David:
Why are a lot of infected people asymptotic? Do they have particularly healthy endothelia? And where does vitamin D fit into this hypothesis? * (see below for my response to this)
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick: (to David)
Because they have a good immune system and bat the virus away before it can do any damage.
To Malcolm:
This almost suggests a 'bad' immune system and 'naughty' viruses.
Why not allow a functioning immune system to be where natural viral response IS immune function, rather than where a ‘detoxing episode’ becomes framed as a 'life threatening pathogen'?
In this I assign such 'sickness' a role within health rather than as a source of fear and control for human (psychic-emotional and social-medical) interventions and impositions.
As well as toxicity is strain. Constant strain is a great burden on the resources and an episode of sickness can in effect force a rest that may save not just a stitch in time, but an MI - Heart attack.
Our accepted model is the context for our perceiving and reacting to our world.
The game of 'whack-a-mole is an attempt to 'make it go away' - and in a short term need - may be called for. You may want to allay a cold onset so as to deliver the speech you have been invited and paid - and travelled to deliver. On the other hand you may be glad of an excuse not to have to attend a function that is compelled, meaningless and onerous.
My health changed radically when I became self employed within a sense of meaning and challenge that aligned me in joy in life. Great strain can be the 'normal' of a life never able to really happen.
The more we want something to 'go away' the more defences are set against it - normalised as structures that we lose the capacity to even imagine changing - while the 'pesky moles' take on more dissonance as a systemic breakdown that of course calls up systemic means to batten down or bat away feared conflict.
Feared conflict then becomes the systemic replacement for what consciousness once navigated with a sense of wholeness.
In my reading today I encountered research that states consciousness has been steadily decreasing - my own explanation being that of constant normalise strain of defences against unresolved conflict. I duck-goed 'Gert Gerken' as the reference to what is in my printed book:
snip/
The researchers at GRP now feel that over the past twenty-five years the brain of the
average individual has undergone significant changes in its organization. The decrease in
sensitivity to sensory stimuli implies that stimuli are being processed
in a different way than before. Researchers hypothesize that there are fewer cross linkag-
es or networks in the brain; therefore primarily optical stimuli go directly to
the optical center without activating other sensory or emotional centers. Thus
human beings can take in very powerful stimuli that are discordant, senseless, or
contradictory without being bothered. The trend researcher Gert Gerken has
labeled this phenomenon "the new indifference."
/snip
I note that this pattern applies no less to Science.
How normal are we willing to be?
'Whatever!' ?
Redesignating human being as an infection status that must subjugate its own life to protect a 'herd' that HAS no individual expression - excepting of course those who design and run the model. We used to call it the rat race, and seek to escape, but now it is more of a global experiment on human lab rats in which our safety is their paramount concern. (!)
Language structures the mind. "Watch it, you!" - If you value having one.
Awareness of the world around us may be too painful to bear - but may also facilitate recognising and releasing model frameworks that invisibly lock down and mask conflict into the body Corporate such as to protect a caged bubble from upset and offence.
David:
Why are a lot of infected people asymptotic? Do they have particularly healthy endothelia? And where does vitamin D fit into this hypothesis?
Because the term ‘infection’ is being abused. There are innumerable latent virus and bacterial functions within you at any given time. Are you thus a walking time bomb of contagion that could go off amidst an protected status of susceptibility that is in fact a likewise diverse Biotic synergy?(“Life Jim, but not as we know it”).
‘Asymptomatic infected people’ means ‘healthy people’.
Medicalising life as a source of profit and control works by framing health, life and nature in terms of an evil to eradicate, control, and manage – rather than Be and share in.
Its a technological version of St George that has in effect become the evil or chaos he thought to subdue.
Generally – life is a workability – excepting that it loses the ability to create workarounds to blocks, scarcities and conflicts that don’t resolve and operate as blocks, toxicities, imbalances and insufficiencies.
Allowing that a lot of iatrogenic and environmental stress or exposure is the result of unresolved human (relational) conflicts, we are effectively poisoning our own nest – perhaps most insidiously under the guise of boosting or manually taking over our ‘immune function’ (life).
Vit D has such a massive role within health (immune function) as to ask why did we agree to lockdown into hypothesis that framed us out of our natural environment of common sense health and fitness for a medicalised weakness demanding mass sacrifice of individual liberty – or else be assigned the status of virus by a Medical State?
The recent events are only closing the door on a herd that had already been domesticated and branded – bar a bit of shouting and some bio-technical track and tracery.
