Tim Noakes and Freedom

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/02/20/vendetta-the-tim-noakes-affair/#comment-88307 

To the growing awareness of a 'hidden' tyranny I invite considering two aspects, one is the exposure of networks of shared or overlapping private interests that operate politically by deceit of a masked agenda, and the other is the ideas or thinking that effectively constitute the mask.

The former is the level of the personality structure - which is usually denied illumination by the assignment and operation of the mind of guilt and its attack in the other, that serves the basis of power struggle. The latter is thinking that runs as accepted currency, and in exactly the same way as our financial currency systems, is fundamentally rigged or running on the basis of masking deceit.

The term 'Too big to fail' has been assigned to the banking sector in its exposure as a predatory deceit. To rip out the tares would destroy the harvest crop. A true discernment as to the true and false is called for in vigilance against deceit.

A world of lies results from protecting or masking over a hidden lie. Lies go forth and multiply as fig-leaf thinking that by nature shuns or distorts any light of an honest account that would expose our own sense of invalidity or unworthiness. But the lie - like a trojan ploy - hides in the forms of truth, kindness, caring and respectability and is believed and defended as true.

Tim Noakes exemplifies a core honesty of self along with his family support and community support of a willingness to stand in such honesty, despite threat, smear or coercion. This is not the basis for making special his person, but for the likewise aligning in honesty of witness as the core relational value for self, community, and society. So signing the petition may be much more than doing something and then reverting to routine. It can be a stirring of recognition of worth, that needs witnessing and acknowledging in our thought word and deed - whatever lives we may be living. 

Unless we live from a truly extended sense of worth, we are defaulted to thinking that allows us to be manipulated.

Another term for honesty or truth is without manipulation.

The vendetta runs much deeper than any persons who show up on the radar. A sense of justified hate runs as 'self-righteous' exclusion. Cognitive dissonance operates such that no communication can reach any who are certain their hate is just vengeance served. 

 But to a growing willingness to listen and see with a fresh perspective, messengers and symptoms that before were made war upon, are revealed as the bearers of true communication, as the manipulative framework of self-deceits, is released to self honesty.

Restored To Vigour

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-87952 

Not only are you not gone, you are back with vigour, enthusiasm and a sense of rejuvenation.

In a post that didn't get 'accepted' (Malcolm, what's up with you?), I linked to  an admittedly wacky naturopathic doctor who studies living blood under dark field microscopy - which shows not only the flowing or otherwise clumpy nature of the cells, but also in 'real time' shows changes in sync with the patient's shift of perspective. So not only do I feel (resonate) with your sense of new perspective and interest, I have a sense that your blood is less clumpy and more flowing.

Much of what we call thinking is like a lot of modern 'science', filling in the gaps or reinforcements of already established structures of thought. Structure that becomes rigid with less and less life (cultural or relational activity) living through it. Such structure embodies rigidified thought, sense of self and relations. The power of thinking is evident in the resulting negative confinements and constraints of the world we personally and collectively accept, agree to, and act as true. But the recognition and release of a false sense of limitation is the restoring to the discovery and enjoyment of the true. This is also associated with 'health' - and not just by dark field microscopy of the reaction of blood cells to the influx of energy that  an 'a-ha!' moment brings. Realignment in presence rather than capture by a 'model' is the ability to consciously model, or understand in vivo. Within a relational flow of information and experience rather than separating it all out and taking it apart as if to extrapolate something to then apply to life.

Intra and extra cellular communications are not about to reveal all their workings so as to be written up, done and dusted. The electrical nature of the communication is implicit in PH (mineral salt ratios and distributions) as well as quantum attribute that are being uncovered under our nose in the way Life and Nature is and does (and in our sense of smell too).

Is the journey the true nature of our destination? I feel so - for our experience of and presence in life is the result of the purpose we undertake or are stirred to awaken in.

The Best Diet?

https://youtu.be/0z03xkwFbw4

referrenced on https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-87962

The assumption that there is a ‘best diet for humans’ may be clickbaiting to then share something of substance – but before I have a look at the talk, I state that I see such phrasing as the same as the ads that vie for attention, working in the same way and for the same goal. Framing life in terms that then induce – often unwitting – compliance to a suggested narrative.

Gratitude is the best diet for Human being. No one is ever alone in gratitude, and the neglecting to extend gratitude is the miser that grows misery in private self-gratifications that seem to give a ‘hit’ of life but leave a sense of hollowness and lack – and so drive the machine of the attempt to ‘get’ life from ‘out there’.

That is basically the way the deceit works;

1: Steal your Soul (awareness) by mind capture.

2: Sell life back to you as pale substitutions that promise more than they (can) give, fade in any seeming effect, and give rise to further ‘side’ effects that in-debt us to a sense of further need to overcome or escape a sense of lack.

Now I have grokked the video - it reminds me of the difference between the germ theory approach personified in Pasteur et al and the deeper understanding of researchers such as Bechamp.

Indeed I see the germ theory as a personalised continuation of the magic/mythic thinking that remains unchanged beneath most of what is called civilisation.

The field or environment is the determiner - not some 'central intelligence agency' ascribed personal power - nor the projections and reflections of such a power onto a world whose nature is change.

Perhaps I take too big a jump for you to follow, but the same is in Bruce Liptons's discovery of the cell membrane as the primary determiner of action and not the presumed 'control' of the genes - which are in effect the gonads of the cell, not the agency of mind (as ascribed to body).

Mind is properly relational (not a CIA) - and the relational is a Field within which conditions are induced, generated or attracted, such as to embody and reflect the current which is a flow as well as a currency.

Field awareness is would be 'what comes naturally' - and is - but civilising is not just organisation upon a blank slate, but a social organisation growing upon a conditioned drive of extreme and ongoing need-lack. Cultural trauma that is far greater than theories of cave men facing predators.

So we have learned and grown and generally operate from a second nature, that overrides a lost and distrusted or feared sense of a first nature. This is reflected in the relations of 'civilised' to first native peoples. perhaps it starts with toilet training!

But to get back to the video - its presumptions continues the subjugation under and the exo-intelligence of systems upon which to become reliant instead of (using the same recognitions) to wake from and break the spell, by tuning to our own Field awareness as an intuitively guided and supported presence of life. Not instead of all the abilities we have learned, but as the re-discovered purpose in which all such abilities serve a wholeness, healing or integrative outcome.

Global technocratic systems control promises the replacement of the human will with algorithms hooked up to pervasive Big Data, such as to update the whole system in response to any stresses. But this is the attempt to make life in our own image (and under our own control except you are not invited to more than a fantasy of control, while a non-human intelligence works the Pharm.

Being Ourselves, Relating As We Are

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/02/14/what-causes-heart-disease-part-46/#comment-87895 

If indeed you are living the true of who you are, it will serve you better than any attempt to become someone you are not.

But if you need others to be someone who they are not, then that is a sign that you are not able to relate through yourself as you are. We generally hate in others what we cannot abide in ourselves. But of course we may 'get to know someone who is then revealed or recognised other than how we judged them.

The avoidance of stress can be the simple wisdom of a better choice engaged instead - or it can be a self-evasion of symptoms calling for resolution. No one else but yourself is to decide for you.

The term 'best friend' is a singular term. Your wife is a true friend, and that is surely life shared rather than isolation. Isn't this a potential 'life-saver'? Shared life is one of the characteristics of health because joy inherently extends or shines into each other, but then so will self-betrayal... A state of symptom-siege in struggle or worry is neither at ease nor open to the opportunities for appreciations that unite us in kind and in purpose, but not always in terms of social engagement.

The challenge to be in relationship AS ourself is the key to the secret of Life. Or to put that in reverse, a secret sense of self, protected and disguised, makes us (all) stranger to ourself, each other and life. The secret sense of self is the presumed right to judge everyone else. It is also the hiding or defence from those who trespass against us. If such thoughts were broadcast, how would you get on? (Of course if everyone's such thoughts were broadcast the noise would operate a jamming signal against a true thought getting through). What would be a true thought, but a shared thought, rather than private agenda.

Generally it is easy to see that relationships (in our current world) are often demanding, entangling, messy and a sense of disconnection - yet remain a source of actual connection, support, insight, wisdom and freedom. If we seek to use relationships, we not only don't (generally) get what we think we want, but also open ourself to being or feeling used.

To be in the company of another who accepts us as we are is to feel loved. Much of the time we seek reinforcements from others for a lack of worth in ourselves. Or cover over 'awkward' silences in which conflict may be feared but intimacy avoided.

Most all of our troubles are inherent to a mis-identification in fixed and limiting definitions assigned to living being. Relationship is more a dance, than a formula. That which truly moves us is where we align naturally - given permission and circumstance. Something so NATURAL cannot be taught, but the blocks to awareness of our nature can be unlearned.

Why exactly are we (humankind) increasingly aligning against the family based communitarian cultural support that every traditional society has exemplified, until modernity? Our thinking is itself the cause - or rather the thinking we accept and conform to instead of the impulse to live the movement of an acknowledgement, or appreciation.

Is tyrannous (fear-framed) thinking a death sentence? Even though conforming may seem the only way to survive'. I see that is the original meaning of 'the wages of sin'. Not a behavioural failure, but living from the wrong foundation and persisting at expense of true. Is not the 'going forth into the wilderness', symbolic of stepping away from conflicting or troubling thoughts to reveal their root cause as a false self-specialness?

Seeking to be 'better' can be a fear of being worse that brings on even greater humiliation, or a genuine willingness to improve our experience of life with everyone who shares in it.

Normalised Darkness

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/01/27/what-causes-heart-disease-part-forty-five/#comment-87707 

I look in vain for journalism in such media channels of corporate PR.

Instead I find a copy and paste churnalism along with reluctance to upset one of the main advertising sectors.

In part, economic factors drive the corporate nature of maximising profits by minimising costs - where the money supply and markets are basically rigged. Nothing real is affordable - excepting in industries where it HAS to work. IE a building has to stand. (However it does not seem to have to be designed with the safety of its occupants in mind relative to fire). This is exactly like when the body cannibalises its own resources as a result of lack of nutrients and minerals.

If and I emphasise IF some people 's use of some supplements has some ASSOCIATION with some forms of heart or other disease, then allow a simple comparison with iatrogenic misery, sickness and death -  A daily, weekly, monthly, yearly fact that would spark outrage but for invested belief and identity in its protection. And of course in some cases, that protection is valid and needful at some level.

What is 'stupid' about supplements is that we used to have it and be it without knowing what we had, but now most of us have to supplement to thrive rather than survive as an ever diminishing capacity for life.

The MS joke comes to mind; How many Microsoft engineers does it take to change a light bulb.

Answer: None, they declare darkness the new standard.

Regardless the company reference, the fact is that almost anything can become 'normalised' no matter how unnatural - by the adjustment of the mind. But whatever is accepted true, defends itself from threat of change.

The pharmaceutical industry did not displace quackery, so much as buy the rights to use such accusation to regulate against others healing modalities. Modern 'debates' about the provision of health (sickness?) care hardly question the assumption that this is nearly all pharmaceutical in nature.

I would have bought Peter Gøtzsche's latest book but his bias against vitamins at the outset (I read inside on Amazon) gave me a sense of cognitive dissonance. In the same way Dr David Healy seeks only a pharmaceutical 'answer' (offering a substantial prize) to the seemingly permanent loss of sexual function to psychoactive Pharma drug use. Nutrition alone is not enough - except it may be enough to bring a clarity in place of a fog, such that more aligned choices, in every area of our lives, align the health to truly live them.

Re-educating in place of flawed model (T Jowell)

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/01/27/what-causes-heart-disease-part-forty-five/#comment-87458 

If there are not resources for addressing AF - or other CVD issues - without pharma (or with reduced/reducing pharma), then there needs be. Magnesium is something that I see being a factor as the regulation of calcium. I believe ongoing stress/anxiety uses up magnesium and some levels of anxiety may run as a background that becomes as if normal - but is not natural. Nor deserves to be adapted to.

The timing of the heartbeat is also an electrical event and the salts are key in blood electrical activity - while I believe cell membranes (cholesterol et al) and structural matrixes (collagen et al) are also serving as whole body intercommunication.  In one sense I see health as restore communication of a whole in all its parts. (Coherence - as termed by Heartmath).

Omega3 offers some anticoagulance with less adversity than aspirin. (As well as setting its relation to Omega 6 is in due ratio). And of course warfarin may give a much less adverse effect if balanced with K2.

I don't suggest to 'know' the 'answer' so much as to indicate that legally protected authorised 'knowledge' is largely biased to seek and only find 'answers' that serve its own self-interests. And so a self-directed and shared re-education is initiated in the interest of all, that may or may not bring the revision of a deeply flawed (falsely floored ;-) model. But I am at least no longer marching to an out of timed beat.

I don't depend on (or seek to exploit) a top-down global group-think for funding or employ so I am free to question and explore and share the journey. The Medical Establishment is not so free. I found Tessa Jowell's appeal in the House of Lords (to whom exactly?) a pathos of emotional entreaty from the powerless to 'THEY who cant be named'. The resulting sympathy and veneration of her person, then diverted from who and what she sought to represent - health freedom for those with cancer AND those attending them (inc doctors). "Please let us be allowed to explore other remedy for ills whose archaic and barbarous 'standard treatments' are legally mandated and protected by law against change.

Ok we don't (as far as I know) cut people's hearts out and through them down the pyramid steps to appease 'power', but the core religion of sacrifice runs unchanged under perhaps a more complex priesthood. Perhaps the fear we give power to, works the corruption of power.

Relieving Me Of My Own Choices

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/01/27/what-causes-heart-disease-part-forty-five/#comment-87452 

Robert, I don't know of any site or anyone who is altogether 'trustworthy' in terms of relieving me of my own choices - and in this case I might use 'my own choices' as  a shortcut term for my own journey of a growing awareness, enquiry and research, that then finds others in shared purpose. I expect that in Chris Masterjohn's work you not only found valuable information, but of a context that you  resonate with as honourable or having integrity.

So while I suggest there is no one or nothing out there that can be altogether trusted, I also share appreciation of the basis on which trust is extended, as one of genuine question or movement of curiosity and desire to know. 

Further reflections....

When first we uncover new understandings, we tend to lock onto that form as 'The Understanding', and build upon that and in that sense make idol of the form at expense of subtler relationships not recognised and accounted for in the model in which we 'trust'. This then informs our language and thinking so as to make the model 'built in' or invisible.

To quote a WW2 poster 'careless talk costs lives'. Our thought, word and deed have consequence, and in specific terms of not clearly delineating the functional differences of K1 and K2 along with the role in particular that K2 plays in calcium transport, we play a part in propagating an ignorance of otherwise easily avoidable disability, pain and loss. (note: I am also becoming more aware of magnesium's role in the regulation of calcium also - there is always more to meet a willingness to learn).

I don't feel moved to 'go forth' to rid the world of ignorance and 'save everyone' - not least because that is not an altogether honest motivation but also because life doesn't work that way. Where I uncover my own part in an ignorance, and am corrected or relieved of it, I no longer support or propagate it - and tune in with the circumstance as to the movement I may feel to share it and the receptivity of the mind to receive it.

Many followers of this blog may wish and believe that there is simply the 'right' information, or discovery, that once verified, becomes dependable Fact. While there is something in that as a more truly aligned sense of our world and relations, the key error I see in the human thinking, is of assigning trust OUTSIDE our own aware and awake willingness to listen, look and check in or find out.

Finding out that the body, (insofar as it can be 'understood' in terms of processes of communication, bio-chemistry and balance), is unimaginably fast, complex and for want of better words an embodiment of 'intelligence'. My primary sense is that our so called 'consciousness' (for it is often a conditioned reflex) has the capacity to 'get in the way' of its true need - in pursuance of wished or imagined needs. And that sets us on a journey. 

There are many ignorances or mistaken assumptions that have tragic consequences but for their correction. Perhaps not least those that result from a misguided attempt to 'correct'! I see much investment in the false that then inevitably defends against the true, in fear of personal exposure and loss. I also see there is a timing for the release of that which is no longer meaningful, desirable or held true, that each of us come to in our own willingness for a more truly aligned appreciation.

PS having just read your linked article to C.J on V K2, I was moved that he acknowledged W Price and the nuanced qualifications for quality of food. That issue came up in a Mercola interview I watched last night, focusing on the history and nature of intensive chicken farming and adverse health issues - which was worth watching in my opinion. (Not about Vit K2 - but the same economic and legal infrastructures operate what could be called the fake food industry).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NoDiSjb8i8

This interview also has an illuminating glimpse into the fact that animal husbandry has already done a lot of research on the nature and interactions of vitamins and minerals with controlled trials that would be almost impossible to reproduce in human studies. It also had a very interesting discovery from when certain large scale operations stopped routine antibiotics as a way to suppress the sickness that such living conditions generates.

(Youtube tip to the obvious (?) I often find 1.25 playback speed works fine for slower talkers).

The Idea We Hold About Anything Is How We Relate To It

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/01/27/what-causes-heart-disease-part-forty-five/#comment-87456 

The idea we hold or assign to cancer makes all the difference as to how we then relate to it. Many treatments reduce or toxify the cellular function because cancer in many forms operates as a life process (growth) as the idea that 'cancer is a tumour', either as a physical blockage that eventually impairs function, or as a diversion of nutrients and resources to a 'cancer process' that literally starves the body to feed the disease state.

Nothing can induce confusion more than setting off with the wrong map, or with a 'consensus' that the map should be upside down.

I see the patterning of these issues as applying all the way down to the core of felt relationship with life. One of the functions of disease crises is to release what doesn't serve us, rather than defend it to the death. So it may be wise not to manually switch our metabolic function on full, if we are still using life energy to more successfully block life energy. If that sounds like nonsense, it is - but presented as the idea of controlling life, it has a widespread appeal.

Timing is everything (I find myself typing). Successful disintegration of tumours can itself be a cause of toxicity that without due diligence, kills us. It may be that many cancers are not nearly as life- threatening as the (standard) treatment (of care) - which starts with a nocebo of a 'death sentence' that has been protected and maintained since cancers became widespread.

The idea we hold or assign to anything makes all the difference as to how we then relate to it. Those who have most influence over 'narrative control' use fear as fuel to gain attention and allegiance to their idea of 'protection'. But are 'they' protecting us, or the model that gives them prestige, influence, and power to maintain huge budgets - such that the growth of a 'negative Economy' sucks out all the wealth and health from the whole - because a set of encapsulated ideas are 'too big to fail'.