Psychic-Emotional Conflict Is Dis-Ease

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/03/17/what-causes-heart-disease-part-63/#respond 

Maybe it was when FM radio waves joined in synergistically. And glyphosate et al mixed in with the saltpitre etc. Who now would investigate the same kind of graphs for smoking since first data was collected? Settled science of an active consensus is protected against reality.

There is such a thing as a negative poster child or 'scapegoat' onto which all the sin can be loaded and righteous superiority vented. I don't say this to join a 'side' but as an observation.

Germany post ww1... and ww2... Carbon dioxide - and sat fats.

On a more acute scale, the diversionary tactic takes the eye off the ball while making any kind of headlines.

All of these strategies can be seen as 'psychological defences' that pertain to everymind in one form or another.

While it wouldn't work to convey my meaning, I not the term 'psychological' is itself a dissociating or distancing term for psychic-emotional issues - be they conflicted, fear-inducing and defence-activating, or a transcendent and joyful appreciation - that may or may not bring social exclusion.

Psychic-emotional conflict is the basic structuring of human consciousness running over human being. I separate the two because a self-consciousness can inhibit, block, filter and distort the appreciation and experience of simply being.

Babies learn to not get in the way of their gut - eating through to eliminating and I see this as a part of learning to focus in the world of the body. In this sense our body-mind (all the chakras if you want) is like a channel through which being knows existence as this particular focus - within a shared focus of nature and culturally inherited and acquired nurture - or psychic-emotional strategies for maintaining a self in terms of the particular as well as general themes of our self and world. For we learn to model it, and we adapt to the model. Once trained, many operate within the frame of their training - while some open the willingness of revision - or learning new ways to see and respond that open new cultural perspective - as an integrative or healing restorative instead of a persistent 'strain' of managed sickness of conflicted purpose or split mind.

But within the narrative identity of attempt to present settled consensus over denied conflicts, is the defence of the split mind as if the rejected or denied is to be outsourced to the 'general population', the taxpayer, or indeed our environment and of course our body.

This attempt to escape conflicts by diversion and denial is only piling them up in forms of delay-avoidance that operates short term illusion for long term pain - that may kill us slowly while clinging to illusions, or flip from managed chaos to chaotic breakdown of any sense of management in a moment.

While common themes come up, I feel that every instance is a unique situation calling for willingness to look and listen - not only to 'the world' of effects and symptoms, but to the 'inner realm' of cause - which is a discernment of the active purpose or purposes as revealed in the psychic-emotional resonances of the communication both with the 'call for help' as within the 'helper'. In other words, things are not always as they seem or are presented or even believed to be - from anyone's point of view. 

The mutual agreements that turn a blind eye to 'psychic-emotional' context are often driven by the wish to make the problem go away or at least hide it or stop it interfering with 'business as usual' - for either the controllers or owners of the suppliers of such a market demand or the buyers.

The body politic attracts or develops biota relative to the terrain or environment. The human environment is always mediated by psycho-emotional meanings and interpretations. This means that our core definitions and beliefs set the range of response, and can set up dysfunction and disease by design - and protect such design as the 'survival' of a psychic misidentification - that then operates parasitically or at expense of the whole. An assertive identity operates a fixed or settled sense of self and reality, set against 'otherness', of association with threat, fear or rejection.

The recognition of self in another is not a loss of self, but the basis of a true with-ness and worth-ship of living. Projection of self-specialness onto others, (positive or negative) is a psychic-emotional trick of getting by association (without giving honest presence) or getting rid of self-negatives by scapegoating. Old habits run a second nature at expense of our first. Dissonant experience is a call to wake up - or identify and release what gets in the way of a truly present appreciation. Noticing is for curiosity - not blame.