The underlying dynamic we cannot and need not escape

I just noticed Siddel's twitter dump within the comment I had replied to.

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162148

(My email notification of the post did not show it).

The agenda reveals a mouthpiece. Siddel supposedly self-launched himself to covid fame with a kitchen report, still sweating from the trenches while frantically entreating; 'This is not a virus!'.

Whoever he may represent, he is restating the core hypnotic suggestions by which the many are accepting dehumanising degradation and a course in social-relational (spiritual) death assenting to bio-slavery, as willing compliance to a control agenda that has NO willingness for real communication. Who listens there WANTS this on one level or another.

There is no treating with it BUT to hold it at heart as released of legitimacy from alignment in our own appreciation - while IT runs its course. What makes NO sense, inherently attacks and undermines all sense to take in or be taken in by. To take offence is to act from already being attacked - and thus invested.

This 'control agenda' is locked down, socially isolated and isolating, and treating a situation of living and called for communication as contagious threat - but love is not contagion. Love belongs here. Fear is the estranger.

The underlying issue here pertains to Communication in the fullest meaning of the word. New science is uncovering us to a Universe and a Biosphere of communication that is of vibrational resonances within self-organising expressions of dynamic equilibrium. I will uplevel from quantum observations (or downlevel from plasma cosmology) to the matrix of micro-biota as the foundation of our biosphere. If we seek to kill or enslave this 'Mater' we set the measure of our own receiving. No one else is ultimately responsible for our own choices to give our will to others, or to circumstances.
Our self justifying narratives do not resolve or truly escape consequence. Repackaged debts are still called in.

The basis of consciousness as cell or self of larger living system, is the balancing of inner and outer conditions as an interstitial medium of total communication - within which are relatively distinct domains that are integrally participant and yet also themselves.

The nature of a traumatised human consciousness is a loss of the field or embracing sustenance of connection and communication, to a contracted sense of isolation and control surrounded by an 'alien' threat. Under specific conditions of threat, this is our 'reptilian' brain. It has functional necessary service to preserving the life of the body. But under trauma, it will override all higher functions and operate against its own true function. Self-destructively. A fully closed system in which control has conquered life, is death.

The willingness of aligning in control agenda paints itself in a corner from which there is no way out and the cost of survival in such terms demands always greater un-humanity to be accepted as normalised sacrifice that will never be paid off. 'Infection' with innate intelligence  awaits required or mandated official treatment? I object! And I let it be known that I object.

The demands of a phase of compression naturally occur when a period of expansion reaches chaotic disequilibrium call for qualitative refinement of purpose. But to invested identity may feel like being crushed or deeply threatened, and invoke regressive contraction from life in a stricture of death, instead of to the seeding synchronicity for a new phase of expansion.

When we are triggered, we literally operate a dissociated and dissociating persona and are not in our right mind. Conditioned, triggered, and controlled by hated fears - or loved hates.

Releasing trauma, or conflicting elements set in grievance, is necessarily to revisit the triggering conditions in willingness to uncover new perspective that is wholly recognisable and understandable as an appreciation, shared.

Postscript:

KJE:

How much of that was actually In English? I could have filled a buzzword bingo card. Just sayin’

Hateful propaganda can be coined in English and believing we understand it can and does deliver us unto evil.
From where would you question your current presumptions, terms, conditions and demands that deliver you to the world you judge as real? Many not only don't question, nor does it ever actually occurred to them to do so. Nor can they follow any who do.

Covid-capture syndrome is a state of dissociation under which the subject simply refuses to see, hear, understand or accept anything that is not mandated by a lock-stepped mind.

It is the privilege of those who step outside of such locked down meanings, to be mistranslated by an intent to immunise against feared truth. Truth never has been locked into words, but embodies and is given witness in truly shared meanings. As distinct from 'Newspeak' in which anything means whatever Big Brother says it means today regardless what it meant yesterday or shall mean tomorrow.

When you sign off in feigned retreat as 'Just saying' you illustrate a way of undermining what you have to say in self depreciation. Perhaps to pre-empt someone else reacting in a way you don't want to have to engage with or stand up to? Why not say truly 'just' things and stand in them - while you are alive? Why not aspire to grow a better experience of yourself and your life instead of looking for something to 'relieve yourself' on?

Perhaps you can share what YOU see as motivating a huge and intentional contraction of the global economy set under draconian reaction to a pretext for panic, meekly followed and even applauded? Why would anyone choke back supply but to set controls over the lives and minds by conditioning the behaviour of another's 'normal"?

At the moment the political will is a Gated community.

We may choose or be moved to focus on any aspect and at any level of a rich drama unfolding, and that is our freedom. I take no less and no more than that, and share it to any who at least dimly recognise the drama operates a negative self-reinforcing loop. But if you have something to say - why don't you say it instead of dumping on those who - for your own reasons - you take offence from. Show that you are not 'just sayin' things to provoke division and distrust?

The Lockstepped Media

To the themes of a conversation in which a media brand was extolled as a worthy source of news.

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161909

You are still ok with the brand that 'suits you sir', but many have become aware that despite apparently taking turns to present some sort of plausible denial for being organs of state, (or of a captured and Gated 'state of affairs'), ALL of the established media brands are effectively the lock-stepped media. Unless you have awareness from outside the narratives of confinement you MUST seek and find your identity and thought within them.

I don't see any need to be hostile so much as essentially extend a disregard to what is only of interest in seeing what the mind-captured are being told to think or find diversion in.
But when something that is pretending to serve a public news service is lauded as if it really does - then it is put up to be pulled down.

The questioning of everything about this pretext for a globalist power grab that is  - as we speak - reorganising how government and society is to operate in its newly conditioned state mandated Paramount Safety - is  conspicuous by its absence from any officially accepted 'news source'.

Your example of merit is an extremely token 'challenge' to what is being rolled out over the destruction of civilisation as we have known it - and for all it faults and horrific underbelly - it still holds some continuity for unfolding the potentials of our human being.

By all means you are free to choose where to go for your information and support - and abide in who you feel yourself to be regardless the opinions and judgements of others.  It may be that people in any walk of life meet a line they are not willing to cross, or an integrity they are unwilling to forsake - and this might result in getting an article published despite editorial concerns - or after receiving editing to meet those concerns.

Hitchens and Sumption were willing to speak their genuine concerns into an emotionally generated storm. They are willing to debate rather than consent to the imposition of 'truth' that denies any real debate. The Telegraph was and is no less instrumental in pushing such a propaganda blitz as all the others. If you do not recognise war propaganda, you could review all of its behaviour with a critical discernment rather than already reacting to its payload.

Instead of taking steps to shift paradigm, the elites dig themselves into a much deeper set of denials as if fear and coercion can inaugurate a new world order. But they don't want anything truly new, so much a more effective ways to consolidate control from an illegitimate intent to possess. Because they can dictate new laws by which to protect their lack of substance only demonstrates or proves a lack of substance.

'Comply and conform or we will hurt you'.
also expressed as 'Your safety is our paramount concern'.
If you learned how to read bollox as bollox - you might be less willing to suckle poisoned milk.

I don't ask you to trust me or tell you I can be trusted - but extend trust TO you as worthy of an honouring communication - even if we disagree. Because communication and relationship are what is being targeted and sacrificed to a false god that can NOT protect, guide, support or sustain - excepting by the redistribution of human sacrifice to its demands as 'normal'.

to sow doubt, disinformation and distrust among the 'enemy'

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161493 

A stated aim of GCHQ cyber intelligence is to sow doubt, disinformation and distrust among the 'enemy'. It's not a new idea - but can take novel forms.

I watched a video of a conference (perhaps on the reproducibility of science - or similar) in which it was stated by the grave faced panel of speakers that about half the literature is wrong. But they don't know which half. This is a parallel with the bankers and toxic debts that seem to be assets with complex financial instruments.

Moral integrity is self-honesty that extends as a working practical trust in listening within as well as studying without.

Something that muddies the waters is a binary mindset or either or.

The answer to 'Is this or that good or bad for you?', is generally - 'it depends'.

The mind by itself cannot necessarily account for all the variables but can string together a working model. If we keep in mind it is a model then we don't invest it with reality.

I have a sense that uncovering our own questions and following them, will unfold our own journey from which we can grow in consciousness and connection - that frames better questions and answers as expression of a more open honest and confident consciousness. Freedom from self-doubt is not fixated self-certainties - but transparency and accountability. How honest we are willing to be is interesting in the light of wanting the same from our institutions, leaders and corporates.

Opening your own relationship with our Sun, can also open knowledge that studies cannot give you. But once you have inner territory of your own experience you have a basis for recognising qualities in others. I feel that relational resonance is the core of communication.

One man's meat is another man's poison.

And meat like bread was much more generic for food in the past.

Sharing your meat made you ... mates.

Curiously now we have trouble sharing food - a most ancient communion - because there is so much we don't eat, cant eat or wont eat. My foreboding is that soon very many of us may be a lot less fussy.

Our OWN mind is being used against us

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/21/the-anti-lockdown-strategy/?replytocom=160767#comment-160767 

Watch your thoughts; they become words.
Watch your words; they become actions.
Watch your actions; they become habits.
Watch your habits; they become character.
Watch your character; it becomes your destiny.
Lao Tzu

A key to our times is to see that our OWN mind is being used against us.

Without awakened responsibility for thought, we are unaware of the structures that are invisible to us because we think within - and out from - their framing automatically, or by habit.

The characteristic signature of such a ploy is a reversal of thought, assigned reality

While we do not have the ability to control Reality, our reality is filtered and interpreted by beliefs that operate as our social identity reinforcement - that can and does extend a capacity to deny a directly perceived or intuited reality in favour of a social compliance.

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!” – Upton Sinclair

The development of the ability to shape social narrative is associated with politics, propaganda, corporate PR, advertising and social engineering by a complex of such an 'industry'. It's very premise is to manipulate an outcome by whatever means work - and this is a result of a failure of communication or a REFUSAL to open a relationship of communication - which can simply arise from self-specialness - that can be expressed negatively as victim or threat, as well as positively in terms of denial, exclusion or overcoming of threat. Playing the victim or victims for leverage of control while asserting outrage at being questioned and accusing the questioner of moral depravity and demanding its denial. Offering the 'strongman' to a cultivated insecurity under threat. These patterns run in our own minds - not just in exemplary 'psychopaths' or lockstepping self-interests of the Establishment.

My sense is that to speak truth as power, we have to uncover truth in ourselves, rather than claim moral right to represent truth as a personal claim set over or against another.

To put this another way - we need to align thought, word and deed to a wholeness or congruency - lest we say one thing while doing another. This correction will never occur under a blame and shame, or 'guilting and sacrificing' culture. Truth HAS to include self-acceptance as a current state or a 'supportive cast' for self-evasion will sow and reap an imposed partiality instead of consciously accepted open preference.