Repeating the Big Lie...

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/#comment-146069 

Repeating the Big Lie...

“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”

~ Alan Bullock, in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives

Another relevant quote is Mark Twain; "it is easier to deceive than it is to convince people they have been deceived". The corollary is that those who wake to the deceit are often very angry - and where the deceit is part of wrecking children's lives - enraged. Del Bigtree is of the US cultural 'TV show' mentality - it doesn't suit the English psyche - well not mine anyway.  Wakefield is very measured and communicates clearly.

Kennedy deserves subtitles. He is very level headed regardless to emotional nature of human experimentation carried out without scientific transparency and accountability.

After Nazism took ALL the can for eugenics and inhuman genocides the Nuremberg trials resulted in laws being passed against medical experimentation in living human beings without informed consent. Mandatory vaccination breaks those laws and is entirely consistent with Nazism - although there are many post Nazi examples of other such coercive behaviour in the US and doubtless around the world.

The underlying beliefs associated with vaccination are a religion - that is they are placed outside the scope of independent scientific enquiry and open public debate. Anyone trained medically learns what NOT to say or that going there is hazardous to their career.

The same may soon be true of 'climate politics'. This is nothing to do with science and everything to do with the power to persist in asserting a narrative control - ie the Big Lie is repeated and woven into any and every kind of 'news, article or study'. You are hopelessly naive in your trust in the media or medical profession's capacity to give true witness. But then you are spared the emotional turmoil of knowing what goes on beneath appearances.

A Mind As If Split From Its Body And World, Set Within Its Own Tale-Spin

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/09/what-causes-heart-disease-a-summary/

Why stop at damage to the endothelium? Why not address 'damage' or degradation of the blood? Perhaps significant but if Pollack is as reproducibly proven in his EZ water demonstrations - as also applies in cells and arteries - along with all protein-activated phase changes - then is this vicinal (endothelial) charge-gradient a factor? I cant see why NOT.

Vit C and other antioxidants are supply of free electrons - yes?

My interest is in a recognition of our Universe and therefore our life - as having an electrical nature that then operates as complex self-organising Open 'system' of balanced energies, structure and in our case consciousness - excepting that you might say we have lost our balance in terms of a mind that is as if split from its body and Universe and set within its own tale-spin - as a negatively polarised or fear-defined sense of self and world. And somewhat invisibly so in a society of mutual reinforcement.

I am certain that shocks in life or trauma - can and does 'store' in the body in various ways and places - and can be reactivated or triggered by all manner of events.

Persistent as well as acute toxicity is also a shock.

As one who has experience in opening the consciousness (and also of experiencing trauma), I see a normalisation of fear that is otherwise invisible. Any unresolved issues can seek magical remedy in displacements that cannot address the cause but can and will bring all the elements of the original issue into the arena of the 'cure'. Who is listening?

How much attention is given to the truth of love in gosh knows how many pages and comments on CVD - Heart disease. It is in these pages and comments but 

Science tends to operate behind the scenes - in theory of mechanism - where people mostly live front-end user interface generated by currently accepted narrative identity that may base itself on such theories - which are hardly settled Fact an more than theologies.

While many are re-educating themselves after realising a lot of such is more of a top down 'economy' if not racket than a true service - most haven a basis from which to start and grow confidence - and so its a matter of which 'experts' to follow. However, intuition comes into this and there is a difference between those who risk their career or peer credibility in aligning in integrity as they find it relative to following a 'standard of care' that is backed by trillion dollar marketing companies - except to the layman - billion dollar research would find a cure if there was one - ergo - there isn't one - but its in the pipeline - just keep the funds coming.

I don't know that Jerome will reach many who are not already in a sense on board with the 'anti-statin insurgency'. I use that term after reading a paper at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.02103.pdf

Titled: Health Wars and Beyond: The Rapidly Expanding and Efficient Network Insurgency Interlinking Local and Global Online Crowds of Distrust.

Re-education is not just facts' but growing consciousness as to the way to gather and the purpose of application of what is uncovered and currently accepted as a basis from which to live -  while always open to further insight. A 'narrative identity' is generally a 'For and Against' sense of self that is generally For whatever supports Against. This is a blind binary polarisation that cannot  really think at all. When there is no life being lived and shared, what is not used fades by non use - and what is resisted persists.

Electric Heartbeat

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

 I realise I might be repeating an old question already answered somewhere in the last fifty something blog posts but in considering the very basic elements of death by heart failure, I see this whole argument being one of a faulty plumbing system - albeit a self repairing one.

Is it considered that the heart fails because a blockage in the arteries stops the blood flow and starves all organs including the heart of energy to maintain function?

I have read that many who die of a 'heart attack' are found without such blockages' and many who die of other causes are found to have such blockages.

The heart is electrical in its operation and communicates electro-magnetic field potentials - which is how the heart function can be electrically recorded by a cardiogram. There are also heart diseases associated with electrical failure of the heart. Electrical fluctuations in our atmosheric conditions as a result of Solar activity are known to have correspondence with heart 'attacks' whether via block or by interference in the tock of its clock - or pacemaker cells.

So is the blockage itself the cause of death or are their other factors that often or almost always accompany it? The heart stops - but is that because a spanner is in the pump?

Science often specialises and begins to suggest that life happens in different compartments and every specialist defends their field against intrusion by other fields. This pattern is itself not unique to science but a specialisation of a human tendency or mental sense of control.

Science as a technologism of 'define in order to predict and control' can and does serve compartmentalised or private agenda at expense of the whole.

I have a sense that the heart is in some sense a like a conductor to its orchestra,for a synchrony of functional communication, regulation and exchange. I also have a sense that victorian science - like lead plumbing, remains in place at the cost of more integrative understandings as a primitive makeover on older superstitions that persist in an Emperor's new clothing that cannot be questioned without self-invalidating. Not that thermodynamics is not capable of  explaining and accounting for a lot of practical mechanism in physics and in biology - but that there is a contextual layer that it is blind to in the realm of electromagnetic self organising fields of communication that are not themselves physical so much as interfacing qualities to quantities and vice versa and that a primary aspect of renewal, support, immunity, vitality, inspiration, energy and joy in living and sharing life is a connectivity at all levels.

The physical experience is not a risk of death so much as having death built in by design in support of life. But note the phrase physical experience combines two orders of reality within the quality and qualities of life. We also have non-physical experience of imagination and thought that if we observed our self in any day, occupies us more than our real-time relational environment. We live IN our model or image of reality as part of our survival in the body and can and do identify our survival with the image or model and not just the body - and can and do die or sicken as a result of shocks relative to experience of fears, threats and attacks or losses to our self as worldview and ability or acceptability and inclusion.

All kinds of self strategy against personal loss of face, power, status or social inclusion operate the complexities of human manipulative intent and thus of politics in all spheres of life including medical science as a funded institutional identity seeking its own survival in such terms.

Toxicity can be an ignorance - no one knew asbestos was deadly - but when they did the powers that be looked the other way and made it a toxicity by negligence and design - knowingly persisting in deadly hazards for the unwitting until law suits called the tune perhaps. Our world is in many ways toxic relative to dosage and duration - along with resilience and capacity to clear whatever and regain balance or function. Fever is a way the body responds to a toxic shock - but we tend to see fever as the disease - along with the itis and the associated bacterial or virological condition.

Back to heavy metal poisoning - is there a reliable affordable way of testing for this? I wonder because these can also be laid down in fats that may then be dormant - until or unless released back into circulation.

Lead toxicity heart disease

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

Note lead is being used as one of a class of toxic metals - that are also neurotoxic.

So what are the metals or similar-acting toxins that effect either the damage or the interference in the capacity to defend, repair, and renew?

I suggest aluminium is also a candidate. There are a range of other known toxins that I also submit as candidates. I just read the study on pesticides as the most likely cause of 'Havana Syndrome'.

In short toxic exposures are systemic and pervasive with regional variations. Regs on pesticides or any other health protection are either non existent or overridden by multinational corporate agenda. Banned toxins are simply resold in other 'markets'. This includes vaccines known to harm.

But the key theme is that toxicity is built in to our way of life.

You note leaded petrol - eventually phased out but only being used because it was patented - not for any functional necessity. Lead is still in our mains water supply - and some areas have very toxic water. (Flint, Michigan etc).

Much of this in my opinion is a result of centralisation requiring a top down imposition of systemic organisation running on deductive reasoning rather than inductive observations and re-alignment.

In Malcolm's metaphor, control itself is the centre piece of its own framing - as an interjection and substitution for what comes naturally - or rather the way nature actually works.

The establishment of kings, high priesthoods and power class thereof became the model of the self - as a top down control of the self-mind-brain over its body. We have it backwards - but are all in the idea of control over life as something fundamentally threatening, treacherous and opposition to our fantasy of how things should be - and which forms the basis of the ideas we presume and internalise as true that then 'force all the other pieces out of shape'.

Hence restoring our own true shape by releasing the false frame of unquestioned reality that is in fact believed and perceived confirmation bias - allows other pieces to find us as part of a reintegrative wholeness or coherency.

The other side of the story to toxicity is cellular of functional immunity.

How can we be more resilient in our capacity to neutralise and recover from toxic shocks that may be an event running on top of persistent background exposure?

I see this as more than a shopping list of todo's.

And there is huge evidence to suggest that the degradation of human population is by design - sometimes as the 'side effects' of higher profits but also as a more stupid and less troublesome populace and also Malthusian stealth.

Alas, opening to the larger picture can in itself be a factor for heart failure for deep fear, horror or indeed rage can all serve as toxic or inflammatory attack on the body.

I understand that IV vit C - and perhaps other antioxidants - can neutralise the acute risk of fatality from toxic exposures of some kinds.

I also understand that we can die from our defences rather than the attack or problem itself. This has become extrapolated to human society as iatrogenic disease as well as many unexpected effects of solving problems that unwittingly generate new problems by displacement.

Mercury poisoning was once the applied remedy of the 'quicks' those physicians who purged the disease with poisons such as quicksilver, (mercury). This is indeed in the original meaning of pharma as both poison and remedy.

While not advocating the example, there are some who accept potentially poisonous snake bites as part of their Sunday service without dying. There is more going on than meets the eye.

It is my sense that toxicity is the basis of disease and that what we call infection is in fact the body's attempt to heal or clear it. But because we associate infection with pathological (evil) viruses - we have a contagion of fear that generates its own 'defence system' - often to protect the cause (of sickness) by attacking the effects (symptoms interpreted as attack).

Fear can mount on fear to an inflammation of hysterical breakdown of communication - as we are seeing in our current affairs and inability to sanely address them.

So at the least I suggest that there is an inner and and outer part to all these things  but the inner is the art of hiding itself in internalised presumptions of asserted and believed reality.

Calcium does have a necessary role

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

But calcium does have a necessary role in its due place and timing does it not?

Calcification is an ossification of rigidity that has its own parallel in human thought and attitude.

I see loss of balance as a summation of disease - including a balance that can hold all manner of  imbalances within itself. Indeed the Universe can be seen as a perfectly balanced disequilibrium in motion. Perhaps finding our right place and timing is finding a dynamic balance point - that of course can never be written out as a prescription or on stone tablets.

We are trying to do much of what the body was designed to do - maintain functional balance or homeostasis. But from an externalised presumption of objectivity by which to then enforce the puzzle to fit our pieces.

Victort of such a system is well represented by a comment overheard in oncology; "Well we lost the patient - but we got the cancer!".

I suppose if humans didn't exist God would have to make them up.

The systems of regulation are hacked. IE Dysregulation. In political terms this is called 'regulatory capture'. Parasites are known to be able to repurpose their host to serve their agenda - and in some sense so is a cancer. What is the condition that attracts and is open to parasitic symbiosis or to the disconnected growth that no longer receives support and operates as its own separate survival without connective communication?

I haven't researched it in any depth but the assertion of the calcification of the pineal gland being the shutting down of a greater field of communication and support in life can be seen as a means maintaining the darkness in which a 'survival response' can persist as a system of control - or parasitic growth at expense of that which gives and shares life.

For want of better words a field of bio-regulation operates at various levels and various speeds - up to the electromagnetic impulses at the speed of light - ie in nanoseconds - across the whole and not as a top down hierarchy of control.

I recall a car sticker: "Designed by computer. built by robots. driven by morons" or something very similar. At some level I see this as part of freedom to be tooled and fooled instead of appreciating and extending the gift. Insofar as the body is a tool what would its function be serving?

(I have sympathy for the idea that the body prefers calcium from the transmutation of silica - which may seem far out but has some support. I also have the idea that pasteurized milk has destroyed the enzymes necessary for the assimilation of its calcium content. However, I have a conscious bias toward anything the mainstream seeks to deny - as a part of the larger picture that doesn't fit because the mind-framing denies it a place.