Whack-a-Mole as loss of consciousness to systemic defence

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/06/02/how-does-covid-kill-people/#comment-164806 

David:

Why are a lot of infected people asymptotic? Do they have particularly healthy endothelia? And where does vitamin D fit into this hypothesis? * (see below for my response to this)

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick: (to David)

Because they have a good immune system and bat the virus away before it can do any damage.

To Malcolm:

This almost suggests a 'bad' immune system and 'naughty' viruses.

Why not allow a functioning immune system to be where natural viral response IS immune function, rather than where a ‘detoxing episode’ becomes framed as a 'life threatening pathogen'?

In this I assign such 'sickness' a role within health rather than as a source of fear and control for human (psychic-emotional and social-medical) interventions and impositions.

As well as toxicity is strain. Constant strain is a great burden on the resources and an episode of sickness can in effect force a rest that may save not just a stitch in time, but an MI - Heart attack.

Our accepted model is the context for our perceiving and reacting to our world.

The game of 'whack-a-mole is an attempt to  'make it go away' - and in a short term need - may be called for. You may want to allay a cold onset so as to deliver the speech you have been invited and paid - and travelled to deliver.  On the other hand you may be glad of an excuse not to have to attend a function that is compelled, meaningless and onerous.

My health changed radically when I became self employed within a sense of meaning and challenge that aligned me in joy in life. Great strain can be the 'normal' of a life never able to really happen.

The more we want something to 'go away' the more defences are set against it - normalised as structures that we lose the capacity to even imagine changing - while the 'pesky moles' take on more dissonance as a systemic breakdown that of course calls up systemic means to batten down or bat away feared conflict.

Feared conflict then becomes the systemic replacement for what consciousness once navigated with a sense of wholeness.

In my reading today I encountered research that states consciousness has been steadily decreasing - my own explanation being that of constant normalise strain of defences against unresolved conflict.  I duck-goed 'Gert Gerken' as the reference to what is in my printed book:

https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/losing-our-senses.129493/

snip/

The researchers at GRP now feel that over the past twenty-five years the brain of the 

average individual has undergone significant changes in its organization. The decrease in 

sensitivity to sensory stimuli implies that stimuli are being processed 

in a different way than before. Researchers hypothesize that there are fewer cross linkag-

es or networks in the brain; therefore primarily optical stimuli go directly to 

the optical center without activating other sensory or emotional centers. Thus 

human beings can take in very powerful stimuli that are discordant, senseless, or 

contradictory without being bothered. The trend researcher Gert Gerken has 

labeled this phenomenon "the new indifference." 

/snip

I note that this pattern applies no less to Science.

How normal are we willing to be?

'Whatever!' ?

Redesignating human being as an infection status that must subjugate its own life to protect a 'herd' that HAS no individual expression - excepting of course those who design and run the model. We used to call it the rat race, and seek to escape, but now it is more of a global experiment on human lab rats in which our safety is their paramount concern. (!)

Language structures the mind. "Watch it, you!" - If you value having one.

Awareness of the world around us may be too painful to bear - but may also facilitate recognising and releasing model frameworks that invisibly lock down and mask conflict into the body Corporate such as to protect a caged bubble from upset and offence.

David:

Why are a lot of infected people asymptotic? Do they have particularly healthy endothelia? And where does vitamin D fit into this hypothesis?

Because the term ‘infection’ is being abused. There are innumerable latent virus and bacterial functions within you at any given time. Are you thus a walking time bomb of contagion that could go off amidst an protected status of susceptibility that is in fact a likewise diverse Biotic synergy?(“Life Jim, but not as we know it”).

‘Asymptomatic infected people’ means ‘healthy people’.

Medicalising life as a source of profit and control works by framing health, life and nature in terms of an evil to eradicate, control, and manage – rather than Be and share in.

Its a technological version of St George that has in effect become the evil or chaos he thought to subdue.

Generally – life is a workability – excepting that it loses the ability to create workarounds to blocks, scarcities and conflicts that don’t resolve and operate as blocks, toxicities, imbalances and insufficiencies.

Allowing that a lot of iatrogenic and environmental stress or exposure is the result of unresolved human (relational) conflicts, we are effectively poisoning our own nest – perhaps most insidiously under the guise of boosting or manually taking over our ‘immune function’ (life).

Vit D has such a massive role within health (immune function) as to ask why did we agree to lockdown into hypothesis that framed us out of our natural environment of common sense health and fitness for a medicalised weakness demanding mass sacrifice of individual liberty – or else be assigned the status of virus by a Medical State?

The recent events are only closing the door on a herd that had already been domesticated and branded – bar a bit of shouting and some bio-technical track and tracery.

Where in all this is solid ground?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/

Quite apart from valid counts, are valid tests, for valid conditions or established fact.
Science shifted from empiricism to the computer model, and from empirically validated standards to convenient (model supporting) mathematical abstracts.

We (mostly) take on trust that a 'novel' (?) virus was 'discovered' in serum taken from a very very few suffering extreme respiratory reactions to extreme air pollution. Despite the fact that viral expressions (they come from living cells) constantly mutate - and are thus 'new' as a matter of course - and yet share the same basic profiles of symptom as other flus, colds, and coronaviral infections/expressions.

So where in all this is a 100% solid ground from which to begin science - rather than applying scientific processes to pet theories or subconscious fears given funding?

Zoom out and see that overall cause of death has more correlation with the lockdown - and so the scientific idea (if you need proof) is to challenge the correlation so as to disprove causation - yes? However, death is generally the result of a series of breakdowns of life support - which are personal (psychic-emotional) as well as social and environmental - now compounded by social and political hysteria which is none the less keeping an iron grip regardless any appeal to reason or call to account.

Like a game of musical chairs, when the music re-starts, there is less support for living. Initially this is those who die from their fear and isolation - and from the measures undertaken as defence. That this is a top-down orchestration is simply evident.

The idea of a mainstream 'reality' as a management system, that insiders are aware of as partial or false is part of any masked private agenda. A restructuring to vertical commands rather than horizontal interactions of communication and trust under structures of guidance and support for life.
We find out what love is by creating a world without it.
But what we give our love or energy and support to - remains our choosing.
The need I see is for restoring and holding perspective amidst polarising and self-reinforcing reaction.

There is an imperative operating through the few, set over the many - under various narrative justifications for 'orders' or paid employ. Insiders know more but are less able to speak even if they were moved to.

It's all very well to judge others - but we meet our own risk-assessment in terms of where do we draw our line as to what we say, to whom, whether we comply and the way we comply - and why. This is the realm of responsibility FROM which we meet with or communicate to others. We can all rush about (at home in our heads) with what everyone else SHOULD do or should never have done - but where is our voice at any table of social decision making?

I sense that a Reset was and is inevitable - but that those doctoring our Economy and engineering of Society want to manually manage the outcomes, by blocking our immune response and setting up bio-tech dependencies as a deeper level of control.

Under compression of severe challenge or impending death, we are often moved to align in the qualities and priorities that a life driven by worldly demands denied us. Making our peace and aligning in the joy of each moment as we can find willingness to recognise is also a healing modality - regardless the physical outcome.

Intuitively I sense there are many who intuit that fear is itself dangerous, and so they are indeed living a chosen bubble by which to not give fear the power to wreck their lives - even while the wrecking of the world we knew is being carried out with helicopter money and completely unsustainable premises. Force Majeure is being claimed by some as a way to escape contracts they can no longer keep. Is it an Act of God (as used to be used in legal documents) or is it the pre-emptive assumption of such an act under a manually usurped 'new world order'?
Somewhat like the premise of the vaccination - in which a limited sacrifice, operates the masking belief in defence from the feared Total Sacrifice - (and which of course DOES the thing it is premised to defend agaist).

Terrors from the deep are very real in their effects

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/#comment-164530

These 'what if's' are for what purpose?
I have read that in places where doctors can strike, the death toll goes down when they do.
However the belief that doctors save lives and are a bulwark against terror of death and disease is so deep set that no mere facts will make the slightest difference.

I now move from personal reply to general reflection.

We are in a time in which we can witness such deep set terrors in operation.
I read this morning a section of J Chilton Pearce (The Biology of Transcendence) on his childhood night terrors - which unlike nightmares always ran their full course and could not be interfered with by 'reality' - ie parents attempts to calm or reason an open eyed screaming child, for all stimuli fed the terror and became part of it. The terror eventually ran its course and left a complete amnesia accompanied by a dread of being alone.
At a certain age he determined to allow going into the dream and to remember it, which was the capacity to observe the event from a perspective outside its drama - and thus release it. This he did.

Terrors from the deep are very real in their effects - not least in our defences set up against them,
The main difference I see in our current collective terror - which is not really about an infectious virus but the activation of ancient fear, is that it was summoned or invoked by design. I recognise the cock-up theory offers a masking mitigation against such unthinkable or unbearable malice - but is not our recoil from this the 'blind eye' by which it operates as 'private agenda'?

The need to seek and find diversion by which to  avoid being alone with what we cannot bear will drive all kinds of agenda - but the willingness and readiness to go into it as the desire and determination to be free of running and hiding from it - is a development of character and consciousness of love of life - rather than clinging to fears.

Deaths are inherent to a realm of birth and unfolding experience, but killing is an intent that has repercussions on the giver and receiver that generate trauma that - unless truly addressed - does energetically manifest negative symptoms in the families and societies of its context.

By deceit, people can be induced to effectively kill themselves, in ways that leave the setter of the deceit free of blame or at least able to claim plausible deniability. Junkfood, weedkiller, polluting  manufactures, as well as inducing and fermenting fear, conflict and war - such as this one.
But regardless the legal shenanigans,and masking in obfuscations, the record holds the act of intent to denial as a backlog of debt, that of itself 'locks down' and denies future growth.

The weight of a great evil or terror cannot be escaped by masking in an increasing dense masking bubble - excepting as a binding to blind mechanism as some coded memory of what life might have been, set in targets of compliance where once the heart moved freely.

The point of looking directly at what is going on is not to feed moral outrage - though we meet it - but to uncover where our own identity masking has set beliefs that deny us a true appreciation of - and basis for - shared reality.

Fear of denial and exclusion - like a cornered rat - can strike out in last ditch defiance.
When this fear is shared by the 'establishment' as their vision of an inescapable future of breakdown, as fear of pain and loss - it is nurtured and grown as a global strategy of 'escape' - not for humanity but for their vision of control over its perceived unworthiness.

My sense is that compression is a natural process of refinement that comes to seed - (what could be a more compressed life form than a seed?) - that harvests or integrates the fruits of its prior expansion as a result of qualitative acceptance - or priorities. Conflicts cannot be pushed out into long grass when all is converging to a reckoning. But by what mind is the reckoning? Because the mind that generated the conflict can only operate the narrative of masking as an expression OF it.

And yet the very nature of fear given power of acceptance and belief, is to shut down the higher centres of consciousness that translate and embody qualitative intelligence to workable and practical action.

Here we are.


- - -


post #2

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/#comment-164532

How about holding the Media to account?
There would have been no pandemic without the lockstep media.
The hope of a political sovereignty in our political class or system is misplaced.
Financial parameters operate the ability to favour or choke back almost everything now – including global food supply and permission to leave your house or earn a living.
Financial and social restructuring is the underlying purpose of the pretext that works it intended purpose. The basis of our ‘economics’ is fraud and all else is necessarily captured or subverted to run and protect a society running on deceit – which can only operate destructively in self-reinforcing loop.

Living From Wholeness - A Shift of Perspective

in response to the themes in:

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162494 

I appreciate your response, but I am not writing from the predicates that are - to my understanding - the frame from which the problem is built-in - and this is why the reader's mind of such a conditioned or habitual presumption is not fed. It simply cannot translate into the old wine bottles and nor is that my desire. But that doesn't mean there is no bridge the the reader's recognition.

Bringing into a mainstreamed attention can indeed popularise ideas in seeking and finding agreement - but then the message is adulterated and diluted into marketing - which doesn't have to be for money - but for validation, self-reinforcement or attempt to lockstep alliances against feared or hated 'others'.

So I rest - truly rest - in the meanings that I share. And yet I am aware they are often very compressed or 'intense' - there's enough in a paragraph sometimes to make a chapter. 

But if a long slow process of adaptation is offered, be sure that the ego - or self-manipulative mind - will learn to pass off as true. That's it job description - and our learned expertise.

The sudden shift of recognition is not the refinements of a 'babylonian structure' of levels by which to define, divide and control - but a direct intuition - without any intermediary to your own being.

The apparent conflict between a 'fear and control mindset' and the direct intuition or felt quality of life is coming up to a head. But it isn't a conflict OUT there - it is our choice, now.

But a choice of priority - not of exclusivity. By all means let us use the mind and systems of control to serve the living. But not to replace it - or there simply is no living.

The dynamic of this pervades everything and so regardless what is or isn't said, the mind of a lockdown self isolating defence against loss of control as if loss of self, is founded on vigilance against love's honesty now - because it represents the weakening or loss of invested defences, identified in emotionally driven and necessary denials, lies and illusions.

No one is going to untangle what we have made WITH the tools or focus that made it.

Aligning in a transparency to presence is the allowing of the undoing of such identity in fear and guilted lock in as we are willing to release.

But all that I am saying gives power to the process of genuine curiosity and sharing in the discovery of healing anything - as bring it back from a specialised isolate to a direct integrality within a wholeness of being.

Witnessing from wholeness must meet the defences (attacks or denials) of the choice for self-isolation under fear's control, but also pass through the temptation to react in like kind and effectively rejoin the reinforcement and witnessing to a crab-barrel world. So I respect our freedom to choose against what we are not ready and willing or moved at all to engage with as long as we own our own decision rather than guilting and blaming others for our attempt to shut down, wall off or eradicate what we are effectively choosing to ignore for our own reasons,

By all means let Shaun move on - but realise that power is known by having already done it.

By all means ask me to limit my input so as not to fill a page with long posts that perhaps few find any movement or moment to alight in. Ask and be answered. Its easy. But it opens relationship - and that is where our fears are already enacted as a pre-emptive judgement that replaces relational freedom with contracts and rules of ritual exchange set in manipulative avoidance.

We were already normalised to a lockdown, social distancing, and conformed compliance and it is already a great strain of death and taxes on our unfolding a shared experience of who we are. It is the human conditioning - regarded as a noun or concrete hardwired fact.

Now, as T.S Elliot offered, "we arrive at our starting place to know it for the first time". How so? Because it was first set in division, fear, confusion of unknowing. Now it is given us to look on from a new point of perspective. Fear's toxic debts cant be 'hidden' by clever accounting and more comes into the open. We might to be retching out what does have a true belonging rather than locking down further into denial. Perhaps the 'Reset' for some may be of the same order, but only as they are willing to accept or choose this for themselves. 

No one can choose for another. But the intent to do so will entangle those we seek to control. if others play along in outsourcing their responsibility as if to escape consequence, there will be a  'joining' for keeping the appearance of a mutual getting device that locks in a parent-child  - and a child-parent manipulation at expense of genuine relationship as the basis for life and growth.

Below is the context.

Jerome Savage 

Sorry Binra

Read that twice & still cant quite grasp your message

Shaun Clark 

Jerome, Can we move on? Whomever this is he /she is a fruitcake. Sorry

I regard your comment as exactly what a disinfo troll would get paid for, by sowing discord, undermining trust and limiting communication under cover of pretended familiarity. It seems to be a habit of yours. If you have something of substance to say – man up and say it.

(Why Malcolm do you give any support to posts of no point but scapegoating smear and incitement to social exclusion? ) 

I include myself by reason of interest and participation in the issues and themes raised. If you are only looking for what gratifies your personal terms and conditions – then you must meet so much to despise in your life and yet take such satisfaction pushing it from your mind.

But your mind is going with it.

The underlying issue behind the covid19 pretext is control of communication.

Masking as a need to protect life – while actually feeding more control to a destructive control agenda. That infantilised and mindless people are induced to suck on and applaud!

If you can show evidence to the contrary, I welcome hearing it. If you want to shut me down then I identify you as that agenda – regardless your presentation of ‘matey’ direction as if the moderator is absent and the inmates can take over the asylum. I’m not saying you cant try. But then you get your results in kind. The same will apply to mad people who try to rule the world.

KJE
Now that was easy to understand. Basically, you tend to write in jargon and use what are unfamiliar terms to most people – that’s what is meant by “fruitcake”. If you wrote in plainer language, you’d probably find that most people agree with you or can at least understand what you have to say and comment accordingly

- - - - - - - -


a short follow up to another post by teedee126:

As someone who volunteered for years at a Crisis Centre, I dealt with people on all points of the mental health spectrum, but the one thing that many callers had in common was a feeling of intense loneliness, mainly brought on by the despicable stigmatism against the mentally ill. It was heartbreaking that their families, former friends and coworkers, as well as their own GP’s and sometimes their Psychiatrists, who above all should know better, all made them feel ‘less than’ as a person.I found it despicable to see someone on this thread called a “fruitcake” and dumbfounded as to why the comment was allowed to be posted in the first place. Regardless what any of us think of Binra’s writing, whether we get something of value from it or find it difficult to process in our often tired minds, that was inexcusable and has me questioning a comment I once made about this site being ‘an island of comfort and sanity’ or whatever it was I said. It’s very much a place of favouritism and cliquism in some cases, but why that should disappoint or surprise me is something I’ll have to work out for myself.

At risk of over-commenting - it is how we respond to problems when they come up, that establishes our character or culture - not an ideal of perfect freedom for having them.
I have no axe to grind on my own account but if we don't support the principle of communication, why be surprised when we suddenly find we no longer have it - or feel so self-censored as to lock-down and self-exclude?
See how easily our fears can trigger reaction! I don't mean that in blame to anyone but simply to promote vigilance to pause and consider before acting from our first emotional response. I of course include myself in that invitation.  To be safe we have to honour our current sense of where we choose to be in relation to our world. There is no safety as such in the world. Growing trust together is growing a safety that includes accepting differences, respectfully. If we replace all such (at times messy) process with systems and rules - we can have our problem free robotic world order.
Problems must then be opportunity for growth rather than a way to fund a private agenda at expense of the whole - when we step back from them rather than jump in.

We have and are the right and the freedom to uncover a gift in anything

Can someone really argue that autism is a gift? What ?

We have and are the right and the freedom to uncover a gift in anything - but no one has the right to usurp or pre-empt that by their own imposition.
There is both a beloved, and a heartbreak compounded by injustice - under which one either deepens a faith in life for the living, or loses it to a cover story seeking lockstep agreements to set against the pain of not only the above - but also shame of self betrayal.

This pattern is also seen in covid-mind-masking as mind capture under an escape-narrative from self-conflicted fear. It is a very hard place to be in when your sense of self and world fall apart. That's the last place we would go - and so we often try to leave it to the very last minute and never actually share the gift of a life we are effectively running away from.

Suffering CAN initiate a journey of waking compassion - but only to the willingness to both give and receive love's acceptance. Those who evangelise for what they have not truly accepted for themself are always dissociated from their own rage and terror and so it leaks out in all kinds of unintended consequences. On the other hand using our own or anyone else's victimhood as a political or identity agenda is underhand and deceitful.

While our world depends on short-cuts and labels - I see that everyone has and is their own unique version of 'whatever' and need not be defined BY it. Whatever we take definition from becomes 'god' to our choice to accept it. It tells us who we are and frames how we respond.

The danger of any litigious or grievous claim is investing in the wound as the means to vindictive vengeance instead of justice. But bitterness poisons the accuser and those around them.
The dedication to truth in the service of others  releases the personal agenda to a path of honouring truth and true witness, above the means to mask, hide, and evade it that persist the lie along with its tragic consequence.

Unless new evidence convinces otherwise the denial or attack upon the biota of our world and gut is effectively cauterising us from our life support biologically, emotionally and mentally.
Self-isolated, locked down and effectively behaving in a cancerous way. Don't blame the virus.
Unless of course coming OUT of lockdown is more fearful than all the devils we know.
In this sense I am using the term for a human consciousness that became pathologically normalised.

The underlying dynamic we cannot and need not escape

I just noticed Siddel's twitter dump within the comment I had replied to.

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162148

(My email notification of the post did not show it).

The agenda reveals a mouthpiece. Siddel supposedly self-launched himself to covid fame with a kitchen report, still sweating from the trenches while frantically entreating; 'This is not a virus!'.

Whoever he may represent, he is restating the core hypnotic suggestions by which the many are accepting dehumanising degradation and a course in social-relational (spiritual) death assenting to bio-slavery, as willing compliance to a control agenda that has NO willingness for real communication. Who listens there WANTS this on one level or another.

There is no treating with it BUT to hold it at heart as released of legitimacy from alignment in our own appreciation - while IT runs its course. What makes NO sense, inherently attacks and undermines all sense to take in or be taken in by. To take offence is to act from already being attacked - and thus invested.

This 'control agenda' is locked down, socially isolated and isolating, and treating a situation of living and called for communication as contagious threat - but love is not contagion. Love belongs here. Fear is the estranger.

The underlying issue here pertains to Communication in the fullest meaning of the word. New science is uncovering us to a Universe and a Biosphere of communication that is of vibrational resonances within self-organising expressions of dynamic equilibrium. I will uplevel from quantum observations (or downlevel from plasma cosmology) to the matrix of micro-biota as the foundation of our biosphere. If we seek to kill or enslave this 'Mater' we set the measure of our own receiving. No one else is ultimately responsible for our own choices to give our will to others, or to circumstances.
Our self justifying narratives do not resolve or truly escape consequence. Repackaged debts are still called in.

The basis of consciousness as cell or self of larger living system, is the balancing of inner and outer conditions as an interstitial medium of total communication - within which are relatively distinct domains that are integrally participant and yet also themselves.

The nature of a traumatised human consciousness is a loss of the field or embracing sustenance of connection and communication, to a contracted sense of isolation and control surrounded by an 'alien' threat. Under specific conditions of threat, this is our 'reptilian' brain. It has functional necessary service to preserving the life of the body. But under trauma, it will override all higher functions and operate against its own true function. Self-destructively. A fully closed system in which control has conquered life, is death.

The willingness of aligning in control agenda paints itself in a corner from which there is no way out and the cost of survival in such terms demands always greater un-humanity to be accepted as normalised sacrifice that will never be paid off. 'Infection' with innate intelligence  awaits required or mandated official treatment? I object! And I let it be known that I object.

The demands of a phase of compression naturally occur when a period of expansion reaches chaotic disequilibrium call for qualitative refinement of purpose. But to invested identity may feel like being crushed or deeply threatened, and invoke regressive contraction from life in a stricture of death, instead of to the seeding synchronicity for a new phase of expansion.

When we are triggered, we literally operate a dissociated and dissociating persona and are not in our right mind. Conditioned, triggered, and controlled by hated fears - or loved hates.

Releasing trauma, or conflicting elements set in grievance, is necessarily to revisit the triggering conditions in willingness to uncover new perspective that is wholly recognisable and understandable as an appreciation, shared.

Postscript:

KJE:

How much of that was actually In English? I could have filled a buzzword bingo card. Just sayin’

Hateful propaganda can be coined in English and believing we understand it can and does deliver us unto evil.
From where would you question your current presumptions, terms, conditions and demands that deliver you to the world you judge as real? Many not only don't question, nor does it ever actually occurred to them to do so. Nor can they follow any who do.

Covid-capture syndrome is a state of dissociation under which the subject simply refuses to see, hear, understand or accept anything that is not mandated by a lock-stepped mind.

It is the privilege of those who step outside of such locked down meanings, to be mistranslated by an intent to immunise against feared truth. Truth never has been locked into words, but embodies and is given witness in truly shared meanings. As distinct from 'Newspeak' in which anything means whatever Big Brother says it means today regardless what it meant yesterday or shall mean tomorrow.

When you sign off in feigned retreat as 'Just saying' you illustrate a way of undermining what you have to say in self depreciation. Perhaps to pre-empt someone else reacting in a way you don't want to have to engage with or stand up to? Why not say truly 'just' things and stand in them - while you are alive? Why not aspire to grow a better experience of yourself and your life instead of looking for something to 'relieve yourself' on?

Perhaps you can share what YOU see as motivating a huge and intentional contraction of the global economy set under draconian reaction to a pretext for panic, meekly followed and even applauded? Why would anyone choke back supply but to set controls over the lives and minds by conditioning the behaviour of another's 'normal"?

At the moment the political will is a Gated community.

We may choose or be moved to focus on any aspect and at any level of a rich drama unfolding, and that is our freedom. I take no less and no more than that, and share it to any who at least dimly recognise the drama operates a negative self-reinforcing loop. But if you have something to say - why don't you say it instead of dumping on those who - for your own reasons - you take offence from. Show that you are not 'just sayin' things to provoke division and distrust?

Magical Beliefs Oppose And Undermine Our Life Support

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162062 

I note your assumption that Cov19 only began when scientists 'discovered' it and only spreads as we test for it, and also note that Sars-Cov-2 has not been demonstrated to CAUSE an 'infection or disease' that has no clinical symptoms in about half or more of its 'hosts' and variable clinical mostly mild symptoms that are shared with other respiratory diseases and which viruses (of association) are also present but not tested for. (Though I saw one account where this was done and of course CV19 was not the only virus detected as present at some degree in the host.

But giving one thing exclusive priority renders all else in its image.

I suspect along with Fred Hoyle, Zach Bush and no doubt others, that the winds (meteorological conditions) carry genetic info all around the biosphere - just as they transit intercontinental teeny weeny spiders. Would UV level affect this communication network in the light that the higher spectra of UV deconstructs all viral structures. Perhaps there is too much of this in the summer?

While I don't see virus as The Cause, I do see it as genetic messaging that includes instructions - ie: to initiate defences against toxicity in the lung (periodically or as triggered by new toxicological - environmental alerts).

Of course life doesn't have to make sense and concocting superstitions and magical rites against an ultimate meaningless torture is all one can resort to in lockdown against it and thus seem to make sense by opposition. I hold that magical beliefs are what conflict with and oppose or undermine our life support. Especially when we intensify our investments to protect them from re-evaluation in the light of failure.