The Mentality of a Copy-Paste Reaction

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2017/12/09/what-causes-heart-disease-part-xlii-forty-two/#comment-84737

"Fake cinnamon toxic!"

was what sparked my comment. 

That premise is - in my opinion - bollocks! - but of course you can overdose on it - as you can with carrots.

The mentality of a copy-paste reaction operates human ignorance.

It can just as well apply to the latest "cure' as the latest "bad for you".

If you actually read Malcolm Kendrick's work, you would understand this.

Inciting personal attacks and division is a kind of trolling,

Anyway, here it is in English:

If you encounter anyone who SAYS that something is toxic or bad, - OR -  If you encounter anyone who SAYS that it is a cure or good, you have the opportunity to awaken consciousness instead of reactively repeating and propagandising disinfo. Doing sot can result in ‘herd auto-immunity’ of attacking and blocking any communication that is associated with the ‘smeared association’. 

This is evident with cholesterol and saturated fats being falsely associated with toxic or injurious outcomes so as to make anyone who challenges such belief, be seen and attacked as a danger to society or an object of derision and ridicule.

Ad hominem and smear tactic always reveal a lack of substance in the would be 'attacker'. But if they find social support, they operate a reversal in projecting the sins of the accuser onto the accused - that the accuser sets up to be attacked, denied or invalidated.

While 'hatred' may be a crappy response to be met with, it is evidently nothing to do with any actual information I have shared here, nor joins with me in willingness to refute or better understand.

When a teacher or leader indicates a target for hate, the fearful are the first to throw the stone. For who, resting in a sense of worth, needs to belittle or ridicule another except that they otherwise feel inadequate or afraid?

So by all means ask me what I mean in any specific instance - IF - you have any interest in understanding.

What if the cause of heart disease leads to YOU - the reader's own doorstep as habits you associate with to such a degree that you do not see them as choices - even less align in a conscious refinement or replacement for a poor choice.

I suggest that you do not have to accept any attack on the integrity of another's being, without challenging and correcting it in your own thought and act. 

I welcome honest criticism. I don't have to be 'right' to express a perspective that I hold in a sense of value, but to myself I have to be honest - or I have no true basis from which to meet anyone. A sick society is such a lack of (self) intimacy. Also known as 'alienation'. Profiting from sickness, defends against loss by ensuring that the cause is always  assigned to various shifting effects. In that sense sickness is a defence against the truth, as a lie of illusion is defended against a feared exposure. Truth has nothing to fear, but every call to be vigilant to the deceits of the attempt to hide fears rather than undo or correct them.