Whack-a-Mole as loss of consciousness to systemic defence

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/06/02/how-does-covid-kill-people/#comment-164806 

David:

Why are a lot of infected people asymptotic? Do they have particularly healthy endothelia? And where does vitamin D fit into this hypothesis? * (see below for my response to this)

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick: (to David)

Because they have a good immune system and bat the virus away before it can do any damage.

To Malcolm:

This almost suggests a 'bad' immune system and 'naughty' viruses.

Why not allow a functioning immune system to be where natural viral response IS immune function, rather than where a ‘detoxing episode’ becomes framed as a 'life threatening pathogen'?

In this I assign such 'sickness' a role within health rather than as a source of fear and control for human (psychic-emotional and social-medical) interventions and impositions.

As well as toxicity is strain. Constant strain is a great burden on the resources and an episode of sickness can in effect force a rest that may save not just a stitch in time, but an MI - Heart attack.

Our accepted model is the context for our perceiving and reacting to our world.

The game of 'whack-a-mole is an attempt to  'make it go away' - and in a short term need - may be called for. You may want to allay a cold onset so as to deliver the speech you have been invited and paid - and travelled to deliver.  On the other hand you may be glad of an excuse not to have to attend a function that is compelled, meaningless and onerous.

My health changed radically when I became self employed within a sense of meaning and challenge that aligned me in joy in life. Great strain can be the 'normal' of a life never able to really happen.

The more we want something to 'go away' the more defences are set against it - normalised as structures that we lose the capacity to even imagine changing - while the 'pesky moles' take on more dissonance as a systemic breakdown that of course calls up systemic means to batten down or bat away feared conflict.

Feared conflict then becomes the systemic replacement for what consciousness once navigated with a sense of wholeness.

In my reading today I encountered research that states consciousness has been steadily decreasing - my own explanation being that of constant normalise strain of defences against unresolved conflict.  I duck-goed 'Gert Gerken' as the reference to what is in my printed book:

https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/losing-our-senses.129493/

snip/

The researchers at GRP now feel that over the past twenty-five years the brain of the 

average individual has undergone significant changes in its organization. The decrease in 

sensitivity to sensory stimuli implies that stimuli are being processed 

in a different way than before. Researchers hypothesize that there are fewer cross linkag-

es or networks in the brain; therefore primarily optical stimuli go directly to 

the optical center without activating other sensory or emotional centers. Thus 

human beings can take in very powerful stimuli that are discordant, senseless, or 

contradictory without being bothered. The trend researcher Gert Gerken has 

labeled this phenomenon "the new indifference." 

/snip

I note that this pattern applies no less to Science.

How normal are we willing to be?

'Whatever!' ?

Redesignating human being as an infection status that must subjugate its own life to protect a 'herd' that HAS no individual expression - excepting of course those who design and run the model. We used to call it the rat race, and seek to escape, but now it is more of a global experiment on human lab rats in which our safety is their paramount concern. (!)

Language structures the mind. "Watch it, you!" - If you value having one.

Awareness of the world around us may be too painful to bear - but may also facilitate recognising and releasing model frameworks that invisibly lock down and mask conflict into the body Corporate such as to protect a caged bubble from upset and offence.

David:

Why are a lot of infected people asymptotic? Do they have particularly healthy endothelia? And where does vitamin D fit into this hypothesis?

Because the term ‘infection’ is being abused. There are innumerable latent virus and bacterial functions within you at any given time. Are you thus a walking time bomb of contagion that could go off amidst an protected status of susceptibility that is in fact a likewise diverse Biotic synergy?(“Life Jim, but not as we know it”).

‘Asymptomatic infected people’ means ‘healthy people’.

Medicalising life as a source of profit and control works by framing health, life and nature in terms of an evil to eradicate, control, and manage – rather than Be and share in.

Its a technological version of St George that has in effect become the evil or chaos he thought to subdue.

Generally – life is a workability – excepting that it loses the ability to create workarounds to blocks, scarcities and conflicts that don’t resolve and operate as blocks, toxicities, imbalances and insufficiencies.

Allowing that a lot of iatrogenic and environmental stress or exposure is the result of unresolved human (relational) conflicts, we are effectively poisoning our own nest – perhaps most insidiously under the guise of boosting or manually taking over our ‘immune function’ (life).

Vit D has such a massive role within health (immune function) as to ask why did we agree to lockdown into hypothesis that framed us out of our natural environment of common sense health and fitness for a medicalised weakness demanding mass sacrifice of individual liberty – or else be assigned the status of virus by a Medical State?

The recent events are only closing the door on a herd that had already been domesticated and branded – bar a bit of shouting and some bio-technical track and tracery.

Where in all this is solid ground?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/

Quite apart from valid counts, are valid tests, for valid conditions or established fact.
Science shifted from empiricism to the computer model, and from empirically validated standards to convenient (model supporting) mathematical abstracts.

We (mostly) take on trust that a 'novel' (?) virus was 'discovered' in serum taken from a very very few suffering extreme respiratory reactions to extreme air pollution. Despite the fact that viral expressions (they come from living cells) constantly mutate - and are thus 'new' as a matter of course - and yet share the same basic profiles of symptom as other flus, colds, and coronaviral infections/expressions.

So where in all this is a 100% solid ground from which to begin science - rather than applying scientific processes to pet theories or subconscious fears given funding?

Zoom out and see that overall cause of death has more correlation with the lockdown - and so the scientific idea (if you need proof) is to challenge the correlation so as to disprove causation - yes? However, death is generally the result of a series of breakdowns of life support - which are personal (psychic-emotional) as well as social and environmental - now compounded by social and political hysteria which is none the less keeping an iron grip regardless any appeal to reason or call to account.

Like a game of musical chairs, when the music re-starts, there is less support for living. Initially this is those who die from their fear and isolation - and from the measures undertaken as defence. That this is a top-down orchestration is simply evident.

The idea of a mainstream 'reality' as a management system, that insiders are aware of as partial or false is part of any masked private agenda. A restructuring to vertical commands rather than horizontal interactions of communication and trust under structures of guidance and support for life.
We find out what love is by creating a world without it.
But what we give our love or energy and support to - remains our choosing.
The need I see is for restoring and holding perspective amidst polarising and self-reinforcing reaction.

There is an imperative operating through the few, set over the many - under various narrative justifications for 'orders' or paid employ. Insiders know more but are less able to speak even if they were moved to.

It's all very well to judge others - but we meet our own risk-assessment in terms of where do we draw our line as to what we say, to whom, whether we comply and the way we comply - and why. This is the realm of responsibility FROM which we meet with or communicate to others. We can all rush about (at home in our heads) with what everyone else SHOULD do or should never have done - but where is our voice at any table of social decision making?

I sense that a Reset was and is inevitable - but that those doctoring our Economy and engineering of Society want to manually manage the outcomes, by blocking our immune response and setting up bio-tech dependencies as a deeper level of control.

Under compression of severe challenge or impending death, we are often moved to align in the qualities and priorities that a life driven by worldly demands denied us. Making our peace and aligning in the joy of each moment as we can find willingness to recognise is also a healing modality - regardless the physical outcome.

Intuitively I sense there are many who intuit that fear is itself dangerous, and so they are indeed living a chosen bubble by which to not give fear the power to wreck their lives - even while the wrecking of the world we knew is being carried out with helicopter money and completely unsustainable premises. Force Majeure is being claimed by some as a way to escape contracts they can no longer keep. Is it an Act of God (as used to be used in legal documents) or is it the pre-emptive assumption of such an act under a manually usurped 'new world order'?
Somewhat like the premise of the vaccination - in which a limited sacrifice, operates the masking belief in defence from the feared Total Sacrifice - (and which of course DOES the thing it is premised to defend agaist).

Terrors from the deep are very real in their effects

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/#comment-164530

These 'what if's' are for what purpose?
I have read that in places where doctors can strike, the death toll goes down when they do.
However the belief that doctors save lives and are a bulwark against terror of death and disease is so deep set that no mere facts will make the slightest difference.

I now move from personal reply to general reflection.

We are in a time in which we can witness such deep set terrors in operation.
I read this morning a section of J Chilton Pearce (The Biology of Transcendence) on his childhood night terrors - which unlike nightmares always ran their full course and could not be interfered with by 'reality' - ie parents attempts to calm or reason an open eyed screaming child, for all stimuli fed the terror and became part of it. The terror eventually ran its course and left a complete amnesia accompanied by a dread of being alone.
At a certain age he determined to allow going into the dream and to remember it, which was the capacity to observe the event from a perspective outside its drama - and thus release it. This he did.

Terrors from the deep are very real in their effects - not least in our defences set up against them,
The main difference I see in our current collective terror - which is not really about an infectious virus but the activation of ancient fear, is that it was summoned or invoked by design. I recognise the cock-up theory offers a masking mitigation against such unthinkable or unbearable malice - but is not our recoil from this the 'blind eye' by which it operates as 'private agenda'?

The need to seek and find diversion by which to  avoid being alone with what we cannot bear will drive all kinds of agenda - but the willingness and readiness to go into it as the desire and determination to be free of running and hiding from it - is a development of character and consciousness of love of life - rather than clinging to fears.

Deaths are inherent to a realm of birth and unfolding experience, but killing is an intent that has repercussions on the giver and receiver that generate trauma that - unless truly addressed - does energetically manifest negative symptoms in the families and societies of its context.

By deceit, people can be induced to effectively kill themselves, in ways that leave the setter of the deceit free of blame or at least able to claim plausible deniability. Junkfood, weedkiller, polluting  manufactures, as well as inducing and fermenting fear, conflict and war - such as this one.
But regardless the legal shenanigans,and masking in obfuscations, the record holds the act of intent to denial as a backlog of debt, that of itself 'locks down' and denies future growth.

The weight of a great evil or terror cannot be escaped by masking in an increasing dense masking bubble - excepting as a binding to blind mechanism as some coded memory of what life might have been, set in targets of compliance where once the heart moved freely.

The point of looking directly at what is going on is not to feed moral outrage - though we meet it - but to uncover where our own identity masking has set beliefs that deny us a true appreciation of - and basis for - shared reality.

Fear of denial and exclusion - like a cornered rat - can strike out in last ditch defiance.
When this fear is shared by the 'establishment' as their vision of an inescapable future of breakdown, as fear of pain and loss - it is nurtured and grown as a global strategy of 'escape' - not for humanity but for their vision of control over its perceived unworthiness.

My sense is that compression is a natural process of refinement that comes to seed - (what could be a more compressed life form than a seed?) - that harvests or integrates the fruits of its prior expansion as a result of qualitative acceptance - or priorities. Conflicts cannot be pushed out into long grass when all is converging to a reckoning. But by what mind is the reckoning? Because the mind that generated the conflict can only operate the narrative of masking as an expression OF it.

And yet the very nature of fear given power of acceptance and belief, is to shut down the higher centres of consciousness that translate and embody qualitative intelligence to workable and practical action.

Here we are.


- - -


post #2

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/#comment-164532

How about holding the Media to account?
There would have been no pandemic without the lockstep media.
The hope of a political sovereignty in our political class or system is misplaced.
Financial parameters operate the ability to favour or choke back almost everything now – including global food supply and permission to leave your house or earn a living.
Financial and social restructuring is the underlying purpose of the pretext that works it intended purpose. The basis of our ‘economics’ is fraud and all else is necessarily captured or subverted to run and protect a society running on deceit – which can only operate destructively in self-reinforcing loop.

Living From Wholeness - A Shift of Perspective

in response to the themes in:

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162494 

I appreciate your response, but I am not writing from the predicates that are - to my understanding - the frame from which the problem is built-in - and this is why the reader's mind of such a conditioned or habitual presumption is not fed. It simply cannot translate into the old wine bottles and nor is that my desire. But that doesn't mean there is no bridge the the reader's recognition.

Bringing into a mainstreamed attention can indeed popularise ideas in seeking and finding agreement - but then the message is adulterated and diluted into marketing - which doesn't have to be for money - but for validation, self-reinforcement or attempt to lockstep alliances against feared or hated 'others'.

So I rest - truly rest - in the meanings that I share. And yet I am aware they are often very compressed or 'intense' - there's enough in a paragraph sometimes to make a chapter. 

But if a long slow process of adaptation is offered, be sure that the ego - or self-manipulative mind - will learn to pass off as true. That's it job description - and our learned expertise.

The sudden shift of recognition is not the refinements of a 'babylonian structure' of levels by which to define, divide and control - but a direct intuition - without any intermediary to your own being.

The apparent conflict between a 'fear and control mindset' and the direct intuition or felt quality of life is coming up to a head. But it isn't a conflict OUT there - it is our choice, now.

But a choice of priority - not of exclusivity. By all means let us use the mind and systems of control to serve the living. But not to replace it - or there simply is no living.

The dynamic of this pervades everything and so regardless what is or isn't said, the mind of a lockdown self isolating defence against loss of control as if loss of self, is founded on vigilance against love's honesty now - because it represents the weakening or loss of invested defences, identified in emotionally driven and necessary denials, lies and illusions.

No one is going to untangle what we have made WITH the tools or focus that made it.

Aligning in a transparency to presence is the allowing of the undoing of such identity in fear and guilted lock in as we are willing to release.

But all that I am saying gives power to the process of genuine curiosity and sharing in the discovery of healing anything - as bring it back from a specialised isolate to a direct integrality within a wholeness of being.

Witnessing from wholeness must meet the defences (attacks or denials) of the choice for self-isolation under fear's control, but also pass through the temptation to react in like kind and effectively rejoin the reinforcement and witnessing to a crab-barrel world. So I respect our freedom to choose against what we are not ready and willing or moved at all to engage with as long as we own our own decision rather than guilting and blaming others for our attempt to shut down, wall off or eradicate what we are effectively choosing to ignore for our own reasons,

By all means let Shaun move on - but realise that power is known by having already done it.

By all means ask me to limit my input so as not to fill a page with long posts that perhaps few find any movement or moment to alight in. Ask and be answered. Its easy. But it opens relationship - and that is where our fears are already enacted as a pre-emptive judgement that replaces relational freedom with contracts and rules of ritual exchange set in manipulative avoidance.

We were already normalised to a lockdown, social distancing, and conformed compliance and it is already a great strain of death and taxes on our unfolding a shared experience of who we are. It is the human conditioning - regarded as a noun or concrete hardwired fact.

Now, as T.S Elliot offered, "we arrive at our starting place to know it for the first time". How so? Because it was first set in division, fear, confusion of unknowing. Now it is given us to look on from a new point of perspective. Fear's toxic debts cant be 'hidden' by clever accounting and more comes into the open. We might to be retching out what does have a true belonging rather than locking down further into denial. Perhaps the 'Reset' for some may be of the same order, but only as they are willing to accept or choose this for themselves. 

No one can choose for another. But the intent to do so will entangle those we seek to control. if others play along in outsourcing their responsibility as if to escape consequence, there will be a  'joining' for keeping the appearance of a mutual getting device that locks in a parent-child  - and a child-parent manipulation at expense of genuine relationship as the basis for life and growth.

Below is the context.

Jerome Savage 

Sorry Binra

Read that twice & still cant quite grasp your message

Shaun Clark 

Jerome, Can we move on? Whomever this is he /she is a fruitcake. Sorry

I regard your comment as exactly what a disinfo troll would get paid for, by sowing discord, undermining trust and limiting communication under cover of pretended familiarity. It seems to be a habit of yours. If you have something of substance to say – man up and say it.

(Why Malcolm do you give any support to posts of no point but scapegoating smear and incitement to social exclusion? ) 

I include myself by reason of interest and participation in the issues and themes raised. If you are only looking for what gratifies your personal terms and conditions – then you must meet so much to despise in your life and yet take such satisfaction pushing it from your mind.

But your mind is going with it.

The underlying issue behind the covid19 pretext is control of communication.

Masking as a need to protect life – while actually feeding more control to a destructive control agenda. That infantilised and mindless people are induced to suck on and applaud!

If you can show evidence to the contrary, I welcome hearing it. If you want to shut me down then I identify you as that agenda – regardless your presentation of ‘matey’ direction as if the moderator is absent and the inmates can take over the asylum. I’m not saying you cant try. But then you get your results in kind. The same will apply to mad people who try to rule the world.

KJE
Now that was easy to understand. Basically, you tend to write in jargon and use what are unfamiliar terms to most people – that’s what is meant by “fruitcake”. If you wrote in plainer language, you’d probably find that most people agree with you or can at least understand what you have to say and comment accordingly

- - - - - - - -


a short follow up to another post by teedee126:

As someone who volunteered for years at a Crisis Centre, I dealt with people on all points of the mental health spectrum, but the one thing that many callers had in common was a feeling of intense loneliness, mainly brought on by the despicable stigmatism against the mentally ill. It was heartbreaking that their families, former friends and coworkers, as well as their own GP’s and sometimes their Psychiatrists, who above all should know better, all made them feel ‘less than’ as a person.I found it despicable to see someone on this thread called a “fruitcake” and dumbfounded as to why the comment was allowed to be posted in the first place. Regardless what any of us think of Binra’s writing, whether we get something of value from it or find it difficult to process in our often tired minds, that was inexcusable and has me questioning a comment I once made about this site being ‘an island of comfort and sanity’ or whatever it was I said. It’s very much a place of favouritism and cliquism in some cases, but why that should disappoint or surprise me is something I’ll have to work out for myself.

At risk of over-commenting - it is how we respond to problems when they come up, that establishes our character or culture - not an ideal of perfect freedom for having them.
I have no axe to grind on my own account but if we don't support the principle of communication, why be surprised when we suddenly find we no longer have it - or feel so self-censored as to lock-down and self-exclude?
See how easily our fears can trigger reaction! I don't mean that in blame to anyone but simply to promote vigilance to pause and consider before acting from our first emotional response. I of course include myself in that invitation.  To be safe we have to honour our current sense of where we choose to be in relation to our world. There is no safety as such in the world. Growing trust together is growing a safety that includes accepting differences, respectfully. If we replace all such (at times messy) process with systems and rules - we can have our problem free robotic world order.
Problems must then be opportunity for growth rather than a way to fund a private agenda at expense of the whole - when we step back from them rather than jump in.

We have and are the right and the freedom to uncover a gift in anything

Can someone really argue that autism is a gift? What ?

We have and are the right and the freedom to uncover a gift in anything - but no one has the right to usurp or pre-empt that by their own imposition.
There is both a beloved, and a heartbreak compounded by injustice - under which one either deepens a faith in life for the living, or loses it to a cover story seeking lockstep agreements to set against the pain of not only the above - but also shame of self betrayal.

This pattern is also seen in covid-mind-masking as mind capture under an escape-narrative from self-conflicted fear. It is a very hard place to be in when your sense of self and world fall apart. That's the last place we would go - and so we often try to leave it to the very last minute and never actually share the gift of a life we are effectively running away from.

Suffering CAN initiate a journey of waking compassion - but only to the willingness to both give and receive love's acceptance. Those who evangelise for what they have not truly accepted for themself are always dissociated from their own rage and terror and so it leaks out in all kinds of unintended consequences. On the other hand using our own or anyone else's victimhood as a political or identity agenda is underhand and deceitful.

While our world depends on short-cuts and labels - I see that everyone has and is their own unique version of 'whatever' and need not be defined BY it. Whatever we take definition from becomes 'god' to our choice to accept it. It tells us who we are and frames how we respond.

The danger of any litigious or grievous claim is investing in the wound as the means to vindictive vengeance instead of justice. But bitterness poisons the accuser and those around them.
The dedication to truth in the service of others  releases the personal agenda to a path of honouring truth and true witness, above the means to mask, hide, and evade it that persist the lie along with its tragic consequence.

Unless new evidence convinces otherwise the denial or attack upon the biota of our world and gut is effectively cauterising us from our life support biologically, emotionally and mentally.
Self-isolated, locked down and effectively behaving in a cancerous way. Don't blame the virus.
Unless of course coming OUT of lockdown is more fearful than all the devils we know.
In this sense I am using the term for a human consciousness that became pathologically normalised.

The underlying dynamic we cannot and need not escape

I just noticed Siddel's twitter dump within the comment I had replied to.

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162148

(My email notification of the post did not show it).

The agenda reveals a mouthpiece. Siddel supposedly self-launched himself to covid fame with a kitchen report, still sweating from the trenches while frantically entreating; 'This is not a virus!'.

Whoever he may represent, he is restating the core hypnotic suggestions by which the many are accepting dehumanising degradation and a course in social-relational (spiritual) death assenting to bio-slavery, as willing compliance to a control agenda that has NO willingness for real communication. Who listens there WANTS this on one level or another.

There is no treating with it BUT to hold it at heart as released of legitimacy from alignment in our own appreciation - while IT runs its course. What makes NO sense, inherently attacks and undermines all sense to take in or be taken in by. To take offence is to act from already being attacked - and thus invested.

This 'control agenda' is locked down, socially isolated and isolating, and treating a situation of living and called for communication as contagious threat - but love is not contagion. Love belongs here. Fear is the estranger.

The underlying issue here pertains to Communication in the fullest meaning of the word. New science is uncovering us to a Universe and a Biosphere of communication that is of vibrational resonances within self-organising expressions of dynamic equilibrium. I will uplevel from quantum observations (or downlevel from plasma cosmology) to the matrix of micro-biota as the foundation of our biosphere. If we seek to kill or enslave this 'Mater' we set the measure of our own receiving. No one else is ultimately responsible for our own choices to give our will to others, or to circumstances.
Our self justifying narratives do not resolve or truly escape consequence. Repackaged debts are still called in.

The basis of consciousness as cell or self of larger living system, is the balancing of inner and outer conditions as an interstitial medium of total communication - within which are relatively distinct domains that are integrally participant and yet also themselves.

The nature of a traumatised human consciousness is a loss of the field or embracing sustenance of connection and communication, to a contracted sense of isolation and control surrounded by an 'alien' threat. Under specific conditions of threat, this is our 'reptilian' brain. It has functional necessary service to preserving the life of the body. But under trauma, it will override all higher functions and operate against its own true function. Self-destructively. A fully closed system in which control has conquered life, is death.

The willingness of aligning in control agenda paints itself in a corner from which there is no way out and the cost of survival in such terms demands always greater un-humanity to be accepted as normalised sacrifice that will never be paid off. 'Infection' with innate intelligence  awaits required or mandated official treatment? I object! And I let it be known that I object.

The demands of a phase of compression naturally occur when a period of expansion reaches chaotic disequilibrium call for qualitative refinement of purpose. But to invested identity may feel like being crushed or deeply threatened, and invoke regressive contraction from life in a stricture of death, instead of to the seeding synchronicity for a new phase of expansion.

When we are triggered, we literally operate a dissociated and dissociating persona and are not in our right mind. Conditioned, triggered, and controlled by hated fears - or loved hates.

Releasing trauma, or conflicting elements set in grievance, is necessarily to revisit the triggering conditions in willingness to uncover new perspective that is wholly recognisable and understandable as an appreciation, shared.

Postscript:

KJE:

How much of that was actually In English? I could have filled a buzzword bingo card. Just sayin’

Hateful propaganda can be coined in English and believing we understand it can and does deliver us unto evil.
From where would you question your current presumptions, terms, conditions and demands that deliver you to the world you judge as real? Many not only don't question, nor does it ever actually occurred to them to do so. Nor can they follow any who do.

Covid-capture syndrome is a state of dissociation under which the subject simply refuses to see, hear, understand or accept anything that is not mandated by a lock-stepped mind.

It is the privilege of those who step outside of such locked down meanings, to be mistranslated by an intent to immunise against feared truth. Truth never has been locked into words, but embodies and is given witness in truly shared meanings. As distinct from 'Newspeak' in which anything means whatever Big Brother says it means today regardless what it meant yesterday or shall mean tomorrow.

When you sign off in feigned retreat as 'Just saying' you illustrate a way of undermining what you have to say in self depreciation. Perhaps to pre-empt someone else reacting in a way you don't want to have to engage with or stand up to? Why not say truly 'just' things and stand in them - while you are alive? Why not aspire to grow a better experience of yourself and your life instead of looking for something to 'relieve yourself' on?

Perhaps you can share what YOU see as motivating a huge and intentional contraction of the global economy set under draconian reaction to a pretext for panic, meekly followed and even applauded? Why would anyone choke back supply but to set controls over the lives and minds by conditioning the behaviour of another's 'normal"?

At the moment the political will is a Gated community.

We may choose or be moved to focus on any aspect and at any level of a rich drama unfolding, and that is our freedom. I take no less and no more than that, and share it to any who at least dimly recognise the drama operates a negative self-reinforcing loop. But if you have something to say - why don't you say it instead of dumping on those who - for your own reasons - you take offence from. Show that you are not 'just sayin' things to provoke division and distrust?

Magical Beliefs Oppose And Undermine Our Life Support

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162062 

I note your assumption that Cov19 only began when scientists 'discovered' it and only spreads as we test for it, and also note that Sars-Cov-2 has not been demonstrated to CAUSE an 'infection or disease' that has no clinical symptoms in about half or more of its 'hosts' and variable clinical mostly mild symptoms that are shared with other respiratory diseases and which viruses (of association) are also present but not tested for. (Though I saw one account where this was done and of course CV19 was not the only virus detected as present at some degree in the host.

But giving one thing exclusive priority renders all else in its image.

I suspect along with Fred Hoyle, Zach Bush and no doubt others, that the winds (meteorological conditions) carry genetic info all around the biosphere - just as they transit intercontinental teeny weeny spiders. Would UV level affect this communication network in the light that the higher spectra of UV deconstructs all viral structures. Perhaps there is too much of this in the summer?

While I don't see virus as The Cause, I do see it as genetic messaging that includes instructions - ie: to initiate defences against toxicity in the lung (periodically or as triggered by new toxicological - environmental alerts).

Of course life doesn't have to make sense and concocting superstitions and magical rites against an ultimate meaningless torture is all one can resort to in lockdown against it and thus seem to make sense by opposition. I hold that magical beliefs are what conflict with and oppose or undermine our life support. Especially when we intensify our investments to protect them from re-evaluation in the light of failure. 

Truth and war

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-162089 

Janet Love commented on COVID Update – Focus on Vitamin D.
in response to Mr Chris:
David Ferguson is an interesting case of modern news management The story about his private life has been around for a month, suddenly it appears in four right wing newspapers on the same day Secondly all of sudden someone brings to David Davis’s attention an analysis of his model very nicely written, demonstrating that the […]

The ‘TRUTH’ is always the first and *enduring* casualty in politics / war.
– as the wind veers, so do politicians, setting sails to gain future advantage.
Methinks the UK govt dropped the ball at the start, and this is part of ‘catch-up’ …

in response to the themes above:

I hold this basic recognition runs more deeply than is commonly supposed.
IE: it is not a speaking of a world out there - or others - that by engaging war, then kill the truth.

Truth is unconflicted in itself, while conflict is a state of partial of conditional relation of dissonance.

If you want something to be true (in a way) that isn't, as your own way of organising or managing your experience, then you set up a bias or torsion of dissonance, which you can put to one side or set the mind to 'ignore' while pursuing something you want. If you know you are doing this you use the mind as a tool. If you become exclusively invested in the tool you become 'tooled'.

In a sense then we can sacrifice (awareness of) wholeness of being in exchange for a world we (think we) want. Because we can give truth to a partiality or an illusion, we can also suffer it.

Within collectively reinforced illusion, suffered as if true, we have essentially become subjected and controlled by the impulse to subject and control our world. But our experience is not at all as if we do this unto our self, but that what we are taking ourselves to be, (conditioned by experience to accept true of us), is set in struggle or powerlessness of entanglement in polarised reactions that effectively set order or an appearance of balance that is actually stagnant and life-denying, such that the strain or burden undermines the will to live that is our vital capacity of survival and creative growth or life - but actually in expression - not bottled up in virtual rehearsals.

Judgement is the mind of substitution and replacement of truth. It is inherently a mind of limiting, selecting and rejecting, that when applied to the living, divides to rule, and sets the rules of its own rejection and denial. While we invest in the struggle to enforce or conform others or narrative reality to comply to our judgements, we are given to the truth of what we think we want or need, from a past set in separation trauma or war within self. We all have unique and different patterns of loss of love, or subjection to fears, doubts, shames, or hateful sense of inadequacy in regard to the life, family and world we are born into. And we all learn to varying degrees, to insulate or mask over from painful, feared or hated truths that we have taken into our core beliefs without any process of conscious reflection but simply the impulse of love, life and survival. For the impulse of love without self-differentiation, will take on the pains or fears or depression of others as its own and even sacrifice its life in attempt to address the unresolved issues of another - that do not truly belong and are biasing or blocking the true expression of one's life by a belief we have to be what we are not - or not be what we are. This is war set over the truth on its own unique expression, but is experienced as patterns of life that are in effect a script of conditionings that automatically operate from that early core sense of self and world but with more sophisticated strategies of rationale and masking behaviours as a result of learning and adapting a self to its world... and a world to its self.

In practical terms, I hold truth to be discerned - and in truth moves within our awareness as the gift of noticing. Discernment is an acceptance of the whole instead of a pre-processing censor and narrative that rules by ruling out or limiting in order to enforce a negatively maintained bubble of segregation and defence. It is discernment of love's honesty as the true and spontaneous or unselfconscious flow of being that is denied and blocked by fear or conflict given power. This is what results in lockdown, self-isolation, a driven need for allies in 'lockstep' and sacrifice of a commonwealth for a realm of private control, set in defences that need fear and threat as fuel and funding while presenting a narrative front of the emergency of solving them. 

This holds the underlying alloy of love and hate that characterises the human conditioning as a result of seeking to establish love within the 'unfaced or unowned terrain' of the hateful.

And so the reclaiming of our lives must open to and pass through the hateful and the feared so as to address them truly - instead of fight-flight and the freeze or lockdown into a state of displaced identity in a world on which we have cast out not only our denials, but the truth and wholeness of a love that we simply are, that is, and knows itself in being the gift of itself.

War is the first casualty of love's honesty. But we cannot make love and paint it over hidden hates but only set a cruel and hollow parody of life against which opposition seems more virtuous, and gives hate a license to kill. Recognising hate as hurt and locating the hurt in the heart is a discernment not a thinking that seeks to apply itself on a judged hatred.

Fear of loss of face is humiliation, rejection, exclusion and invalidity.  All core facets of separation trauma. The undoing of such a pattern from automatically running is the desire and willingness to be released from its pain of conflict - on all levels of its expression, so as to be truly moved in who we are, what we do, share in, discover and embrace as our experience or part in a whole that holds us integral, connected and connecting, and awake to our responsibility for listening or receiving the gift of noticing, rather than sleep in the mind-habit of a gift we thought to take for ourself alone and apart and special. Uniqueness is the signature of wholeness in all Creation.

Every moment is its own unique expression. The database of past learning is not that which produces the future, but the palette of experience from which we choose. But in order to BE a choice, we must be awake as to what we are choosing between instead of programmed into defaults that are set to old patterns of action that have never been consciously re-evaluated.

Listening will arise naturally from asking a real question. The willingness and desire to know runs counter to the invested beliefs of a set mind, narrative identity or established thought system. Hence we are liable to ask pseudo questions that are really statements of self reinforcement in the form of a question, or maskings in the form of love or concern, such that the forms of mutually agreed meanings operate their own hidden code and effectively dictate or set the rules for an officially sanctioned reality - within which are every kind of polarised struggle, and yet all of which operate in unison against the recognition and witnessing of truth - whose movement reveals  meaning as extending, expanding and integrating of all that it is. While all that is not, is already released, or not here - without any process of demonisation denial or masking over.

The creative is the infinite potential to alight in. And patterns of consciousness that are grown for specific goals, find their true function in true alignment.

Truth centres. A battle of illusion of truth with illusions sets an off centred inertial fulcrum. We can become lost in our own spin. But yielding to the centre is not a surrender to 'other', even if release of a self-centred investment seems like imminent death or disaster. The key is to live the willingness of the moment of the gift of noticing, instead of rehearsing plans, and setting conditions for the plans and sacrificing life to the conditions that serve the plans.

Whenever we succeed in achieving what we thought we wanted, we discover, that that wasn't it.

perhaps it then serves a greater learning, unless we merely persist the same pattern with new symbols for what we ultimately and already are.

I look for healing and correction not vengeance

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/comment#162016

I'll use up one of my three lives to say that - like a cat - I wont put my full weight on what you are hoping to be true. But I can and do leave the future open and hope for a shared waking from a false sense of life to a true by any means - or simply - just because!

I look for healing and correction, not vengeance. That may sound soft and vengeance may seem strong - but only by addressing what is truly here can he find our right place or response to it. Raging at shadows that can never really be eradicated nor need be is futility and vanity in one.

My sense of the old paradigm winding up is of a diminishing turf and thus turf wars. Which could  escalate to open wars. I don't see the 'elitists' as being willing to face the consequences of an entanglement in lies and corruption that goes way back and down deep. But at the same time, there is no other path to peace than setting or debts, releasing and finding release. Destruction of our world or our consciousness of it is not an answer, so much as a refusal set in our own terms as some form of 'See what you made me do!'

So I have said that I don't see the globally orchestrated lockdown as a blunder - although many are hapless and easily led. Or already bought, trained and fed.

However at root I see we all make mistakes that became a basis for fear, self isolating and attempt to mask over and control our reality against exposure that damns us. Shakespeare and other Tragicomedies illuminate our archetypal patterns. We cannot be free while trying to escape a mask we made ourself and then suffered at the hand of fate or others.

The willingness to truly address corruption would HAVE to set a new economic and social model. But I do not see those who are active in such corrupt thinking as the ones to set the framing or terms of the new. Nor would it BE new. Nor would it be workable within a new context that they simply cannot control, any more than a boat can control the tides.

There is no going back - and never has been. But the 'normal' is what we are conditioned to expect, to see and to do. Discipline of awakened purpose are 'self-conditioning' in the sense of making new choices to set a new habit in place of an old that has been transformed to the level of choice by owing it.  If we do not accept and live our responsibilities - someone else will take over.

Perhaps life is not a destination to survive in or perfect, but a journey of awakening potentials that opens perspective of a presence that we forget, mask over, and believe irrevocably lost.

Zach does touch on this at the end.

https://youtu.be/Zk9NIyc9JlA?t=3305

Theories believed mask as fact and used as basis for laws become official facts

in response to the themes in:

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/?replytocom=161988#


Theories believed, masquerade as facts - and once used as basis for law become official facts.
The beliefs about actual transmission of viral information are generally just that.

Likewise the superstitions set up to defend, counter or protect.
But the consequence of our actions have real effects.

Unless otherwise shown wrong, I accept that I live in a viro-sphere or viro-soup of trillions of communication packets that travel through the winds that are the breathe of our Biosphere, unless in water droplets when they may travel a number of feet. Without which life on Earth would cease.

Nanoparticulate and environmental toxins and exposures are the common risk factor for Respiratory disease - including lack of nutrition, microbiotic health, exercise and sunshine - along with strain and depression or dis-inspiration from our lives.

I am getting the impression that many places has already 'had it' as a bio-communication update with little or no symptom BEFORE lockdowns were imposed. the discover of America was novel to the Europeans, who as principalities presumed the superiority of race backed by technology and I think - and insane history driving them to GET rather than be part of.

'Reality is what I have just told it it has been! Now we must all get in step with what I tell you we must do...'
The Mistaking of hindsight as sight is the blinding ability to judge the present as the past - as the usurping of a true presence. Thus a past made in grievance or fear, stamps upon the face of a controlled 'present' as a kind of narrative continuity of 'I told you so!' - which can never be whole, at peace or rest because presence is not as the model dictates - and has to be locked down and only move in lockstep or be sent to Room 101 (More Orwellian reference).

If you tried to catch a cold do you think it would be an easy thing to guarantee?

Note - all the funding and media attention and 'consciousness' such as there is - will follow the drama of the virus, as something that asserts priority as a narrative investment - without any real questioning of almost anything about it.

Why do some people (at some times of their life or in some locations or conditions) 'catch' viruses and other not? Or indeed why of all those who show the indication of such a virus under tests, most of them have little if any clinical disease symptom.

Chasing the wrong suspect is the most lucrative research and development you can get - as long as the crime can be set as an ongoing threat and the suspect flagged to invisible knobbly spheres - which are neither proven to be this exact suspect nor to cause the conditions - mild or severe or fatal - that are being associated with it.

More likely is toxicity and a compromised or undermined immunity - and that is where medications and antibodies from flu vaccinations, lack of Vit D and all the rest - including an induced state of terror  and fear of connection with the lives of others - come into play.

The Lockstepped Media

To the themes of a conversation in which a media brand was extolled as a worthy source of news.

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161909

You are still ok with the brand that 'suits you sir', but many have become aware that despite apparently taking turns to present some sort of plausible denial for being organs of state, (or of a captured and Gated 'state of affairs'), ALL of the established media brands are effectively the lock-stepped media. Unless you have awareness from outside the narratives of confinement you MUST seek and find your identity and thought within them.

I don't see any need to be hostile so much as essentially extend a disregard to what is only of interest in seeing what the mind-captured are being told to think or find diversion in.
But when something that is pretending to serve a public news service is lauded as if it really does - then it is put up to be pulled down.

The questioning of everything about this pretext for a globalist power grab that is  - as we speak - reorganising how government and society is to operate in its newly conditioned state mandated Paramount Safety - is  conspicuous by its absence from any officially accepted 'news source'.

Your example of merit is an extremely token 'challenge' to what is being rolled out over the destruction of civilisation as we have known it - and for all it faults and horrific underbelly - it still holds some continuity for unfolding the potentials of our human being.

By all means you are free to choose where to go for your information and support - and abide in who you feel yourself to be regardless the opinions and judgements of others.  It may be that people in any walk of life meet a line they are not willing to cross, or an integrity they are unwilling to forsake - and this might result in getting an article published despite editorial concerns - or after receiving editing to meet those concerns.

Hitchens and Sumption were willing to speak their genuine concerns into an emotionally generated storm. They are willing to debate rather than consent to the imposition of 'truth' that denies any real debate. The Telegraph was and is no less instrumental in pushing such a propaganda blitz as all the others. If you do not recognise war propaganda, you could review all of its behaviour with a critical discernment rather than already reacting to its payload.

Instead of taking steps to shift paradigm, the elites dig themselves into a much deeper set of denials as if fear and coercion can inaugurate a new world order. But they don't want anything truly new, so much a more effective ways to consolidate control from an illegitimate intent to possess. Because they can dictate new laws by which to protect their lack of substance only demonstrates or proves a lack of substance.

'Comply and conform or we will hurt you'.
also expressed as 'Your safety is our paramount concern'.
If you learned how to read bollox as bollox - you might be less willing to suckle poisoned milk.

I don't ask you to trust me or tell you I can be trusted - but extend trust TO you as worthy of an honouring communication - even if we disagree. Because communication and relationship are what is being targeted and sacrificed to a false god that can NOT protect, guide, support or sustain - excepting by the redistribution of human sacrifice to its demands as 'normal'.

Team Trump or Tooled Trump?

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161782

teedee126 commented on COVID Update – Focus on Vitamin D.
in response to Binra (@onemindinmany):
Trump is played as a wild card to shuffle the pack. Is he his own man? Not in my opinion. But insofar as your criticism – surely it applies no less to most all the rest? But the professional political class presented a kind of groupthink that Trump does not at least overtly support. The […]
The only ‘team’ Trump has ever been on is Team Trump, and I’m going to just leave my remarks there for now.

But teedee126 does it occur to you that the greedy are those who are selected and tooled by the manipulative?

Goldman Sachs looks to be one of the most represented teams in continuous office – and I have NO sense they would allow ANY election not to be a selection.

Every front man is used for their particular image and brand and for the most part power doesn’t come to the front, but uses a masking persona – and indeed a constantly shifting and polarising effect is all part of the sleight of mind.

The image of the many headed hydra comes to mind. They are one thing – but can each seem to act as a front. Cut one head off and seven more grow.

Trump is consummately branded to both appeal to those who hate virtue signalling lies and so take joy in their exposure, and as to set off hate in those whose virtue is set in ‘resisting evil’ (to quote Jesus) rather than aligning in the truly Good.

There is no one who is fit to judge another.

But our fruits or behaviours are accountable.

In this difference is freedom from deceit.

Sefishness could be discussed further.

But note how the self and hate are so closely associated.

You are a self, you have needs and interests and right of being and are unique in being you.

Monopoly is associated with dominating and controlling and denying others – and can use all and any masking deceit to do so – including good cop, and bad cop.

Shooting at a barn door at point blank range does not expand your skill set!

Medica Mafia

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161788 

“Who the hell is Bill Gates to deliberately scupper a vaccine safety commission? How are Bill and Melinda Gates wielding so much power, these unelected people who are dabbling and interfering in the lives of billions? ” Excuse me, but this is totally illogical. You are quoting Bill Gates VOICING HIS OPINION in a conversation with THE PRESIDENT OF THE US. The only person who could “scupper” the commission, then, was Trump, because he is the decision-maker; the boss, in other words. So – who is this Bill Gates person to deliberately express his opinion to an elected official? A citizen of a country dedicated to free speech, no less (America is still that, I hope?). And it is the job of the elected official – especially the highest of them all – to *choose the best recommendation to follow*. Short but not sweet: if the president of the US is silly enough to make decisions about health isssues on the basis of a programmer’s say-so, then it is the president who is the problem, not the programmer.

While there is truth in that your decision is your own responsibility - even if there is a gun pointing at your head, you are clearly unaware of the system that runs behind appearances.

The reason such controls can operate a bloodless (so far) global coup, is that covert networks of control are merely being rendered as overt power. There is no real national or economic independence - unless permitted as appearance by a system of perception management.

'Confessions of an Economic Hit Man' comes to mind for the principle at work.

Gates is an active player to a point, but is still a messenger boy for a larger network of control - and a poster boy (kindly grandad) for the public perception.

Fauci is running a similar role and for a while took over the presidency.

Whether Trump - as a representative of his network of interests - has any real independence from 'The Family' or is merely contesting a turf war - who knows?

But Mafia is the pattern of organised crime. Crime in this sense is knowingly set against the law of life, and not a misdemeanour to be corrected as part of aligning in a now recognised integrity.

'The Medical Mafia' is another book that may seem extreme but is simply evident once the blinders are off.

Personalisation of issues into 'Trump and Gates' or US and UN, always operates a diversion to the underlying themes of deceits that we are perhaps unknowingly party to and WANT not to know.

Responsibility has been substituted for by blame.

The ability to consider, to question and to know for our self, is our ability to respond.

If we do not live our responsibility we invite, oblige or even demand other forces to run in our name. But we never truly escape our responsibility - regardless how blame can be apportioned, ingeniously evaded, or simply blotted from our (thereby self-limited and locked down) mind.

Do we have any idea of the nature of the 'new world normal'?

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161794 

Indeed. Though the vaxtracked social credit system goes far beyond merely gathering revenue from mandatory product placement into our DNA.

UK Column News are offering good UK coverage of what is to me clearly a restructuring of government, law, and society under pretext of a virus lockdown. Corbett report is also willing to speak in mostly sane ways to the underlying patterns that have been unfolding to such a pass throughout our lifetimes.

Where is our true immunity to the fear that lies, for controls that tyrannise?

I call on the truth of love, as the love of truth, to undo fear's contagion in my mind, and deny giving power to lies that would sacrifice all that truly lives and loves life, in exchange for notional security systems that demand such sacrifice be re-enacted in perpetual payment.

Because whatever corruptions are derived that cover us in conflict, limitation, lack and loss, the core essence of life remains itself, innocent.

I have a sense that after war experience, there are some whose sense of human capacity is so deep in disgust as to shun society and seek the natural world for its touchstone of honesty of grounded stillness of being. Perhaps there can be no real renewal in health of cultural wholeness without going into the arena and experience of what needs to be thoroughly released of value and allegiance or else will by nature corrupt or self-sabotage all seemingly positive endeavour.

Do we have any idea of the nature of the 'new world normal' that is being successfully instituted to a prepared and willing compliance? Perhaps we do - but cant bear to look and so concern ourselves with diversionary minutiae.

BTW there are fresh updates on the 

https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/

also to the same site

https://swprs.org/corona-media-propaganda/

'Follow the science' = deny the science and comply with orders.

'Save lives!' = your lives are under our jurisdiction, if you show your compliance you may mitigate your condition or be considered for protection or restored privilege.

'Stay home' = we have taken ownership and control of rights to the natural world and freedoms of travel. You are now to connect through electronic infrastructure of surveillance and control and to be a node of such as part of restored mobility.

'Save the NHS' - means that the medical mandate is to be the principle resort of the state to disregard the right to individual personhood. IE: Your rights to your body are overridden by the rights of eradication programs.

etc

On the other hand, the breeze coming through the window is of an exquisitely beautiful spring morning. "That the birds are singing now! There is no other guarantee, that singing, will ever be!".

waking other people up is another form of virtue signalling

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-161683 

On best ways to promote vaccine risk awareness

Are you presuming a right to force people to accept that they are willingly putting their children in harm's way - by an expression of their protective love?

The idea of waking other people up is another form of virtue signalling is it not?

When people are ready they are already coming into contact with information or experience from outside their bubble. Perhaps if they are not ready, they focus on the self-righteous pushiness (such as we can all at some time enact), that reinforces retreat and defence instead of willingness to listen.

The art of discerning the true will in others and joining them might first honour their current choice as their right, without reinforcing it as right. In relationships we are always a beginner - or else we jump in with assumptions taken from another context. I quite understand that our own emotional outrage is both maddening and unhelpful - unless it can be channelled to learning how better to be a channel or serve a channel of communication.

However, Elizabeth is exemplifying an approach that may find a willingness to listen - or at least seed to possibility of questioning an accepted certainty, or emotionally invested  commitment.

As soon as we engage in our own moral judgement of others - rather than illuminate the questionable, fraudulent or destructive behaviour of others, we muddy our own signal  by using it to get satisfaction of an emotional charge dump - and often with the signal smugness of believing that just for now, we put them in their place!

Much of the pharmaceutical and perhaps all of the 'biological' or vaccination issue rests on a model of disease as pathogenically CAUSED by microbiota and viruses, along with a model of immunity as a battle set against such malign 'hijackers'.

A cat and mouse game between system and hacker operates the progressive lockdown and lock-in of the user. By the way - the Internet is essential for the implementation and maintaining and normalising of lockdown and lockstepping compliance.

'Where Do You Want To Go Today?' said the Spider to the fly.

How far upstream to the cascade of symptoms and whack-a-mole displacement effects are we willing to question?

Within any issue is the liability to become define by what you oppose, resist or disagree with - sometimes quite invisibly. That's why the information we need to take our next step is often hidden in or behind the forms of what we deny, or hold anathema.

Malcolm X is quoted to have said: “I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I'm a human being, first and foremost, and as such I'm for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.”

Identity investments will absolutely block and lock in a negative confirmation bias. Such that if someone or something representative of what you are against says it - it MUST be a matter of opposition and ridicule.

It isn't the rich who cant let themselves into heaven, but those who mistake their identity-investment as riches set over truth.