The Ideal Of Science Is Not Lived By Those Who Practice It

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/01/02/what-causes-heart-disease-part-60-prediction/?replytocom=114707#respond 

The ideal of science is not the reality of the people who engage in science for many and different purposes than the uncovering of the already true as a shared perspective reality (my 'ideal' for science'). And so of course you have an embodiment or expression of self conflicted forces that are by no means a unified purpose and often at odds with the 'face value' presentation as science. Politics underneath all else is about power. Is it naive to think that science (scientists) would be allowed to discover and share anything that undermines the established powers - unless such power was confident in adding it to their range of possession and control?

Or that where it cant be blocked, it would not soon be subverted or contained?

Greed is a drive for more under fear of loss that is never enough - and relates to any sense of self-inflation or aggrandisement and not merely money.

Such is the nature of the instrument or the liability to identify with and become defined by our tools. The carrot of progress has an underside of devaluing or distorting our past. Without a unified goal, 'progress' can be the development of better ways by which to poison and destroy our world or lead it into debt or capture the mind in complex psychologically targeted manipulations. Whose agenda? healthcare or sickness management is a captured revenue stream. Money and funding is the flow of nutrient to the structures that need it to run. But if it doesn't protect and extend existing cartels of profit - it is starved of political focus, funding or even legitimacy/legality.

As long as we persist in giving allegiance and support to a system that is NOT really being run for our Good - then it can persist in the masking of doing so. Of course there are many people within the sickness care system who work with high integrity to do their best with what they have and what they can within their training. 

To renew, one has to abandon a bad investment, and engage beginner's mind. The current model lends itself or is an expression of the desire to escape or abnegate self-responsibility. Of course we do what we can with what we have - but our mechanistic model is a throwback to anti-psychism of replacing vitalism with 'mere' electricity'. The actual nature of an Electric Universe - that extends from the atom to the galactic and the biological to the psychic, is in some ways extremely subtle - but also out of the range of expectation to a 'separate things' sense of control or attempt to control its environment (at all levels).

the idea of self-in-itself is the perception of thing-in-itself and thus of a fragmented chaos that all the king’s horsepower and all the king's human resources cannot put together again. What's more, the structures of the attempt to do so have become invested in ensuring that Humpty stays sick or lives as a risk for sickness requiring constant 'medical oversights and interventions or preemptive sacrifice.