The Idea 'Anyone Can Edit' Is An Unworkable Ideal

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/

The idea 'anyone can edit' is an ideal that is unworkable - or rather can be worked by deceitful intent against a true sharing or witnessing of account or information.

But trusted sources - while they may still be open to biases and errors - are worthy of sharing - not censor or smear.

So the idea of giving a witness to the 'disappeared' or falsely smeared is a worthy one.

Of course association with such 'heretics' is dangerous to the reputation and career and so such a resource has to be either very broadly supported or run by people who are willing to operate in such territory.

Then who exactly draws the line as to whether indeed an excommunicated 'heretic' has merit - regardless any errors or bias of their particular approach?

While the Net is still open I find a lot of the denied findings or information to be linked.

While I believe there are deceits to be warned against or publicised as a caution I also feel that information needs to be open for others to make up their own mind or see WHY there is a warning. 

Rockefeller's Nujol (Crude Oil) as a cancer cure should qualify in my opinion as intentional deceit that presaged an international (ongoing) deceit. But there is an argument that people will believe anything rather than face the truth and so providing them with what they want, for what they are willing to give you, is a contract of exchange. But of course if the fear is sown and nurtured, and a false salvation offered, by the time they find out - if they find out - the deceived are powerless or dead.

I have found a lot of 'denied' or erased history at whale.to

This is one person's record of his own research as (mostly) a site of referenced information - not narrative control. Malcolm has a mention:

ie: http://www.whale.to/a/cholesterol.html

I don't think this site pretends to operate 'quality control' so much as expose and counter the narrative control operated by power, knowingly or in error.

Of course finding out about predatory or parasitic deceits may itself induce a heart attack - so be vigilant to hold a desire for health when negative emotion and intent is flushed out of hiding.

Fear distorts our perception and blocks our innate knowing. Therefore a frightened or divided mind is vulnerable to its own errors and the manipulations of others.

The role of fear in sickness goes far deeper than the tip of the iceberg that shows above the surface reality. But sickness - including the breakdown of communication in wikipedia - can generate a health response that uses the fears that come up to deepen and integrate self honesty. Health is also integrity - and integrity is not regained by attacking, opposing, or denying sickness (in any of its expressions).