'The real pandemic' (?)

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/21/the-anti-lockdown-strategy/#comment-161458

AhNotepad said:

“The real pandemic here appears to be dysregulated glucose metabolism; in other words, insulin resistance, which is exceedingly prevalent in the U.S. Insulin resistance, is a diet-induced condition.”

There are other factors at play of course https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/05/04/insulin-resistance-the-real-pandemic.aspx

'The real pandemic' - ? ! ?

The reality beneath and succeeding the originally WHO seeded and media blitzed claim of highly infectious virulent pandemic has many factors - including the transmission of viral information - and the 'dysregulation' of the immune response resulting from multiple interventions/imbalances past and present. 

The level of fear is the leveraging of priority, such as to generate emergency that overrides all else BUT executive directives down the chain of command that expands and extends way beyond any scientifically sound justifications to operate martial law as a global coup d'etat. Under which a financial crash is managed as a social and political crush that is still being diverted from awareness under false premises.

So the active agenda running upon a 'not so different cold and flu season' is an unprecedented and unimaginably destructive deceit that humankind has been led into over generations.

The eugenic movement renamed to genetics (among various fronts) and went underground after ww2 - when the populations were found unwilling to democratically support their own culling and breeding controls. While the narrative regrouped under a self-righteous demonisation of industrially organised genocide as if a distinctly German and defeated ideology and as required ‘correctness’ (ie mapped out as a no go area).

While the idea of disease and sickness plays a role in animal nature of taking out the weaker members, the eugenic idea corresponds with the assumption of the right to define, diagnose and 'treat' the weak - and of course any undesirables who are unsupporting or obstructive to the idea of such self-serving elitism set over all others.

If there is any good argument to show that industrially organised degradation and denial of health and life is NOT in fact being enacted now - apart from throwing insult and smear - lets hear it. (Rank and file may believe or accept political or social narratives partly because they operate currency of social acceptance, and allow getting or keeping a job or funding and some sense of playing a worthy part in life - such as eradicating evils).

This is not to say there are not medical, social, economic and spiritual needs to address. But call out the basis of workability for the martial directives - from a willingness to join in what works for life - not for blind and heartless control systems set over all we hold dear.

Perhaps the passivity of an industrially denied population is at least in part, an inability to look on horror and so are compelled by it to look at some details or diversions of a dissociation.

But somehow the mind-trap has to be released - so as to bring the mind back into a present alignment instead of a dysregulated immune response.

What IS - or what ARE the immune systems?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161430

Pervasive and invasive toxins play a role - but what IS  - or what ARE the immune systems?

herein lies the key. As i suggested recently what we do to block, obstruct or undermine support for our health and life and self is often where we are not looking because it is part of our believed 'security' or protection.

What are the premises of the covid19 event?

Is not one of them the assertion that being 'novel' we have NO IMMUNITY to it and are therefore weak, defenceless and must needs run and hide behind what are essentially propaganda props?

Resilience, fortitude, resourcefulness, confidence grown of willingness to go for something worthy are all aspects of growing character.  If I sound like an old man now it is because a moral education has been thrown out by a social correctness compliance - that is top down or engineered - even in terms of generating astroturfed or fake movements.

Controlling human behaviours is very cynical and of course dehumanising to both the controller and the supporting role who gives over responsibility to 'Them' or to conditions - as if we have no participation in how we choose to see or respond - and so we run as a product of others or of a past put beyond change. Except of course, Orwell was almost right. Who commands the present, commands the past. Not controlling others or externals, but deciding how to see the world and others. We carry the past that justifies our present. Depression or dispiritedness easily finds the past that supports and sets the outcome in joylessness, lack of energy and motivation.

And the spell of any narrative fixation can be bolstered by fear, pain, lack and grievance no matter how cruelly it turns upon itself. If there is an 'answer' then it is fitted to the desire to find or be found in it - as our own call to life - given expression in our day, our relationships and endeavours. None of which are really added on, so much as regained as a result of releasing heavy burdens.

Having been brought up in a managed society, I am now living in a managed crushing of the global economy. I might wish the 'globalists' had something that felt workable and liveable - but its a captured and cloned collectivism being relentlessly fed expectation and passive compliance - is it not?

"Given the infectiousness of the virus"

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/?replytocom=160986#comment-160986 

I read this phrase; "given the infectiousness of the virus".

This is what I read from it;  Infection based on accepting the results of tests for RNA fragments of even very very tiny quantities of genetic code said to match or nearly match unique identifiers in a 'novel virus' supposedly discovered or determined from material taken from a few sick people in Wuhan that has not been isolated or purified in any real sense of the word, nor passed Koch's postulates, nor proven to be causation for a disease that HAS no distinct clinical profile.

Movie scenes: 1. A man gets on a horse. 2. Silhouette of man riding horse in distance. 3.Man and horse come to a halt at building. 4. Man dismounts and ties horse to rail.

The movie audience consents to be taken for a big ride. Most of the movie is in the mind of the audience - only a few props, suggestions and intentions set the drama in motion.

What then is going on but a pandemic of testing and fear driven assumptions of virulent contagion in a climate of fear that drives disproportionate and treatments and denials of treatments that are both assigned to the 'powerful disease' ?

The power of belief is its OWN reality, while being given power in the mind of shared agreement.

In the past - and around the world, many have and do believe and live the belief of things you would consider unbelievable or groundless. But are you so certain that what you believe today will in fact be found true when all the drama has passed?

History is written by the victor to support the claim or right to power - even in real-time, as our sense of narrative continuity and self-justification.

Are we not weaponising and marketising the cold/flu season as a means to use risk of infection as a basis for political and social controls unprecedented in our known history - on a global scale?

The viral contagion of fear activating code re-framing our mind works the deceiving of our thought and not the natural processes of the physical body.

Once invested in, emotionally and financially, running on false premises will persist as the momentum of its investment. Fear dictates the controls.

You may debate as to whether chicken licken and foxy loxy work as a team - or whether he always shows up as a random opportunist, but when the leaders of society and its media enact the headless chicken syndrome to cry "WOLF!", all parental and societal obedience training is invoked to take it seriously and presume it has substance.

Once invested in a lie, no true answer can be found until it is re-cognised or re evaluated and released from its status as ‘true’. While truth is feared, the lie runs as protection racket.

The fact of being denied the freedom to question an apparent or asserted fact, by setting the questioning as the 'dangerous threat to society' is all the proof required to illuminate fear in hiding - protected by a body of defences properly belonging to a transparency of communication in shared purpose.

Truth is not threatened by criticism and questioning.

'Post truth' social policy threatens criticism and questioning.

It only ‘asks’ in statements put in the form of question, or to frame a real question in an invalidating context.

If you WANT a lie to be true for you, then you have to be willing to deny truth in your own heart - in other words you know but don't want to know, and so give no attention or response.

The mind-worm says there is no 'truth' - but without truth - all is lawlessly and hatefully chaotic.

Hate may then become the sign of the need for for healing - but only when re-cognised as hurt, broken and betrayed love.

If we blame lovelessness on the choices of others - we lose the consciousness of HAVING choice!

Discovery Of A Novel Virus Is The First Thing To Question

Note: I have lost the reference to the context of this - but fairly sure it was on Malcolm's blog.

its basis was to question the validity of not of the test being used or the potential to make it more reliable so as to put the whole thing to rest and get back to normal. In other words the question saw the testing as the key to finding out what is really going on.

I suggest that the 'discovery' of a novel virus is the first assertion or assumption to be thoroughly investigated - not just as asserted and defined but as a proven cause of one condition - that is being presented as a specific disease without clinical symptoms in about half the population. Doesn't that ring doublespeak alarm bells for you?

The primary 'weapon' at work is the framing of the mind of definitions by which to distribute meanings that are emotionally 'loaded' with fear, blame and penalty.

Of course science is supposed to be empirically verifiable peer reviewed reproducible fact.

But all ideas evolve by their application and acceptance to become a basis of justification for the maintaining of narratives by which to evade and direct fear, blame and penalty.

Any system is only as good or workable as the integrity of those who run it. Collective evasion operates as socially invisible.

That somewhat separated out virus cultures are subjected to every kind of mutating effect - including now by splicing new code is simply fact. Probably resulting in auto-immune dysfunction - along with other exposures that undermine cellular integrity.

That viruses are not actually purely isolated in the way the layperson might imagine, means a soup of code fragments that can be from anywhere can be 'made sense of' or interpreted by consensus of an elite specialisation of employed or funded technicians as the 'official discovery' and held as THE standard and definition for tests, diagnosis, and interventions or treatments, to be derived.

Part of this includes the ability to 'clone' the interpreted viral code entity and then use it as the research model. This clone may then leak or simply be communicated into the 'wild'.

Note that if you run PCR test enough times you get 100% positive.

Note - the percentage of matching code required for 'identification' is variable at anything from 60-80% - and may include short sequences that may in fact NOT be unique to one so far 'discovered virus' out of trillions and so this is all a matter of  probabilities at best and programmed 'answer' at worst, with guesswork sitting somewhere in between.

The pathological virological model used is backwards in assigning agency to the code itself (virus). i sketch this out to invite a basis from which to question - rather than automatically run, a pathological belief on your operating system, by which 'Troy' is rendered defenceless from within.

Back to Normal - Conditioning can, and does, normalise anything

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/12/the-lockdown-is-not-a-way-of-beating-this-virus/?replytocom=161091#comment-161091 

I ask you to define more what you mean by normal.

Please.

We are being deliberately conditioned in my experience.

This isn't just ineptitude - but that isn't to say fools are not easily led.

To some, normal means a protected sense of control over the conditions of life and over others who might contest that and seek to 'take it back' - especially when their lives are at stake.

The breakdown of a false economy - or indeed a false medical model thus calls for a rstatement or reiteration of controls set over the lives of others - ostensibly masked in terms of others' safety being their paramount concern.

The linkage of covid with the 'Economy' is not arbitrary, but implicit.

Covid is being used as a pretext to contract and reshape the Economy - along the lines of a blueprint for a centrally planned (global) system of controls.

There can be no going back - even should the 'control agenda' fail to anticipate the living response. But culture is not a top down conditioning - unless you give unto Caesar that which belongs to the living. Culture is the expression of shared value or worth.

If normalcy drifts from a real relationship, it becomes hollow ritual that makes a sense of security out of numbness or cultivated indifference. At some point the 'denied' are bashing down your doors or rising up from beneath what you took to be your ground.

And so a crisis of adjustment is at hand - which does not have to be set in anyone else's agenda.

Fear that needs to be attended may be where answers are found, and fears that operate a diversionary circus ensure  that you are never found out.

Finding discernment in what seems a violating or obnoxious confusion is a matter of clearly setting priorities rather than comparing everything to a lost past. If you don't, someone else will set them for you.

I prefer natural to normal - but recognise that we all identify in and are adapted to an overlay of strategies of a learned and acquired 'nature'. When the mask slips - or contracts - we are interrupted in an otherwise unquestioned identity. Some seek any means to cover over what is exposed - and others seek a more transparent and open way of living from awakening sense of responsibility. How will we balance or integrate these desires? Or is the sacrifice of the living to run 'business as normal' for a primacy of fear and control?

Thanks for your post.

PS your questions on testing were addressed to a 'real' doctor. But as an undoctored bystander I see no proof of a new virus, nor of it being The Cause of A disease, nor of its virulence or contagion - so much as a pandemic of testing - that indeed could be finding tiny amounts of something that is said to be a 'close match' to a unique identifying RNA string of whatever has been defined and designated as Sars-Cov-2 - and assigned such novel properties as to have any or no clinical symptoms, or to mutate and adapt to any narrative twist.

In 1984 antibodies became the proof of infection instead of immunity for a new approach in virology. WHO decides? So you are already running with the bait of a set of assumptions that deny you the ability to zoom out and question - as I see it.

PCR is NOT a valid diagnostic test. It is worse than useless for such purpose and therefore useful to those who abuse it by treating it as if its results meant 'infection, disease or contagion'.

But on such does a global control agenda pivot.

Junk Identity and Food Control

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161114

Göran Sjöberg:

I just now happened to pull out one of the greatest books relating to the catastrophy of our “modern eating habits” from my bulging book shelf.Guess what book!Well, it is the book written by Weston Price after he had scrutinized the remaining “natural peoples” in the 1930th, i.e. those peoples who by then still had not been incorporated in the grain based way of living in the western world.“Nutrition and Physical Degeneration”published in 1938.When you have read this book and being ignorant to start with of what you put in your mouth you will not come out the same person when you have finished!It is about science!

My reply:

Perhaps the other side of that is Seeds of Destruction by F.William Engdahl. It documents the US aligned Military Industrial Complex (that effectively became the government after WW2), in the plan and process of weaponising food control first in the US and then globally. Beginning with the first 'green' revolution, setting up agribusiness as basis of a global control model.

This is not to say we cant degrade our health by poor diet without such systemic controls. Malnutrition and pollution associated with squalor and poverty as resulting in ill health is nothing new. But without an understanding of the rigged nature of the system we are prone to blame and penalise the people for the toxic debts of those who set up and manage the system.

This is how they 'get away with it'. 

Now it is the healthy who are risk factors to be quarantined and limited or socially debited - unless gaining a passport or status of 'health' as required by the rigged system that 'pharms' the sick and controls the cognitively impaired.

I hope to read Weston Price one day - though I have read many refs and summaries.

Only 'outsiders' can bring refreshment and renewal to inbred ideas. But when power is invested in an incestuous elitism hiding behind legally crafted scientific fraud, protected by penalty against challenging - the 'outsider' is seen as the 'virus' or threat to Society. New perspective does shake up invested identities - but need not be overly traumatic when given a PROCESS of transition. denial of legitimate right or voice leads to polarised and polarising conflict that only builds as a result of being armoured against. This has merit in being considered at individual or family and group levels as well as society as a whole.

Regulations against 'natural' harmonies and symbiosis are herding us to such agenda as biogenetic 'meat' substitutes. Choking the food supply being a context for the supply of microsoft bio-meat into every unit. to put a Commissar in every district, (to protect against un-ecological or unethical, dangerous and unhealthy ways of growing food without proper regulatory safeguards)

ShirleyKate: they don’t ‘give them junk food’, people buy junk food. Then they eat it. 

@ShirleyKate: Everyone buys junk narrative as identity support - and reinforces it by judging others.

Yes we junk our identity, and yet your view completely exonerates those who manipulate and feed such identities - as for example the MIC/US Gov determination to weaponise food and gain control of food supply. First in US and then globally.

'Moral' judgements blind us to the true contextual conditions.

The systemic pattern I see is 'toxic debts' dumped and divested to the population and environment - and in the individual - to their relationships and body.

We have to see the agency within its terrain - and not just focus on blocking, manipulating of suppressing the presumed independent agent, person or virus.

My posts do not get through here - but I try another route.

Scientism set in computer modelling

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161090 

Where would such a religion stand if mathematical modelling under regulatory definitions had to give way to empirical science? 

The interpretation of data - along with the setting of parameters for measuring and collecting it - is a specifically human contribution to the determining of an accepted model, to then apply to life - and either accept as aligning true or seek to challenge and reveal either better ways of interpreting the data or new data that renders the model unfit or in need of revision and modification.

Clinging to invested models is where what had started out as science becomes institutionally locked in dogma as a result of unwillingness to release the sense of possession and control that the failing model provided. This is characterised by the use of science as a stick of consensus by which to beat down (reasoned communication) along with carrots of funding and career opportunity in model reinforcement compliance.

in the context:

J.B Patten:

Perhaps you can’t see the atoms themselves, but to determine their locations, yeah, pretty much.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122623/

It’s easy to find answers to things like this on pubmed.

Gary Ogden responsed

JDPatten, I was interested in reading this, but he lost me near the end of the second paragraph with, “Scientists know the shape of proteins on the new coronavirus’s surface down to the position (sic) of individual atoms.” I don’t think so. Perhaps I missed it along the way (absent, maybe, or taking a nap), […]