Showing posts with label Narrative Control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Narrative Control. Show all posts

Monday, 4 May 2020

to sow doubt, disinformation and distrust among the 'enemy'

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161493 

A stated aim of GCHQ cyber intelligence is to sow doubt, disinformation and distrust among the 'enemy'. It's not a new idea - but can take novel forms.

I watched a video of a conference (perhaps on the reproducibility of science - or similar) in which it was stated by the grave faced panel of speakers that about half the literature is wrong. But they don't know which half. This is a parallel with the bankers and toxic debts that seem to be assets with complex financial instruments.

Moral integrity is self-honesty that extends as a working practical trust in listening within as well as studying without.
Something that muddies the waters is a binary mindset or either or.
The answer to 'Is this or that good or bad for you?', is generally - 'it depends'.
The mind by itself cannot necessarily account for all the variables but can string together a working model. If we keep in mind it is a model then we don't invest it with reality.

I have a sense that uncovering our own questions and following them, will unfold our own journey from which we can grow in consciousness and connection - that frames better questions and answers as expression of a more open honest and confident consciousness. Freedom from self-doubt is not fixated self-certainties - but transparency and accountability. How honest we are willing to be is interesting in the light of wanting the same from our institutions, leaders and corporates.

Opening your own relationship with our Sun, can also open knowledge that studies cannot give you. But once you have inner territory of your own experience you have a basis for recognising qualities in others. I feel that relational resonance is the core of communication.
One man's meat is another man's poison.
And meat like bread was much more generic for food in the past.
Sharing your meat made you ... mates.


Curiously now we have trouble sharing food - a most ancient communion - because there is so much we don't eat, cant eat or wont eat. My foreboding is that soon very many of us may be a lot less fussy.

Private-public partnership - PR spin set over corporate governance

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161485 

In general of course - you write to the facts - but there were a number of points in that long quote - that are too many to go into here.

What is the private-public partnership idea but PR spin set over corporate governance?
Gates and UK Gov are actively and openly engaged in such - but 'save our NHS' is used to divert from any real scrutiny by means of sideshow politics run by crisis actors.

The Military Industrial Government post ww2 initiated Big Ag as on a par with energy control.
Energy control was already too big for government to hold in check or to account in the USA - with cartel power (Rockefeller et al) then expanding to capture and monopolise the medical system - and capture the regulators so as to protect its interests against the people.
The corruption of our thought is part of social engineering and mind control.
If the idea of mind control sounds to weird - call it narrative control. Call it deceit.

So I recognise the false deification of grievance, offence and proxy victims, as the leverage to assert righteous vengeance, under pretence of moral authority, and the sacrifice of the demonised individual to the manufactured collective - and etc - but am not at all inclined to assign a label such as neo-liberal, as an actual cause or agency and take identity in polarised reaction against it.

 I look beneath that to the 'mind' that is targeted, manipulated and run by a loveless or hateful agenda for its own gratification. And to the predatory instinct of 'winning' by attacking first in some trojan ploy.

I read this text below today - and it speaks to our situation - does it not?

“The dissolving and reformation of new unity is quite different from destructive divisions, which are counter to the harmonies of life. Division is characterized by its resistance to growth and by its use of judgment and conflict to retard the power of unity. Perpetrators of division regard change as threatening, and therefore will infuse into the elements of change as much hostility or perversion as the situation will bear. Division is easily observed in war and in criminal aggressions. Although, most influences of division are more subtle than that. What you need to know about the world in which you live is that its stagnancy is not due to complexity or even chaos—those conditions can actually hold dynamic potential. Stagnation is actually due to many forces of division that are passively held in equilibrium. That is counterfeit unity. True unity comes from establishing correct priorities in life, and that begins with realizing there is but one God."

I am not interested in polarised God/Science opinionating. But nor am I self-censoring sense just to fit in with 'scientific correctness'.

One either recognises value in this quote or not - which I hold to be without any 'appeal to authority' or abuse of the idea of a true Cause as a patented or doctrinal straight jacket of lock-stepped mind-control.