The Idea We Hold About Anything Is How We Relate To It

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/01/27/what-causes-heart-disease-part-forty-five/#comment-87456 

The idea we hold or assign to cancer makes all the difference as to how we then relate to it. Many treatments reduce or toxify the cellular function because cancer in many forms operates as a life process (growth) as the idea that 'cancer is a tumour', either as a physical blockage that eventually impairs function, or as a diversion of nutrients and resources to a 'cancer process' that literally starves the body to feed the disease state.

Nothing can induce confusion more than setting off with the wrong map, or with a 'consensus' that the map should be upside down.

I see the patterning of these issues as applying all the way down to the core of felt relationship with life. One of the functions of disease crises is to release what doesn't serve us, rather than defend it to the death. So it may be wise not to manually switch our metabolic function on full, if we are still using life energy to more successfully block life energy. If that sounds like nonsense, it is - but presented as the idea of controlling life, it has a widespread appeal.

Timing is everything (I find myself typing). Successful disintegration of tumours can itself be a cause of toxicity that without due diligence, kills us. It may be that many cancers are not nearly as life- threatening as the (standard) treatment (of care) - which starts with a nocebo of a 'death sentence' that has been protected and maintained since cancers became widespread.

The idea we hold or assign to anything makes all the difference as to how we then relate to it. Those who have most influence over 'narrative control' use fear as fuel to gain attention and allegiance to their idea of 'protection'. But are 'they' protecting us, or the model that gives them prestige, influence, and power to maintain huge budgets - such that the growth of a 'negative Economy' sucks out all the wealth and health from the whole - because a set of encapsulated ideas are 'too big to fail'.