WHO gets to define the goalposts?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/#comment-112532 

WHO gets to define the goalposts? I challenge you to read the historical documentation gathered in Suzanne Humpries "Dissolving illusions" - if you care. 

I know a woman who had  - against her father's warning, (He worked in research) used a pre public access sample of DDT on her settee to rid it of fleas. She went into Intensive care for  some months and has never been free of various neurological and walking difficulties since (probably 50+ years). No one had a clue as to what had happenned to her. Years later she confided the fact to her GP who showed interest but then she did not want to burden him with such trivial matters as one woman's history when he had so many in need who required his attention. (Irony of a presumed lack of importance).

The cover story for corporate industrial poisoning is infectious disease - and the 'industry' of their 'treatment'. Toxicity initiates the breakdowns of function that the body then mobilises to attempt to clear. Where the toxicity is too great or the depleted and malnourished state of immune function too low - the sickness is blamed for the harm - but in this sense 'sickness' is part OF immune response.

Narratives fed by PR from a top down power to persist their assertion no matter what - operate a corporately owned realm in which the predators farm their assets.

When vaccine, pharma or pesticides and chemical or biological weapons are outlawed in the developed countries, they are then sold on to those who have never been allowed to develop - such as the 'third world' because they have a lot less of a voice than we do, and much more likelihood to be 'disappeared' or simply tortured and killed than in 'civilised' countries. Note that Zika is nothing new and nothing to be alarmed about and nothing like its PR cover story, but opened the way for GM mosquitos and vaccine development. Much that there is to be alarmed about is routinely IGNORED.

I suggest that the 'wild' polio is innate to human biology and is usually of no great consequence. The methods of treatment that nurse through illness while supporting the retention of function as well as the health of the sufferer are known (were known) but ignored. PR runs the show because there is no love of truth - and an association of penalty with truth-telling.

Dr Klenner reported his unqualified success with intravenous vit C for not only treating but reversing polio to a meeting of the AMA and was totally IGNORED. The whole agenda was already in motion. PR. If it is a sickening possibility to consider fraud from the very top, then is it not actually more sickening NOT TO BE AWARE of being so manipulated?

Lets have a proper scientific focus on vaccination - and bring it out of the 'answers' that cant be questioned. Start with a controlled trial of vax and non vax - with apples and apples - in other words don't pre frame to study to determine the result. How can 'studies' be guaranteed to be independently set up and carried out? I don't know that they can when Trillion dollar forces are involved.

Do your want a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs? (To the Afghan leadership from the US)

Un-transparent and accountable vaccine administration is biological experimentation on human beings and a vector of weaponry of the State (or corp-captured state) upon its own or other peoples.

I read that R Kennedy Jr and ICAN effected a FOI for documentation of the legally required checks as to safety and efficacy for the last 38 years. There are none.

At the very least don't presume that because you are TOLD they are perfectly safe that they are risk free and at least open a curiosity to check that what we all grew up believing has foundation in fact and not in 'consensus or settle science' that can be 'denied' but can never be criticised or challenged. This is 'vaccinating' our minds against the possibility of an education so that any questioning of vaccination brings up the 'deny the denialist' antibody liek a steel shutter.

As William gates says - you don't want to listen to 'baby killers' do you?. The very usage of such terms is a giveaway to the agenda. If the benefits were obvious - you would not need to use such base tactic to terrorise people into compliance. Perhaps statins could be switched into a biological intervention - so that you cant 'forget to take them'. Your medical and vax record is a vital part of the Internet of Things.