Disinformation By Contagion

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=148055#respond 

Commeter:

Very interesting article here concerning antibody suppression after measles infection, which you have mentioned. Seems we need have no fear, and that this is a good thing the body does in its infinite wisdom. Let me know what you think.

http://www.tetyanaobukhanych.com/blog/should-you-be-afraid-that-measles-gives-you-immune-amnesia

in response to the themes above:

The PR running from the study on Measles 'undermining immunity' is a weaponised headline with apparently supporting text. If you find any journalist doing any job of checking or even engaging with the articles they copy paste - let me know.

I went to the study and skimmed it.

Does one laugh or cry?

Bankers and lawyers and scientists are trained to repackage toxic debt (consequence of their acts) into something they can induce others to buy.

Is there an online translator for language intended to obfuscate?

I agree with your link and with Thomas Cowan in that immunity is not what we think it is (or are told to accept it to be), and so there is an extension of a flawed model or actively believed hypothesis that the study suffers by inheritance.

Then there is the sample size from which to derive such dramatic conclusions - single figures appeared later that didn't correlate to the several hundred at the opening??

The dubious nature of the control group given flu vaccine??

I'm sure Malcolm could make a shortlist of flaws, misrepresentations or weaknesses - but I would rather he educate others in practicing doing so.

If there is substance to argument it can come out unafraid of being challenged - indeed it should welcome any critical perspective so as NOT to deal in misinformation unwittingly.

By challenge I don't mean ad-hom and smear tactics.

Easier to steal the gold in Fort Knox than bring vaccine science to a true accountability - although I have my doubts that there is any in there.

Good to mention the overall death by any cause figure.

I regard a study as false until demonstrated otherwise.

Particularly when selected and weaponised to protect such overwhelmingly powerful vested interests.

'They' are insistent on wanting mandatory vaccination on humans as legally enshrined and protected. It has nothing to do with caring - excepting to manipulate the sympathies of those who do. 

Otherwise why hide from Science and why deny open and honouring relational debate and education? Many NEED to believe they are 100% right in this because if they are wrong they are complicit in a horrifying abuse of trust. That's one reason to have 'Science' - to thoroughly check that what we think is so - is truly as we think - or not. If there is any reasonable doubt - don't force it on anyone by law or by incentivised coercion - such as vaccinate or take your kids out of school.  But if 'they' are right because they say so and because you have no say, then you KNOW the nature of what is wearing the white coat, the banker's suit, the political office, or the environmental concern. 

You may not be able to always deny vaccinations against your will or any other physical or medical or psychological abuse. But you can align with immunity to deceit by loving truth and letting the rest go.

I was sad to see BBCH (BUILDING BRIDGES IN CHILDREN’S HEALTH) - in your linked article - costing £100 p.a - but I suppose it is for professionals and not the laity...

PS IF Measles CAN reset secondary immunity relating to past exposures it may be very useful as a treatment for people with dysfunctional immune responses?

Do we die from the 'disease' or from our defences...?