-illusion or wishful and fearful belief, depend on or are driven by fear and division, in self-interest as they define themselves in the frame of fear of loss of possession and control. And we can all find a part of that in our own mind if not in specific behaviours.
So what I call out as vaccine error is set in fear seeking protection, under a lack of scientific veracity, being protected from accountability by globally directed transnational corporate power that has every intention of using vaccines for its agenda - whatever its proponents at various levels may believe that is. Soldiers, generals and politicians all have different narratives - as do the bankers behind the scenes. WHO is really looking after your interests?
The pattern of this kind of thinking has expanded out into a tyranny of pervasive mind control and undermining of natural rights across a spectrum of human endeavour. I put my focus on the underlying pattern of thinking, of which a vaccine agenda is an example. But it is often impossible to get anyone to notice that they are deceived - by the way the belief protects itself with the status of truth and protection. However a dissonance from a groupthink consensus allows others to recognise that are other ways of thinking and seeing - and in that our demeanour will either speak to others of activate their defences.
Belief in vaccination claims to supply immunity by replacing it with external manual managements that have consequences in pain and loss, that escalates as a burden of costs, and yet interprets its failures as the need to intensify vaccinating - as more and more of them are needing more and more boosters, while denial operates any public willingness to own its own true account or allow independent scientific oversight or corporate liability under the law.
I see a marrying of those who demand protection by rote of belief, and those who present themselves as certainty of protection - and in their freedom of choice is a larger education in choice and consequence at a more collective level. In other words it may be later generations who have to pick up the consequence of a mistaken policy given authoritative support.
But the 'herd immunity' narrative works to override all individual freedom of consent - informed or otherwise - for a mandated 'collectivism' under a controlling mandate. This is pernicious and vile in its deceit, and suppresses other approaches with regard to vitality, immunity, nursed fever as a healing that would result from a true education rather than an indoctrination.
Anyone researching history rather than repeated beliefs can immediately uncover that vaccination came AFTER the disease incidence was reduced right down due to sanitation, living conditions, nutrition etc.
With the Internet increasingly being used as the means to erase and remake history we enter an 'Internment of Things' for carbon-units. Humanity will become as able to free itself as any of the animal stock we keep for food - but privilege within the prison is given to those who sell out on their own kind.
However - as I said - giving focus to what we do NOT want can become the way we give it embodiment in spite of and because of our fears. I see a fundamental choice that we each are faced with, that the world's thinking has always worked to keep hidden.
You have to decide for yourself whether you accept the voice for fear as the framer, driver and determiner of your life. Once you see that that IS what it is, does it speak for You?
Because the mind is of Mind and is not irrevocably set - the choice to be someone you are NOT, cannot ever become true - but it can represent your refusal to recognise, accept and appreciate who you really are. Fear cannot give you rest - but only a bubble of a seeming escape that will not abide however much is sacrificed for its sustainability.
Eventually the heart gives way under the strain - even if the organ itself persists.
