waking other people up is another form of virtue signalling

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161683 

On best ways to promote vaccine risk awareness

Are you presuming a right to force people to accept that they are willingly putting their children in harm's way - by an expression of their protective love?

The idea of waking other people up is another form of virtue signalling is it not?

When people are ready they are already coming into contact with information or experience from outside their bubble. Perhaps if they are not ready, they focus on the self-righteous pushiness (such as we can all at some time enact), that reinforces retreat and defence instead of willingness to listen.

The art of discerning the true will in others and joining them might first honour their current choice as their right, without reinforcing it as right. In relationships we are always a beginner - or else we jump in with assumptions taken from another context. I quite understand that our own emotional outrage is both maddening and unhelpful - unless it can be channelled to learning how better to be a channel or serve a channel of communication.

However, Elizabeth is exemplifying an approach that may find a willingness to listen - or at least seed to possibility of questioning an accepted certainty, or emotionally invested  commitment.

As soon as we engage in our own moral judgement of others - rather than illuminate the questionable, fraudulent or destructive behaviour of others, we muddy our own signal  by using it to get satisfaction of an emotional charge dump - and often with the signal smugness of believing that just for now, we put them in their place!

Much of the pharmaceutical and perhaps all of the 'biological' or vaccination issue rests on a model of disease as pathogenically CAUSED by microbiota and viruses, along with a model of immunity as a battle set against such malign 'hijackers'.

A cat and mouse game between system and hacker operates the progressive lockdown and lock-in of the user. By the way - the Internet is essential for the implementation and maintaining and normalising of lockdown and lockstepping compliance.

'Where Do You Want To Go Today?' said the Spider to the fly.

How far upstream to the cascade of symptoms and whack-a-mole displacement effects are we willing to question?

Within any issue is the liability to become define by what you oppose, resist or disagree with - sometimes quite invisibly. That's why the information we need to take our next step is often hidden in or behind the forms of what we deny, or hold anathema.

Malcolm X is quoted to have said: “I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I'm a human being, first and foremost, and as such I'm for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.”

Identity investments will absolutely block and lock in a negative confirmation bias. Such that if someone or something representative of what you are against says it - it MUST be a matter of opposition and ridicule.

It isn't the rich who cant let themselves into heaven, but those who mistake their identity-investment as riches set over truth.