To the themes of a conversation in which a media brand was extolled as a worthy source of news.
You are still ok with the brand that 'suits you sir', but many have become aware that despite apparently taking turns to present some sort of plausible denial for being organs of state, (or of a captured and Gated 'state of affairs'), ALL of the established media brands are effectively the lock-stepped media. Unless you have awareness from outside the narratives of confinement you MUST seek and find your identity and thought within them.
I don't see any need to be hostile so much as essentially extend a disregard to what is only of interest in seeing what the mind-captured are being told to think or find diversion in.
But when something that is pretending to serve a public news service is lauded as if it really does - then it is put up to be pulled down.
The questioning of everything about this pretext for a globalist power grab that is - as we speak - reorganising how government and society is to operate in its newly conditioned state mandated Paramount Safety - is conspicuous by its absence from any officially accepted 'news source'.
Your example of merit is an extremely token 'challenge' to what is being rolled out over the destruction of civilisation as we have known it - and for all it faults and horrific underbelly - it still holds some continuity for unfolding the potentials of our human being.
By all means you are free to choose where to go for your information and support - and abide in who you feel yourself to be regardless the opinions and judgements of others. It may be that people in any walk of life meet a line they are not willing to cross, or an integrity they are unwilling to forsake - and this might result in getting an article published despite editorial concerns - or after receiving editing to meet those concerns.
Hitchens and Sumption were willing to speak their genuine concerns into an emotionally generated storm. They are willing to debate rather than consent to the imposition of 'truth' that denies any real debate. The Telegraph was and is no less instrumental in pushing such a propaganda blitz as all the others. If you do not recognise war propaganda, you could review all of its behaviour with a critical discernment rather than already reacting to its payload.
Instead of taking steps to shift paradigm, the elites dig themselves into a much deeper set of denials as if fear and coercion can inaugurate a new world order. But they don't want anything truly new, so much a more effective ways to consolidate control from an illegitimate intent to possess. Because they can dictate new laws by which to protect their lack of substance only demonstrates or proves a lack of substance.
'Comply and conform or we will hurt you'.
also expressed as 'Your safety is our paramount concern'.
If you learned how to read bollox as bollox - you might be less willing to suckle poisoned milk.
I don't ask you to trust me or tell you I can be trusted - but extend trust TO you as worthy of an honouring communication - even if we disagree. Because communication and relationship are what is being targeted and sacrificed to a false god that can NOT protect, guide, support or sustain - excepting by the redistribution of human sacrifice to its demands as 'normal'.
No comments:
Post a Comment