The Mind Is A 'Wonderful Thing' Wot!

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/01/02/what-causes-heart-disease-part-60-prediction/

The mind is a 'wonderful thing' wot!

As long as you are aging or persisting in time - you are alive as this unique you.

So ageing is not death and doesn't cause it - but you can see it that way if you want.

Likewise your risk of death in this very moment is zero - because you are 100% alive even if your  systemic noise to signal ration makes a case for a partial state of aliveness. The quality and current state of your experience may be anything in any set of ranges - but by God - you are the witness to Life is - and not the dead witnessing to Life was - but death deleted it.

This is not very 'spiritually correct' in a dead world under dead management - but lets say that the mind's defined identity in this life is not the Life itself - but an expression of such a focus in the frame of time and space, then you can recognize you are supported in the acceptance and exploration of your thought (self-definition) so as to be able to live under constant threat of death and have the benefits thereof - or some other way of embodying Life.

Thus at the level of mind-substitution for a real life, is the ability to in a sense be already dead - as a sort of pre-emptive ultimate vaccination. My Dad was a bit like that - "Better to never have loved than to have loved and lost" could have been his motto. But that is simply the expression of defence of an unhealed heart and not the truth of the love that he simply was and is - in my life - though he gave up the ghost of the struggle to maintain his defences against overwhelming odds.

I don't know 'where I go' when I 'fall' to sleep and have no way of knowing how to wake or for sure whether I will. Indeed the next moment could be a surprise!

Takenforgrantedness is surely dead to the living world.

The mind can be a very useful tool but  like the internet - a poor choice of persistent fixated focus. The idea of death can be used to bring ourselves truly present - or to absent ourself under a sense of dissociated thinking that doesn't add even a cubit to who we are - (what's a cubit? ;-)

Obviously there is a love of problem solving within the human predicament - so much so that our answers seem to grow more heads to the problem - but as if new problems.

What if opening all facets of an issue to communication allowed a process of reintegration, resolution and reconciliation? Some of which some of us find during our preparations to let go of whatever life is - or seemed so definitely to be at the time.

When I lost a beloved to sudden death - the nature of it pulled the rug  - nay the foundations from beneath me such as to not have any personal sense of an ability to live on - but life from a deeper place recognized the 'invitation' or opportunity to exit and did not choose it - one moment at a time over a long time. There are 'mysteries' that are felt and known that cannot be articulated or anatomised that are in a sense the underlying reality to this balancing act we call the world.

Without denigrating our physical embodiment - we are not obliged to confine to its definitions - that in fact we give it as our 'model' of self in relation to another (relational being). The range of nutrients includes whatever is your meat - or bread - but you live by a whole convergence or focus of activities and events - as do we all - and by far the most of which are out of range to our little minded thought.

That Sun activity has effect on the heart is already intimating a greater environment that keeps time to an invisible music.

Who knows whether this one gets past Malcolm. But when I write to one I write to all.

Incoming messages can be blocked because they don't fit the narrative defence requirements.

Anyone aligning in their own integrity of being will encounter exclusion in a world of lies. It may not seem so at the time because we are trained to see what is wrong with everyone else. Reintegrating to a deeper or more embracing (and timeless) awareness is not in order to get a longer or better life for oneself - but to open a better perspective in terms of self-integrity that naturally extends to others - because it is beneath all the crap I took to be myself and struggled with(in).

So many are trained to seek union in a negative that they are completely unaware of what they are doing. Friends who only agree are feigning - so as to bubble or wall out what the relationship is being used to hide. No blame in that as a conscious choice to share something worthy together. But when cliqued into habitual identities that run in place of relationship, it is running exactly like the institutions we like to judge against. the establishment is those who have enough of what they want from the way it currently is - and those who have so little they are afraid of losing the little they have in any real change.

is it possible to die while still alive - in terms of renewal and refreshment? Or is the old dog condemned to the same old tricks? The principle is simply a curiosity - lived. Not a dramatic rebranding. Perhaps we can choose to die consciously or to hide? But this would likely be the result of living this way and not suddenly releasing ingrained habits of thought just because the body falls off. The best prediction is always a now-update in terms of all the energetic variables present as probable futures. The act of predicting - itself - changes the balance. But its only a reading of what is currently in motion in current framing.

But That May Be In Fact Our 'Second Nature'

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/01/02/what-causes-heart-disease-part-60-prediction/?replytocom=114337#respond 

To your very last point: I note that we can see the world in terms of evil intent or as an expression of fear-induced ignorance or self-deception. This is a chicken and egg situation, because each reinforces the other. We can also see the world as an opportunity of education - as the undoing of ignorance in a truly well intent.

While an ill-intent runs as if self-protective, ignorance is asserted or imposed as necessary, good, or at least the lesser evil and all running as if our nature or the natural order.

Ill intent is not our natural intent - but is systematically built into our social identity in terms of defence against feared or denied aspects of our being. Denied self is necessarily an ignorance, of self-evasion. Running away from our self - in terms of un-owned or unfaced conflicts is presented as the mask of discovery and achievement or ability to keep face.

I don't accept the nature of fear as the true of us - but I do accept that we have let fear replace reason and in that sense lost our mind. Recognition of which is the regaining of sanity in some degree. My sense of lies is that they multiply and render unworkable or dysfunctional and the crisis of such is the opportunity to 'awaken' rather than dig deeper into defending a false premise. This is the ability or willingness to question what used to be regarded as reality - and is necessarily confronting fears rather than hiding them - but only with regard to the ills of the day thereof. No need to go looking for a cause of loss of joy and peace in our day. But that may be in fact our 'second nature'.

The Idea 'Anyone Can Edit' Is An Unworkable Ideal

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/

The idea 'anyone can edit' is an ideal that is unworkable - or rather can be worked by deceitful intent against a true sharing or witnessing of account or information.

But trusted sources - while they may still be open to biases and errors - are worthy of sharing - not censor or smear.

So the idea of giving a witness to the 'disappeared' or falsely smeared is a worthy one.

Of course association with such 'heretics' is dangerous to the reputation and career and so such a resource has to be either very broadly supported or run by people who are willing to operate in such territory.

Then who exactly draws the line as to whether indeed an excommunicated 'heretic' has merit - regardless any errors or bias of their particular approach?

While the Net is still open I find a lot of the denied findings or information to be linked.

While I believe there are deceits to be warned against or publicised as a caution I also feel that information needs to be open for others to make up their own mind or see WHY there is a warning. 

Rockefeller's Nujol (Crude Oil) as a cancer cure should qualify in my opinion as intentional deceit that presaged an international (ongoing) deceit. But there is an argument that people will believe anything rather than face the truth and so providing them with what they want, for what they are willing to give you, is a contract of exchange. But of course if the fear is sown and nurtured, and a false salvation offered, by the time they find out - if they find out - the deceived are powerless or dead.

I have found a lot of 'denied' or erased history at whale.to

This is one person's record of his own research as (mostly) a site of referenced information - not narrative control. Malcolm has a mention:

ie: http://www.whale.to/a/cholesterol.html

I don't think this site pretends to operate 'quality control' so much as expose and counter the narrative control operated by power, knowingly or in error.

Of course finding out about predatory or parasitic deceits may itself induce a heart attack - so be vigilant to hold a desire for health when negative emotion and intent is flushed out of hiding.

Fear distorts our perception and blocks our innate knowing. Therefore a frightened or divided mind is vulnerable to its own errors and the manipulations of others.

The role of fear in sickness goes far deeper than the tip of the iceberg that shows above the surface reality. But sickness - including the breakdown of communication in wikipedia - can generate a health response that uses the fears that come up to deepen and integrate self honesty. Health is also integrity - and integrity is not regained by attacking, opposing, or denying sickness (in any of its expressions).

The 'Vegan Beast' Would Have No More Voice

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/18/wikipedia-a-parable-for-our-times/#comment-113013 

Ob-literate  - ok I thought it a bit extreme but it is literally accurate!

The 'vegan beast' would have no more voice than any other voice if not being used as a proxy for vested interests of dominating influence. A very few, given powerful backing and protection can cause a lot of trouble from which many shy away to seek to avoid. The 'beast' remains hidden in the 'Deep' shadow. I feel to illuminate the beast and bring it out in the open, rather than assign power to proxy 'vegans' who may or may not be all that they flag themselves to seem.

The vector that is chosen to operate as the opposition to the rival or threat to the invested establishment narrative, has to have some popular appeal to recapture a similar  arena of interests - which also invoked polarised division to weaken and fragment or divide the 'enemy'.

Diet in terms of 'health' for the survival of a sense of moral entitlement' that presupposes or targets an already existing sense of guilt - which the Corporate - and its Media - outsource to its 'consumers' for its own toxic malpractice. Thus are we 'made in the image of such a god' for the purpose of buying into, eating and being injected/subjected to the consequences of their actions - along with a sense of virtue for supporting the War on Whatever.

When the media profile, coverage and support is also aligned with funding and career opportunity, it becomes economically and socially unviable to speak or act in line with what is just, worthy or true, but only while a critical mass support the basis of such imposed 'correctness' or narrative CONTROL. 

We are close to a tipping point of either collapse into cynicism and a false self-serving protectionism, or coming out in open declaration as the right to a voice, a conversation and a relationship. The systems of living organisation can be seen as if tyrannous by thinking that sets out as the intent to define and control, but in fact there is a cooperative alignment in life that we haven't a political model for, because we so rarely release the 'define and control' long enough to let such a consciousness abide in us and grow in us. The old investment in private power is the 'Herod' or the Caesar of  enacting or demanding sacrifice. The birthing of a fresh perspective is not fuel for private loveless agenda to deny and subvert - but to reconnect consciousness to the Matrix of Life - instead of a matrix of lies. To embody life is to break the 'rules' that the lie keeps hidden - but enforced.

Lies are employed because truth is feared or indeed hated.

In this sense they seem protective to the life of those who believe they need them.

And so are defended to the death if need be, because they have become identified with protection and survival, while true witness has become associated with violation and threat.

In such minds are we often reacting insanely  because of not looking and listening deeper than our reactions dictate - and there are those who know this and use it to manipulate us through our own 'identity profile'. 

Only true witness given and received identifies us truly. Everything is is short changing a deeper appreciation.

Why believe ANYthing 'Vegan Person' has been used to say

Why believe ANYthing 'Vegan person' has been used to say. Or engage with it in any way? It asks nothing and shares nothing that isn't a crafted intent to provoke reaction. And so there is nothing here to engage with but a deceitful and malicious intent.

This baiting speaks exactly the language that everyone is trained to rise to the bait and react to AS IF they understand it. This seemingly yobbish behaviour masks the clever manipulator and everyone else the playthings. A deceitful intent can have any name and any number of names, to provoke and promote the conditions in which a genuine sharing of views either cant happen or becomes drowned out by noise.

HCLF + ultra processed phood (vegan or otherwise) operates an intentional war against human beings, who are held no more important than animals unless they have a particular use - like veganism as a guilt-trip of fake concern as a cover for a hate campaign - and of course a sickness 'care' system. Yes there are some who love nature and feel for animals and choose to withdraw support from treating them worse than animals. But for the self-superior, the projection of their own 'victim' into anyone else's life is THEIRS and theirs alone. That is where putting hatred into something that is part of you, hides itself in the attempt to hate that part of yourself in others and attack it there. It is no love for anyone, including yourself. Especially yourself.

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/#comment-112941

Published:::

If Malcolm feels any post is inflammatory and unhelpful, then I trust he will not let it publish in ‘his house’. That isn’t censorship, but wisdom. Health requires not accepting toxic garbage as if it is food, or one merely throws life away to a loveless agenda.

It isn’t LCHF that is in the target of fraudsters, but ANYTHING true that threatens the bubble of a mind-capture. But in openly going after LCHF educational awakening is openly declaring war on dietary advice backed by not only sound science but reversals of diabetes – which is a vector through which a whole not more shit hits the fan. And then it shows up – that it never was about loving animals but hating humanity – as if to escape one’s own.

Using animals or vegans as a political manipulation is not merely ‘unethical’, its deceitful. But without any integrity Everything becomes deceitful and leaves only the ‘science’ of what works to block, or subvert and distort communication to a private agenda.

Wikipedia is erasing itself. The whole ‘power game’ of deceit is erasing itself and taking everyone with it – who is willing to align in hate. Masked or presented in all the tricks and deceits that have worked over and again through the generations.

Rather Than Mask In Vague Self Depreciating Ambiguities

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/#comment-112664 

I make definite statements rather than mask in vague self depreciating ambiguities. These of course can be ignored or engaged with and are not more or less that idea.

The belief that it is impossible to know anything becomes an inability to understand anything except support for vague self-depreciating ambiguities. This is exactly the cynical gullibility that gives power to 'experts' or ideologies. Cynical because self-depreciating and gullible because it simply wants to give over responsibility to someone or something else.

If you were - in fact - curious you could either follow up or reframe your statement.

Cellular health is fundamental to every  cellular function. If the intra cellular and extra or indeed inter-cellular communication is blocked, degraded, or breaks down the functions are lost within the muscle, the blood cell, the brain cell etc

I don't mean to invoke blame for self depreciation but to note that a lack of health and a lack of self appreciation are related. There is no real substitution for life lived - regardless what protocols or procedures are adopted - and after all such is the point of being healthy or supported in functional endeavour. Self-depreciation also operates psychologically as a basis from which to extend a lack of worth to others or invite them to join in a mutually self-reinforcing sense of lack.

If indeed you believe yourself unable to understand - this may be the central issue to look at before proceeding. Children learn by immersion and induction - as a relational willingness and persistent intent. Hence I invited you to be with or abide in what your mind cannot currently grasp or 'define and control' in its own terms, because understandings can then dawn on you in a relational way rather than being learned by rote as part of acquiring a structure of ideas ABOUT something that stuff information without necessarily making any real connection.

My sense is that we get in our own way by the nature of our focus - wanting to grasp and possess and control and be displayed in having become successful is not the basis for a relationship - and so will never induce more than a transient honeymoon effect - such as Ancel Keys on the cover or Time magazine. He was only 'famous' for the purpose of an agenda that cared nothing for him or for science, but only to establish a narrative belief from which to gain in power over captive revenue streams - otherwise known as people.

It might be worth identifying what the current or active scientific, medical and health paradigms are and have been - because they frame our thinking without being questioned - because they have the status of fact when they generally operate a narrative cover story over where we do not want to look. So in some sense they WORK as a cover story but at a cost. Thus the consequence of such a cost can itself be masked in another cover story - such as so called side effects being diagnosed as a disease, or of toxicity being defined as an infection.

Reading the recent coverage on Johnson's baby talc and cancer was  - I thought - a probably typical example of how no evil intent, but an established business, persisted in selling product despite possible serious adverse health consequence and yet internally sought to minimise the risks, but also minimising the risk to their business survival. Once they knew enough to know too much, they crossed a line of hiding the risks and knowingly concealing a danger to health and life in baby products. From there on the liabilities multiplied to moral culpability of intent.

It isn't the mistake that condemns us, but the hiding or concealment of it. Plausible deniability is a sort of legally defensible ability of being able to claim not to know. If - as eventually occurs, internal documents are forced to the view of a court action, it is then shown to have been a mask of deceit all along.

No one want to lose what they have - while what they cling to possessing is defined in GETTING from (unfelt) relationships. I feel the LOSS of relational communication is the key factor (on all levels) and that blame and hate in seemingly moral hatred enact the destruction of relational communication AS IF an ANSWER. As if health is the ability to persist in destructive non-relational 'getting' without consequence - or without true accounting for consequence.

I enjoy what I write so you don't have to. But perhaps cynicism cannot by definition accept or recognize - make sense of joy. Cynicism does not regard itself hateful but 'right' and delight in finding the 'wrongs' OUT THERE' or at least - somewhere else. Hence the endless search for causes that exonerate us of any implicit responsibility - because responsibility is not associated with awakening freedom to respond differently, but with blame, shame and penalty in pain and loss. Guilt EXPECTS punishment and effects defences that then bring it on as a self reinforcing or circular proof. You are not an idiot AH unless of course you insist. In which you embody the attributes and attract the results to your decision. I walk with you in freedom - which embraces 'not knowing' as a condition of curious receptivity - not of self-judgement that then 'shares on in like kind'.

Wikipedic An Attack On True Relational Communication

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/

Insofar as there is the power to frame, direct or control the narrative of a common currency of exchange, I feel it matters as an attack on true relational communication.

Assets such as wikipedia files are used to support an official reality - which it the one that can redraw the law to out you are as a cholesterol denier with actual penalties in terms of social exclusion. 

I agree with you that it is a waste of time to engage in wikipedia as if it was an independent endeavour running on principles of openness and transparency.

Mainstream news has a share of captive intelligentsia - who are too invested in a society that supports their own achievements to question more deeply and upset their own apple cart. An example I often meet is in seeing corruptions as localised bad apples rather than systemic and in other arenas than their own.

Corrupted power has always used deceit to maintain its claim to allegiance - along with force and terror of course. 

My sense is that exposure does lead to a withdrawal of allegiance and a more critical awareness.

If we value truth as our own self-honest capacity to 'navigate' or find our balance points in life - then we learn painfully that simply following anyone is a form of sleepwalking at best.

Regardless all the apparatus brought to bear in arriving at a decision, I am of the opinion that the intuitive is a more direct route - but that the intuitive/intellectual are two poles that best blend and work together in unified purpose - as the parts of our body. One without the other can be very wrong - because you can smell a rat, know it to be false and opt for a completely erroneous narrative in reaction. Intellect without intuition can seriously argue its own non existence by framing itself or any facet of itself - out of the picture.

Living knowingly under a soft tyranny (with hard results) is different than in the bubble of its narrative identity management system. The former is to be the reminder to vigilance and wakefulness and the latter a sort of anaesthetised symptom suppression.

Being able to see or recognize the difference is a real choice.

I just trialled wikipedia and chose 'freedom' - had to get past a begging letter - as if it would be allowed to fail. Sooner one of the banks! But playing the poor man gives its contributing supporters a 'moral' investment of identity that cannot but extend as a trusted relationship or source.

Anyway it is only 'free' to think the thoughts that its brain is deterministically thinking. It would be comical - but also tragic in consequence.

//

Free will:

In philosophical discourse, freedom is discussed in the context of free will and self-determination, balanced by moral responsibility.

Advocates of free will regard freedom of thought as innate to the human mind, while opponents regard the mind as thinking only the thoughts that a purely deterministic brain happens to be engaged in at the time.

//