Prediction Based On Feared Causes

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/01/02/what-causes-heart-disease-part-60-prediction/

Predictions based on 'if you carry on doing x then the logical outcome - all else being equal' - is y - are a direct recognition of cause and effect as effectively one thing. And so - if y is not our desire, we no longer persist in x, but find something better to do.

Prediction based on feared causes, tend to propagate the fears into new forms that further dissociate cause and effect - to make effects into new vectors of 'cause' for a new cascade of (side) effects.

My recent explorations of buteyko claims - overbreathing as a persistent stressor and CO2 depletion - links up with Gerald Pollack, Gilbert Ling, and Raymond Peat and others in the ideas of depletion of energy potentials at rest, fatigue, loss of ability to repair rising from acquired and inherited identity under threat - as a persistent 'fight or flight' bio-chemical response - which itself enervates and expresses in all manner of degradation of cellular, organ, brain and of course social function - which all feeds back on itself as a negative self reinforcement.

So of course endocan along with all other players in the Cast and Chorus of an almost infinitely complex coordination we might call the body (though it is always an expression of its environment and not a closed system - or agent - any more than endocan).

I can safely predict the degradation and destruction of human civilisation and indeed human consciousness if we persist in doing x. However, the word safe doesn't save the doomsayer if he (I) also persist in x. 

To be able to say 'I told you so' by getting sick or dying is not really a victory over life. 

I notice that uniqueness is a signature quality of living beings and so I see that even in negative outcomes, we express unique versions of perhaps similar forms of expression. In this respect I am willing to buck the trend by staying open to all things not being equal, in that there are other variables that are not in our algorithms that can also open new light on why we persist in doing x, so as to shift more fundamentally - rather than trying to manipulate surface factors.

One of my curiosities now is the true role of CO2 in our health. If it is being demonised by the global MSM machine, then it has to have something worthy. Bringing the worthy down is NOT a way to rise in stature - but can serve to hide the contrast.