Back to Normal - Conditioning can, and does, normalise anything

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/12/the-lockdown-is-not-a-way-of-beating-this-virus/?replytocom=161091#comment-161091 

I ask you to define more what you mean by normal.

Please.

We are being deliberately conditioned in my experience.

This isn't just ineptitude - but that isn't to say fools are not easily led.

To some, normal means a protected sense of control over the conditions of life and over others who might contest that and seek to 'take it back' - especially when their lives are at stake.

The breakdown of a false economy - or indeed a false medical model thus calls for a rstatement or reiteration of controls set over the lives of others - ostensibly masked in terms of others' safety being their paramount concern.

The linkage of covid with the 'Economy' is not arbitrary, but implicit.

Covid is being used as a pretext to contract and reshape the Economy - along the lines of a blueprint for a centrally planned (global) system of controls.

There can be no going back - even should the 'control agenda' fail to anticipate the living response. But culture is not a top down conditioning - unless you give unto Caesar that which belongs to the living. Culture is the expression of shared value or worth.

If normalcy drifts from a real relationship, it becomes hollow ritual that makes a sense of security out of numbness or cultivated indifference. At some point the 'denied' are bashing down your doors or rising up from beneath what you took to be your ground.

And so a crisis of adjustment is at hand - which does not have to be set in anyone else's agenda.

Fear that needs to be attended may be where answers are found, and fears that operate a diversionary circus ensure  that you are never found out.

Finding discernment in what seems a violating or obnoxious confusion is a matter of clearly setting priorities rather than comparing everything to a lost past. If you don't, someone else will set them for you.

I prefer natural to normal - but recognise that we all identify in and are adapted to an overlay of strategies of a learned and acquired 'nature'. When the mask slips - or contracts - we are interrupted in an otherwise unquestioned identity. Some seek any means to cover over what is exposed - and others seek a more transparent and open way of living from awakening sense of responsibility. How will we balance or integrate these desires? Or is the sacrifice of the living to run 'business as normal' for a primacy of fear and control?

Thanks for your post.

PS your questions on testing were addressed to a 'real' doctor. But as an undoctored bystander I see no proof of a new virus, nor of it being The Cause of A disease, nor of its virulence or contagion - so much as a pandemic of testing - that indeed could be finding tiny amounts of something that is said to be a 'close match' to a unique identifying RNA string of whatever has been defined and designated as Sars-Cov-2 - and assigned such novel properties as to have any or no clinical symptoms, or to mutate and adapt to any narrative twist.

In 1984 antibodies became the proof of infection instead of immunity for a new approach in virology. WHO decides? So you are already running with the bait of a set of assumptions that deny you the ability to zoom out and question - as I see it.

PCR is NOT a valid diagnostic test. It is worse than useless for such purpose and therefore useful to those who abuse it by treating it as if its results meant 'infection, disease or contagion'.

But on such does a global control agenda pivot.