Unfit to Live

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-84790 

In Rwanda those deemed unfit to live were called 'cockroaches' and therefore vermin control was encouraged to replace any moral sense, and of course being seen to defend the hated is to become associated with them and their fate. ("Who is not with us is against us"). I believe this mentality enables the likes of Pharma to perpetrate genocide, without qualm. But it isn't only in such corporate institutions. The idea that humans are like a virus on the planet and deserve to be culled is widespread. Eugenics never went away, it only changed its form.

Once we are willing to blank (the humanity of) under by name-magic, every kind of cruelty becomes possible or even righteously espoused. As if one can 'personalise' hated attributes (in oneself) and kill them or drive them out on the scapegoat. But it is the basic underlying 'religion' of getting someone ELSE to pay for the consequence of one's own error - so as to remain 'free' to persist in error. Appeasing the 'gods' to live another day and hatred of guilt does demand that someone PAY!

I prefer to challenge the thoughts and not the personal motives assigned or projected onto the thinker. I challenge anyone propagating the idea that hate-named others are 'unfit to live' as a valid or meaningful currency of discourse. Something in the heart's operation is different as a result of forgiveness or release of the personal sense of victim and vendetta. Much less stress and strain in a freedom to be who we are, by releasing others of what we thought we needed them to be.

Heart attack is an opposite to heart acceptance, whether strain over time or a sudden sense of violation- such as trauma of loss.

"Well a man hears, what he wants to hear, and he disregards the rest" ~ Simon and Garfunkel: The Boxer.

I don't believe you. But if you say so. So it is for you by your own volition.

If communication is your understanding of the purpose of language - then you may engage in a relationship of willingness. Apart from Malcolm - I have yet to receive a welcome (though I haven't read all the latest i/c). But that is not my point or where I am coming from in contributing to the undoing of the causes of heart disease.

So if communication means 'group-think' then of course I am coming out from left field. I simply do not subscribe to the beliefs that you take as true - but I do not attack or denigrate you for believing them. You may believe you are attacked and so act as you do - but where, in what way - how or exactly what?

If you simply don't relate to anything I am saying - which overlaps and joins with many commenters here in the themes of heart health and sickness - then go about your own business.

The fact that you engage with me means you do have resonance - albeit negatively. But apart from insisting you can't read english unless it ticks all your boxes and jumps through your hoops, you say nothing of substance - but seek to invalidate my own posting by smear. Perhaps a group of you will make consensus of settled science, and get Malcolm to stop letting me post. But I regard such behaviour as hysterical or without any basis in fact.

But it is simply observable that where vested interests operates, communication cannot get through if it is seen to undermine or threaten that investment. When you bemoan the capture and corruption of the medical system, you assign a hateful or evil intent. But here you are in the same sort of mode. Why?

Boosting what?

What on earth are you on about?

There is life outside and beyond the realm of your current scope - that you will one day celebrate!

I don't believe you read me with willingness to understand - but I am always willing to be wrong.

Here is something tailored to who you present yourself as:

What you are accepting as 'your thoughts' are not truly your own. But by accepting them and protecting them as if they are you, your true thoughts are denied. This mind-capture is something you assign to 'sheeple' - AS IF the same does not apply to you. There's the deceit from which an arrogance presumes to judge others. Theres how to stay in a game while pretending to wake up! Boosting your status in your own game.

Perhaps you are willing to pause all of that and look to your own heart - however you feel or imagine your heart within you - and find a love for humanity - even though we are currently such a disappointment to you. Any spark will suffice.

If you are willing to do this, you will also uncover the thought inside your heart that aligns against your peace - as hatred of whatever storyline, but you will find the recognition of that which is true of you - and as worthy of you as of everyone. Give it to know you have it.

One of the values of the saying - "as a man thinketh, so he is'  is to use it backwards: 

What I am currently experiencing myself and life to be (in this or any situation) is a result of what I am thinking and accepting in my heart. If I am depressed, threatened, conflicted or under strain, I can look within as the curiosity as to how and why I am defining myself, in this or that situation.  Is it true? What do I believe I am getting out of believing this? No blame. Just a desire for release of conflicted strain of sickness and stress management. Any step is an advance for humanity in withdrawing allegiance to thinking that keeps us in conflict, darkness, and great strain.

Is this not using the scientific method of enquiry to the faithful feedback of our whole experience - because our experience OF anything is always a filtered interpretation.

In the UK it is simple to buy actual cinnamon rather than the substitute.

We buy organic spices that to the best of our knowing have not been irradiated to favour the storage and distribution sector.

In US - I have the sense that freedom to not label, mislabel or lie cheat and steal is protected under the first amendment - when you are a corporate cartel, But not when suggesting or repeating that anything non pharmaceutical is any kind of treatment of cure for any kind of pharma-treatable disease.

Incidentally - on UK death statistics I noted the sections for "vaccine preventable diseases".

As to not using the law where it may still hold a check or account because "There's nothing you can do that will make any difference", I ask - is this your thought that you can stand in and give a full witness to - or is it something 'the pharma' cultivates in his crop?

A lot of what runs a sick system is the use of laws of contract. I believe we need the law and need to use it and regain a law that serves the whole instead of not as a weapon by private agenda upon the whole.

No bullying going on as far as I am concerned! You need a victim for that.

But as a behaviour, smearing anyone else with insinuation that they are 'not fit to walk the planet' is an expression and incitement to hate. I am surprised it passed moderation.But it has - and so why not use it as an educational opportunity.

How readily people can align in hate because fear of the stranger decided I am a 'troll'.

When you really want to learn a better way than war to heal your heart, you will read WITH your heart. I have offered no one offence here, nor engaged in trolling to smear, spread disinfo, incite hate and division or lead into energy drain of futile arguments intended to set others in a bad light. My first posts were over enthusiastic. I reread them and recognised that they failed to convey the meaning I intended to convey. Not that they were absent of heartfelt meanings. So I have checked and edited more closely all else I have written here.

Perhaps those who need to scan the message BEFORE opening to consider them are defended against anything that does not already support their existing model and refuse to listen and find everything they need to justify NOT opening in or extending relationship.

I don't write to be surface skimmed in the main. The nature of stress, strain, trauma, bereavements, separations, pain and loss, is not what I write to reinforce - but all of which are within what I write, because I have lived them, felt them and live a willingness to reintegrate them within wholeness of being despite them or using them as a 'breadcrumb trail'. So of course I wont make much sense to the attempt to escape it all and keep the lid over it or the doors barred.

That a hateful response that found expression and support or silent complicity in this blog community is itself a symptom worthy of curiosity. If you want to know how stress damages the heart then perhaps this is an experiential teaching/learning opportunity.

Jesus (whoever he was) said that it is not what goes IN to the mouth that corrupts, but what goes forth from it. They did not use the term 'mind' them - and ones' witness and word were considered in exactly the sense I have already referred to in 'as you think in your heart'.

What any of us accept and ACT from as true is our witness and the measure of our own receipt.

If we establish hate as our currency of communication, then that sets the measure of our own receipt. By your own will is it done. This may seem scientifically untenable and therefore attackable as religious rubbish, but I dot see it as anything but physics at the level of thought. How can hate receive love? It will not, but instead 'sees' what it expects and preemptively attacks as its own best defence. Love - unified purpose - does not attack illusions, so much as reveal the truth in which they are un-called for or meaningless. But hate learns to masks itself in the forms and appearances of love, respectability, authority, and 'healthcare'. But such a masking CANNOT love. That is to say it refuses and fears communication by engaging in manipulative evasions that pass off as communication. This is a layer of our human experience - that runs beneath appearances and beneath the thoughts that maintain and support such appearances as real.

As a Man Thinketh - rejoinder

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-84738 

It is nothing to do with what is on your lips or as your presentation of a persona, but directly to what you hold in acceptance at heart.Currently - that is in your awareness as your know yourself to be. NO one lives any other way than by the word or conflicted word in their own heart's acceptance - whether this runs consciously or under layers of 'unconsciousness'. You HAVE your reward - but that does not mean you are convicted. It means you have faithful feedback.

IE "What must I be believing or holding true, to be experiencing this effect that I say I do not want?". Clearly we can and do generate unwanted outcomes from old learned habits. Including habits acquired prior to the capacity to consciously evaluate our choice.

It is my experience that when we uncover what we believe, as ideas accepted true, they are automatically changed in status from reality to belief - and are transformed if we are willing align with what becomes obvious AS A RESULT of releasing the idea from its status as 'truth'.

I do NOT mean to 'think about' or intellectualise about one's own or anyone else's known beliefs.

Until a belief is brought conscious, it is presumed reality. Challenging your experience opens your mind, instead of a conditioned reaction.

Most of what are professed as 'beliefs' are part of the presentation of self to others AND to ourself. While we believe we need them, we operate within their rules.

When you recognize what is written upon your own heart, you will not require 'belief' to know gratitude for being. Nor will you need to get anyone else to believe anything they are not already the acceptance of.

I can formulate word and phrase to point to a 'terrain'. I cannot  make you open to that experience. Not do I want anything for you that you are not truly and freely aligned in desire of or willingness for.

That you believe you are in some way threatened or losing something as a result of me invoking 'as a man thinketh so he is' - but adding the heart - because FAKE thinking is all the rage these days - and I also mean that quite literally - because anger is its immediate response to challenge.

I believe I said it in response to defamatory smear of my intent here.

The accuser stands without a case. Or bring it forth and lets see what is actually going on in this diversion from sharing a common purpose: "What causes heart disease?".

Perhaps you want something 'OUT THERE' to cause heart disease that is nice and tidy, and compartmentalised. That is your freedom to pursue. I see a lot 'out there' that I read as symptomatic of error in our thoughts at a fundamental level. But I am not on a witch-hunt. I am pursuing a reintegrative consciousness - instead of dissociating compartmentalised struggle and strain. I may add that I MEET the stress in the raw - but that I feel for a better way of embracing it rather than separating off. As if you could.

The Mentality of a Copy-Paste Reaction

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-84737

"Fake cinnamon toxic!"

was what sparked my comment. 

That premise is - in my opinion - bollocks! - but of course you can overdose on it - as you can with carrots.

The mentality of a copy-paste reaction operates human ignorance.

It can just as well apply to the latest "cure' as the latest "bad for you".

If you actually read Malcolm Kendrick's work, you would understand this.

Inciting personal attacks and division is a kind of trolling,

Anyway, here it is in English:

If you encounter anyone who SAYS that something is toxic or bad, - OR -  If you encounter anyone who SAYS that it is a cure or good, you have the opportunity to awaken consciousness instead of reactively repeating and propagandising disinfo. Doing sot can result in ‘herd auto-immunity’ of attacking and blocking any communication that is associated with the ‘smeared association’. 

This is evident with cholesterol and saturated fats being falsely associated with toxic or injurious outcomes so as to make anyone who challenges such belief, be seen and attacked as a danger to society or an object of derision and ridicule.

Ad hominem and smear tactic always reveal a lack of substance in the would be 'attacker'. But if they find social support, they operate a reversal in projecting the sins of the accuser onto the accused - that the accuser sets up to be attacked, denied or invalidated.

While 'hatred' may be a crappy response to be met with, it is evidently nothing to do with any actual information I have shared here, nor joins with me in willingness to refute or better understand.

When a teacher or leader indicates a target for hate, the fearful are the first to throw the stone. For who, resting in a sense of worth, needs to belittle or ridicule another except that they otherwise feel inadequate or afraid?

So by all means ask me what I mean in any specific instance - IF - you have any interest in understanding.

What if the cause of heart disease leads to YOU - the reader's own doorstep as habits you associate with to such a degree that you do not see them as choices - even less align in a conscious refinement or replacement for a poor choice.

I suggest that you do not have to accept any attack on the integrity of another's being, without challenging and correcting it in your own thought and act. 

I welcome honest criticism. I don't have to be 'right' to express a perspective that I hold in a sense of value, but to myself I have to be honest - or I have no true basis from which to meet anyone. A sick society is such a lack of (self) intimacy. Also known as 'alienation'. Profiting from sickness, defends against loss by ensuring that the cause is always  assigned to various shifting effects. In that sense sickness is a defence against the truth, as a lie of illusion is defended against a feared exposure. Truth has nothing to fear, but every call to be vigilant to the deceits of the attempt to hide fears rather than undo or correct them.

Thomas Cowan's Book

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-84407 

I resonated with Cowan's first interview with Mercola and followed up to Knut Sroka's site and then bought and read Cowan's book. I also followed up on Frank Chester. The book did not find the same target in me as it may in others. I have a sense that some from the Medical hierarchy find it important to 'come out' as a human being. I did not resonate there so much but I appreciate that what he chose to do was in alignment with more than conventional medical approach. I can see something like that in Malcolm's wit and humour - as a larger communication than a merely technical treatise - and yet the technical components stand.

That better ways to attend or help people who suffer disease, may be found in archives or in traditional practice  rather than in modern 'studies' is more than possible. But often it is the framework from which society at the time is working that does not allow, recognize or take notice of genuine help or truly useful information.

I thought Bruce Lipton has the best example of that when we found it was not the DNA that 'controlled' the cell but the environment via the cells peripheral receptors. His exposition was met with stony silence and turned backs. After re-checking his work over again - to make sure that it stood up, he approached a mentor in private and showed him the work and asked him why it was meeting such a reaction. "Well, it's not what we are thinking", was the reply. That's It!

As for what Cowan or anyone has to say, it is really your business as to what you resonate with and why. I can see a host of reasons NOT to get pulled into the long grass of focusing in symptom-fear, and so I would naturally seek out information that reflects a basis for holding an awareness that is calm and connected and therefore vigilant for honesty and against (self) deceits - no matter what is being offered us.

Anna writes of becoming free of angers that have 'unconsciously' run as undercurrent for most of her life. I appreciate her witness. We all have different variations on that theme. When we have already reacted, we are in the framing of that interpretation.... and unlikely to know it.

I associate the Christ with a quality of being in which the reactive impulse no longer runs un-watched or un-owned and so I look forward to the birth of such a quality in humanity as a whole - regardless of the otherwise clash of personal 'identities' that would make truth a weapon and therefore beat to a different drum.

What Rises of Itself When Stress Falls Away

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-83726

Written into the comment thread

What rises of itself when stress falls away (as result of no longer being given focus), is a quality of being, that carries within itself what no external substitution can provide. But which now it is the freedom to live and give out from a true appreciation.

A quality of wholeness that cannot be grasped in possession or controlled under definition, but that we get in our own way.

I sense that the heart is truly responsive to all that is within us  - as a whole. Literally. And not a pump that pushes everything around. But control freaks 'see' themselves in everything - and hence never run out of things to manage. (And I address that term to the chatter-blind mind in us all).

Religion as a word is devalued, just as all words have been devalued by misuse. If we use something to mask or hide in, we are no longer using it as a point of re-cognition or re-membering the living. Love of truth finds seeks to find, and by releasing from what is unfounded, grows appreciation within the true. Science and Religion (Spirituality) are equal paths and Art is the interplay of both in one purpose. Fear of truth seeks everywhere else, indefinitely, and with much ado, seeming to find but only finding more cause to seek in more ways that serve 'seek and do not find'. Like 'War on Cancer'. Or on anything else.

Throwing out the 'baby' of being with the 'bathwater' of religious cultural tradition, is 'death by association' through rejecting forms that trigger conditioned reactions. But at some point, awareness of this device reveals to a new vision, that the 'way home' from a conditioned 'identity' trap, (or unresolved self-conflict), is the willingness to look at what our mind ruled out in haste, without the means to know its own choice - because it worked for what was needed at the time it was needed.

Does it matter what particular 'paths' work for us, or is what matters the qualities we bring into our relationships? The fact that we can pass off as what we are not, or accept what we WANT to be true at expense of looking or listening, is part of being identified in masking of image and form instead of discerning true qualities. What seems like a study under experts may be a ruse by which to degrade the lives of millions with toxic waste - willingly ingested in place of real food.

 - - -

In meeting deeper conflicted stresses in which 'self and its world break down' or are found no longer workable, (strain), I have learned not to dwell or invest in 'my story', but rather to stay open to a wider perspective, for my need is to attend presently and listen within, to release the habits of dependency on what does not and cannot work, and to naturally embrace more consciously aligned choices. In my case I had no attraction to any kind of pharma or other drugs because of not wanting to further mask over or interfere with what is really going on. (truth or self-honesty). So I live with and through what life unfolds as a willingness of discovery and acceptance. I see that fearing negative outcomes works a self-fulfilling prophecy, so I don't live as if to avert or escape them - but for what I can and do appreciate. The 'what' of it is my responsibility - that is - the result of choices I am making, knowingly or as old learned habit.

I too have 'cut the rope' of one I loved so dear. She was and therefore is, a true blessing in my life that became a deeply cutting gift to live on as the 'surviving' of. There is a phrase, 'storing up treasures in Heaven', that may seem trite, but every loving thought and act is witness to true, and the 'heaven' of a truly embracing 'self (and other) acceptance' waits on willingness, not on time, or death or some 'other' moment. This is to say that our thinking can and will block our true appreciation if we are drifting under it rather than discerning its nature.

"I hate myself and want to die" is a corollary of the failure of; "I want it THUS!" - though of course the breaking or sense being denied may express as "NOT THIS!" or "NO!" I see variations of this 'energetic'  through the generations, and running beneath what we take to be our lives.

Waking and healing; I think it takes whatever it takes - no point in 'measuring or comparing' what we want to be free of. Perhaps the gift is in recognising within myself - what I had seen and loved in her, and accepting or letting in these qualities as welcome and true. She was my first born child and brought the light of heaven to my sense of inadequate resource and fear of unworthiness of honouring a sacred trust. Life is challenging, transformative and at times extremely demanding of focus. Life is guiding, supporting and embracing of all that I am - but only through my willingness to let into.

I was raised without religion by parents who wanted to bury and escape anything not modern. A New World of Scientific Progress emerging from the post war austerity. In a sense I came in by the 'back door' of wordless 'territory' of overwhelming experience (Long before Ellie left) - but never into any organised institution. I 'sense' this territory in all for whom 'reality' breaks - but not as a call to 'save' anyone - but rather as a sense of companioning in shared purpose. Waking and healing.

Those whose world has yet to open where they do not expect, must live what seems self-evidently real to them until discover what they do not expect. Some releasing is incremental and ongoing and some can be shocking and sudden. I say 'releasing' because I have no desire to hold onto and build upon pain and loss - but in its timing I did need to honour everything I felt before I was ready and willing to move on. In that sense the cutting away was the healing - and apart from chain smoking and yet breathing, it did not occur to me to not live the feelings. In truth I felt my life depended on honouring them - but not indulging them. As I see it, compassion heals, and sympathy damns - but one doesn't have to meet the demands of others.

Where the hammer blow falls - more will strike. Heart failure could quite evidently occur though wearing down under strain - so I notice that kind of thinking that thinks itself 'my life' - and don't indulge it or feed it. But abide through its moment to focus willingly in what moves and lives me now.

I only offer this as an example of a non medical response to fear, pain, loss, isolation, and any thought/feeling of unworthiness. But it happened I chose or accepted to be so, but not as something to live up to and 'become'. 

--

Posted By Brian Steere to Responses of a willingness to listen within on 12/19/2017 03:32:00 am

Breathe Life and Consciousness

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/02/08/what-causes-heart-disease-part-iv/#comment-51132

Since NO is important look how important Carbon Dioxide is! This is really not a reach, people who have heart disease over-breathe way above the norm. They have less circulating Co2 and thus less NO as a result of over-breathing. Stress? Maybe! Over-breathe on any level and you drive the Co2 out of your system and as a result you drive NO down. Think about it!!! No Co2 no NO.

I would be inclined to expect unfelt and unconscious shallow breathing to be part of weaker function. With mouth breathing as a sign of lack of energy. What is 'over breathing'?  (Ok I looked it up).

I've recently adopted the 'nitric oxide dump' 4min exercise from Zach Bush (Mercola brought him on stage at some forum recently and I followed him up). Nose breathing is part of its working and chimes with other things I recently met on not mouth breathing.

When the shoe fits - wear it - but chasing 'health' in terms of externals is a reinforcer of a sense of lack.  Breathing is a core fundamental activity that as with so much else can set up a positive or negative reinforcement loop. Is it not all about where we are coming from? A sense of connection lived or a sense of lack in seeking elsewhere.

I don't know a lot about NO  - and if as I do - it will open a lot more that I don't know or perhaps frame me in presuming to know.

But Zach Bush indicates the first 4 mins or so of a persistent exercise release the NO - after which it takes a couple of hours to replenish (?) - and so don't repeat the exercise again too soon. So this is just me repeating what I heard. Stress-triggering NO opens the flow to more regeneration, repair and robustness to the musculature and vasculature. Sounds plausible. Its all about finding your balance in life or perhaps losing it in habit-forms of sleepwalking through it.

If we were regarded as a living battery we would need charge/discharge cycles to maintain and embody polarity charge. Which is that flowing yin-yang embrace of each within the other and both/all within the whole. In our society, a polarized communication breakdown operates both poles against the centre instead of a centred balance point embracing both (all) polarities. A false centrism denies polarity in risk aversion. Loss of balance in alignment generates an action reaction reinforcement that depletes and exhausts the natural desire to support and embrace it. Everything falls apart without a true rythmic balancing of the centre with its field, and the field with its centre. Control is not top down - except as organised disorder trying to pass off as control. Alignment in unified purpose is a true control. In simple terms this is in the felt qualities of our being that seem cliches to their lip service or masking facade - but joy in what we be and do is not complicated though such purpose lived will inevitable meet all the 'complications' we individually and collectively set up to evade, delay or deny presence in reacting to something passing off as true.

Short-cuts, Long-roads and Vortices

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/02/13/what-causes-heart-disease-part-v/#comment-51563 

Oh - but you are not sorry - but rather take a perverse delight in pronouncing death's triumph over life right from its birth! - and lay your trophy down to the god of an 'evolution' that cares nothing beyond living long enough to spawn another heartbreaking subjection to death under inexorable pressure. Yes I know, its in vogue. Amazing how incredibly creative thinking becomes when its has permission to survive only if it fits into the narrative. (I'm not against evolutionary development - but I don't use it as a substitute for the creative - so much as a development within creative parameters. Why create strain of constant conflict, limitation and loss? Perhaps one cannot answer half a cycle - you have to embrace it's fulfilment to know the whole of it - and I don't means stress release so much as an embracing wholeness to what seemed a polarised struggle in isolation under duress (survival mode).

While modern humans seek to manipulate environments to the extent of becoming denatured and dissociated from the life that flows in our veins and sings in every cell, everything else that lives embodies an expression of its environment. This because we also 'live in' and embody a psychic environment and yet have 'broken' our covenant with That which gives life. The mess around psychic emotional conflict is mapped out and distanced excepting within certain rules and conditions. But just because we operate mind-blinders, the mess persists as an inexorable pressure upon the capacity to override it or eradicate its symptoms. We both recognize a symptom of strain, depletion and dysfunction, but your assigned cause leaves you without any responsibility ... or choice - where my acknowledging and owning of 'underlying psychic-emotional conditioned habits'  awakens and enlivens me to curiosity and willingness to bring them into the arena of consciousness and choice. I don't say this to belittle your current choice - but to illuminate that it is in a sense, an evolutionary dead end. 

The short-cut makes the long road - so when people start thinking 'inflammation' is the cause it is only a symbol for a deficiency or toxicity condition in which the normal expression or complete cycle of expression is blocked, resulting in 'complications' or workarounds - that can itself meet blocked function (if the deficiency/toxicity persists) resulting in an ever more taxing overhead for an ever decreasing fulfilment of function. Sounds familiar?

Now death and taxes are deemed the only certainties of life - but is that life as observed but beyond explanation? or life as theorised but unable to be observed? (BTW I knocked that last dichotomy from a further information regarding plasma vortices as the core nature of blood flow.

http://www.rsarchive.org/RelArtic/Marinelli/

This ought to be of deep significance to your curiosity and others here IF as it illuminates and demonstrates, a most fundamental error underlies our theory of something so incredibly amazing that we have cannot explain it (away).

New light on heart health?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/01/25/what-causes-heart-disease-part-iii/

Vincent Nonnenmacher
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/01/25/what-causes-heart-disease-part-iii/#comment-51031
Interesting to see how these ‘specialists’ are prompt to dismiss such long term established empirical ‘wisdom sayings’ as non sense when modern science coul try to explain that our own biochemical pathways could use garlic as a backup source of sulfur for deficiency of Cholesterol-sulfate.
There is a very interesting article here : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456713/#!po=81.1475Where a lot of clues that our host is seeding along its 3 part wonderful threads are assembled in an intriguing explanation.
It is exactly as a thriller, where all names are cited, even atherom formation, elevated blood pressure and trombosis are exposed not as the culprit but explanation of ways for the body to regulate flow (there is also some explanations on why such difference between arteries and veins due to electromagnetic fields differences due to water conduction and exclusion zone differences between the size and flow conditions).
Fascinating to say the least!

Richly resonating to say the most!

Does not this study most directly address the 'process' or development of incompletely identified prime suspects (atherosclerosis) regarding heart disease? While reasonably challenging more than a few sacred cows - but under a congruent hypothesis of significant accounting for observed experience?

I am already aware of Seneff's and Pollack's work - (and of the establishment antipathy to 'plasma' underpinnings as the Way Things Work - (for it would mark the end of a 'dark matter-ialism) - for its principles are scalable from the Galactic to the intracellular).

 " It's Life Jim - but not as we thought we knew it!"

I appreciate Seneff (and anyone's) willingness to explore the premise of Body as of a wholeness, operating by design to maintain core function under conditions of defficiency or toxicity. This contrasts with our (unconscious) framing in the conditioned narrative presumptions of a flawed, failed or fallen nature, (guilt assigned to weak or failed body/mind), attack, (consequence of guilt), breakdown,in pain and loss, (penalty), and the call to intervene without checking the truth of our perception/belief/experience/reaction.

Interventions may embody 'limited sacrifice' seeking to pre-empt or mitigate greater penalty, heroic rescue, by appeal to magical reassigning of causes and treatments to diversionary focus and procedures - but they can also align with serving the reintegration to health and wholeness in its own terms - rather than in terms of all the king's horses and all the king's men. Many may assign the idea that life has its own innate guidance, support and recovery system as delusional, but that is the result of the idea we can override life to comply and conform to our model of definition, prediction and control ...or fearful defence management. Who is in fact delusional?

As someone who has developed an intuitive discernment in terms of consciousness - I see the same core pattern of belief-protection operating out-from a sense of lack of wholeness defending its image, model or identity against wholeness or health. This predicate running pervasive to our consciousness/worldview and invested self-interest. "Everything is backwards" as the Ellsner quote expands. Perhaps IF we corroborate Seneff's findings as valid - it may help question the way we frame questions.

The history of the suppression, erasure, demonisation via smear, and domination or manipulation of 'consensual' narrative account and belief, can be used a guide to opportunities NOT taken that remain available. But no one can open to consider a view that challenges, undermines or renders obsolete the currently invested identity - and there's the rub. Invested identifications operate as accepted/believed true in place of relational integrity - and wholeness or congruence is relational integrity - that is also 'scalable' as resonant communication.

A false or mis identification, generates negative synergistic reinforcement. Similar in a sense to the adage that a lie calls upon another to keep it hidden until the tares overwhelm the crop... or the harvest gathered in.

And yet the development of a complex subjective (mythic) consciousness upon such identity-reaction maintains psychic-emotional survival within the physical - but at odds with or dissociated from a true appreciation of existence and in a sense, blindly at war with its own good.

The upshot being that we generally get it upside down and back to front as a result of an original error that 'problem solving' obliterates from the possibility of revision. So perhaps it is not an error until we do not want the result it brings. As the song goes - 'some dance to remember, and some dance to forget'. (Hotel California)

Statin the Deceiver

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/05/22/cholesterol-lowering-the-end-of-the-beginning/#comment-70507 

I appreciate that you are engaging in scrutiny within the frameworks that deceit establishes as a means to filter and distort communication to protect a lie against the truth. For its blatancy of deceit is only 'supported' by apparent credential. Since when does choosing NOT not take pharmaceutical drugs become defined as thousands of needless deaths - as if death is the result of an absence of statins - and not a synergy of negative influences upon health that INCLUDES phamaceutical intervention - and I feel confident to say this vector of sickness and death is statistically very large despite the ways deaths are recorded. IE: How many deaths are recorded as being the result of chemotherapy?

But it remains the power of the establishment to publish and promote 'self-serving' lies in guises of truth, while blocking, ignoring or 'wakefielding' inconvenient truths - and it does so as a survival urge - with the forces and funding they can muster - for if truth were out - there would at the least be criminal proceedings of knowing culpability writ large.

Placebo and nocebo effects are worthy of opening to - because the power of belief is used by 'PR' and mis-informed 'carriers' of 'viral' misinformation as the very basis of their business and power model - for this cannot be assigned merely to 'greedy business interests' when it operates a 'power class' operating a captured regulatory (and most else) system. The public are trained to accord authority  - (submit) - to presumed specialists of a particular regulated focus of official state regulated 'medicine' along with the magical belief in progress of cutting edge science as the carrot that will cure the stick that grows ever more complex in its ability to demand management instead.

Is it wiser to re-establish true witness from the ground up and be open to legitimate criticism - than to be baited and dragged into labyrinths of obfuscation and deliberate tactic of undermining any conscious capacity to actually address what is really going on? 

IF the studied people more negative effects from a placebo cast as a believed toxin - (regardless any promoted side effects regarding the health of the human heart), and the 'interpretation' ascribes the belief to 'fake news' and quackery - without ever applying the same set of values to their own agenda - then they are not aware of their own negative effect on health as a direct result of negative prognosis - including public and loud assertions that "lack of statins will shorten your life". However, a besieged and insane 'authority' will justify any sacrifice against its fears of a worse outcome if such 'authority' should be undermined. And so instead of establishing truth from the ground up and being open to criticism, they align in support of the lie to which the living must be sacrificed - and even 'educated' to volunteer or defend such a system against anything but submissive compliance.

I don't have to be a scientist to discern manipulative linguistic framing and refuse the bait. But I do have to love truth because it is true rather than protect invested identity because I want something to be true or not true.