"Given the infectiousness of the virus"

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/?replytocom=160986#comment-160986 

I read this phrase; "given the infectiousness of the virus".

This is what I read from it;  Infection based on accepting the results of tests for RNA fragments of even very very tiny quantities of genetic code said to match or nearly match unique identifiers in a 'novel virus' supposedly discovered or determined from material taken from a few sick people in Wuhan that has not been isolated or purified in any real sense of the word, nor passed Koch's postulates, nor proven to be causation for a disease that HAS no distinct clinical profile.

Movie scenes: 1. A man gets on a horse. 2. Silhouette of man riding horse in distance. 3.Man and horse come to a halt at building. 4. Man dismounts and ties horse to rail.

The movie audience consents to be taken for a big ride. Most of the movie is in the mind of the audience - only a few props, suggestions and intentions set the drama in motion.

What then is going on but a pandemic of testing and fear driven assumptions of virulent contagion in a climate of fear that drives disproportionate and treatments and denials of treatments that are both assigned to the 'powerful disease' ?

The power of belief is its OWN reality, while being given power in the mind of shared agreement.

In the past - and around the world, many have and do believe and live the belief of things you would consider unbelievable or groundless. But are you so certain that what you believe today will in fact be found true when all the drama has passed?

History is written by the victor to support the claim or right to power - even in real-time, as our sense of narrative continuity and self-justification.

Are we not weaponising and marketising the cold/flu season as a means to use risk of infection as a basis for political and social controls unprecedented in our known history - on a global scale?

The viral contagion of fear activating code re-framing our mind works the deceiving of our thought and not the natural processes of the physical body.

Once invested in, emotionally and financially, running on false premises will persist as the momentum of its investment. Fear dictates the controls.

You may debate as to whether chicken licken and foxy loxy work as a team - or whether he always shows up as a random opportunist, but when the leaders of society and its media enact the headless chicken syndrome to cry "WOLF!", all parental and societal obedience training is invoked to take it seriously and presume it has substance.

Once invested in a lie, no true answer can be found until it is re-cognised or re evaluated and released from its status as ‘true’. While truth is feared, the lie runs as protection racket.

The fact of being denied the freedom to question an apparent or asserted fact, by setting the questioning as the 'dangerous threat to society' is all the proof required to illuminate fear in hiding - protected by a body of defences properly belonging to a transparency of communication in shared purpose.

Truth is not threatened by criticism and questioning.

'Post truth' social policy threatens criticism and questioning.

It only ‘asks’ in statements put in the form of question, or to frame a real question in an invalidating context.

If you WANT a lie to be true for you, then you have to be willing to deny truth in your own heart - in other words you know but don't want to know, and so give no attention or response.

The mind-worm says there is no 'truth' - but without truth - all is lawlessly and hatefully chaotic.

Hate may then become the sign of the need for for healing - but only when re-cognised as hurt, broken and betrayed love.

If we blame lovelessness on the choices of others - we lose the consciousness of HAVING choice!

Discovery Of A Novel Virus Is The First Thing To Question

Note: I have lost the reference to the context of this - but fairly sure it was on Malcolm's blog.

its basis was to question the validity of not of the test being used or the potential to make it more reliable so as to put the whole thing to rest and get back to normal. In other words the question saw the testing as the key to finding out what is really going on.

I suggest that the 'discovery' of a novel virus is the first assertion or assumption to be thoroughly investigated - not just as asserted and defined but as a proven cause of one condition - that is being presented as a specific disease without clinical symptoms in about half the population. Doesn't that ring doublespeak alarm bells for you?

The primary 'weapon' at work is the framing of the mind of definitions by which to distribute meanings that are emotionally 'loaded' with fear, blame and penalty.

Of course science is supposed to be empirically verifiable peer reviewed reproducible fact.

But all ideas evolve by their application and acceptance to become a basis of justification for the maintaining of narratives by which to evade and direct fear, blame and penalty.

Any system is only as good or workable as the integrity of those who run it. Collective evasion operates as socially invisible.

That somewhat separated out virus cultures are subjected to every kind of mutating effect - including now by splicing new code is simply fact. Probably resulting in auto-immune dysfunction - along with other exposures that undermine cellular integrity.

That viruses are not actually purely isolated in the way the layperson might imagine, means a soup of code fragments that can be from anywhere can be 'made sense of' or interpreted by consensus of an elite specialisation of employed or funded technicians as the 'official discovery' and held as THE standard and definition for tests, diagnosis, and interventions or treatments, to be derived.

Part of this includes the ability to 'clone' the interpreted viral code entity and then use it as the research model. This clone may then leak or simply be communicated into the 'wild'.

Note that if you run PCR test enough times you get 100% positive.

Note - the percentage of matching code required for 'identification' is variable at anything from 60-80% - and may include short sequences that may in fact NOT be unique to one so far 'discovered virus' out of trillions and so this is all a matter of  probabilities at best and programmed 'answer' at worst, with guesswork sitting somewhere in between.

The pathological virological model used is backwards in assigning agency to the code itself (virus). i sketch this out to invite a basis from which to question - rather than automatically run, a pathological belief on your operating system, by which 'Troy' is rendered defenceless from within.