Willing Slavery Or Willing Freedom?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

Yes. This issue reveals itself as being simply a matter of willing slavery or wiling freedom. But however you are moved to choose, it takes two to tango. Freedom has to move beyond the seemingly protective and dependable realm of 'ruled' thoughts to a more integrative relation and appreciation of the whole being.

That 'define and control' should be turned as a weapon against members of its on kind is of course un-kinding, war, or 'evil' in the mind of laws that hold for the true protection of life.

That a few should take unto themselves the right to decide and develop the development or discarding of human attributes lies of course in them being given the power to do so by the laws not only of state, but of the mind by which the subjects think. 

The idea of protection is one with the idea of threat and fear and is used to capture the allegiance and compliance or sacrifice of life-force to the 'power' that grants life - or indeed 'social credit' as to be applied under a more tightly regulated system of terms and conditions.

Unwillingness to slavery (at either pole of its expression), is the need to call upon and align in a true and full resource that has been significantly discarded or substituted for, by a system of collectivism operating as the justification for un-kinding to life by subversion and absorption to a quantified, and programmed, data set of conditions and 'responses' (sic).

Many are increasingly to become aware that they are essentially willing participants to their own degradation and extermination - perhaps made easier by delivering others to such a fate under false premise, so as to secure a temporary status of a relative privilege or protection.

Having developed 'thinking' to such a specialised tool, can we recognise and release its peculiar liability of rendering life as a dead or degraded thing to be upgraded, replaced and discarded.

Thinking can make the box that you die in - or rather, the box in which we see the death of the promise and potentials of life on Earth while thinking to save each our own apart - collectively!

If the reader does not understand, it is because their very thinking is predicated on not understanding this - and such a predicate IS the 'shutting down' of the freedom to question thought or of the enquiring and uncovering of the realisations of the Life, Mind, and Purpose of which we truly are - knowingly so, or otherwise.

A Comment On Corruption

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/

A lot of it is systemic I believe - though I also accept the term 'medical mafia' - but few realise the system they operate FROM. Because its premises or presumptions are internalised and ritually reinforced. Once an idea has ben internalised it almost has a life of its own - and a protected status. We usually don't call it anything because its the 'world' implicit in our actions, thoughts and communications.

This comes under:

Easier to deceive (or persist in the official illusion) than to get anyone to accept they are deceived. Anything assigned status of self-protection is defended against threat. Even a protection racket. Do people know what they do? And if they frame it in justifications or relative merits - or evils - they may still regard themselves as not responsible for what the system - as they see it - dictates or permits (what they get away with as normal).

Systemic thinking is often a replacement for relational intelligence - hence a prescribing robot is surely in the pipeline. And serving a control agenda under threat - ie scarcity driven reductionism.

Monopolistic market capture generates scarcity as its business model - after opening and preparing the market. Rockefeller et al were way to big to hold accountable by US Gov and that was way back. But systemic thinking is vulnerable or simply hackable by fraud.

Enemy of the State

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

Technology (incl 5G) is an arms race - beneath the mask of progress for the Human Good - and the fear than others will get there first leads to pre-emptive strikes.

The Malthusian motif is very fitting to a wide spectrum of social engineering by stealth and guile.

People who don't think like that don't find it easy to accept there are those who do - and act on it in a progressive unfolding or making a new world order - though so much is so destructive that I wonder if some deeper hatred of life simply thrives on breaking down anything it hates and yet is never appeased because life is still here.

A movie called Enemy of the State was either prescient or conditioning us. It has a very funny NSA surveliance moment - I wont spoil. But inflatable tanks and the like are standard kit in the use of deceiving the target to feel more outgunned than they in fact are. Snowden may be a hero or an amazingly clever psyop. The test might be in what your heart chooses to live from rather than setting the mind in an either/or. Don't believe just because it looks and sounds convincing - feel for the green light of an inner resonance. 

I do see that amazing stupid moves seem to be extremely effective at controlling a narrative while leading people to both feed it by giving it attention and currency of focus - while feeling superior because its is so impossible to miss as a target.

Desperate times methinks call up desperate measures by the manipulative to induce others to sustain the unsustainable. War on carbon life forms here we go...

An Internment of Things beckons. Lord of the Internment of Things ... That rings a bell.

My sense is that trending data is marketable and sought as insider information. Not individual behaviours - unless of course you become a elevated to a risk or threat status according to algorythms and  are assigned some overview of a more snoopy kind which still may be automated to collect a readout for a human operator - who may not be as motivated as incentivised and lastly if you are really a 'threat' or chosen as an asset or proxy - then you might have a team monitoring and logging your every fart.

Disinformation By Contagion

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=148055#respond 

Commeter:

Very interesting article here concerning antibody suppression after measles infection, which you have mentioned. Seems we need have no fear, and that this is a good thing the body does in its infinite wisdom. Let me know what you think.

http://www.tetyanaobukhanych.com/blog/should-you-be-afraid-that-measles-gives-you-immune-amnesia

in response to the themes above:

The PR running from the study on Measles 'undermining immunity' is a weaponised headline with apparently supporting text. If you find any journalist doing any job of checking or even engaging with the articles they copy paste - let me know.

I went to the study and skimmed it.

Does one laugh or cry?

Bankers and lawyers and scientists are trained to repackage toxic debt (consequence of their acts) into something they can induce others to buy.

Is there an online translator for language intended to obfuscate?

I agree with your link and with Thomas Cowan in that immunity is not what we think it is (or are told to accept it to be), and so there is an extension of a flawed model or actively believed hypothesis that the study suffers by inheritance.

Then there is the sample size from which to derive such dramatic conclusions - single figures appeared later that didn't correlate to the several hundred at the opening??

The dubious nature of the control group given flu vaccine??

I'm sure Malcolm could make a shortlist of flaws, misrepresentations or weaknesses - but I would rather he educate others in practicing doing so.

If there is substance to argument it can come out unafraid of being challenged - indeed it should welcome any critical perspective so as NOT to deal in misinformation unwittingly.

By challenge I don't mean ad-hom and smear tactics.

Easier to steal the gold in Fort Knox than bring vaccine science to a true accountability - although I have my doubts that there is any in there.

Good to mention the overall death by any cause figure.

I regard a study as false until demonstrated otherwise.

Particularly when selected and weaponised to protect such overwhelmingly powerful vested interests.

'They' are insistent on wanting mandatory vaccination on humans as legally enshrined and protected. It has nothing to do with caring - excepting to manipulate the sympathies of those who do. 

Otherwise why hide from Science and why deny open and honouring relational debate and education? Many NEED to believe they are 100% right in this because if they are wrong they are complicit in a horrifying abuse of trust. That's one reason to have 'Science' - to thoroughly check that what we think is so - is truly as we think - or not. If there is any reasonable doubt - don't force it on anyone by law or by incentivised coercion - such as vaccinate or take your kids out of school.  But if 'they' are right because they say so and because you have no say, then you KNOW the nature of what is wearing the white coat, the banker's suit, the political office, or the environmental concern. 

You may not be able to always deny vaccinations against your will or any other physical or medical or psychological abuse. But you can align with immunity to deceit by loving truth and letting the rest go.

I was sad to see BBCH (BUILDING BRIDGES IN CHILDREN’S HEALTH) - in your linked article - costing £100 p.a - but I suppose it is for professionals and not the laity...

PS IF Measles CAN reset secondary immunity relating to past exposures it may be very useful as a treatment for people with dysfunctional immune responses?

Do we die from the 'disease' or from our defences...?

Repeating the Big Lie...

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/#comment-146069 

Repeating the Big Lie...

“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”

~ Alan Bullock, in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives

Another relevant quote is Mark Twain; "it is easier to deceive than it is to convince people they have been deceived". The corollary is that those who wake to the deceit are often very angry - and where the deceit is part of wrecking children's lives - enraged. Del Bigtree is of the US cultural 'TV show' mentality - it doesn't suit the English psyche - well not mine anyway.  Wakefield is very measured and communicates clearly.

Kennedy deserves subtitles. He is very level headed regardless to emotional nature of human experimentation carried out without scientific transparency and accountability.

After Nazism took ALL the can for eugenics and inhuman genocides the Nuremberg trials resulted in laws being passed against medical experimentation in living human beings without informed consent. Mandatory vaccination breaks those laws and is entirely consistent with Nazism - although there are many post Nazi examples of other such coercive behaviour in the US and doubtless around the world.

The underlying beliefs associated with vaccination are a religion - that is they are placed outside the scope of independent scientific enquiry and open public debate. Anyone trained medically learns what NOT to say or that going there is hazardous to their career.

The same may soon be true of 'climate politics'. This is nothing to do with science and everything to do with the power to persist in asserting a narrative control - ie the Big Lie is repeated and woven into any and every kind of 'news, article or study'. You are hopelessly naive in your trust in the media or medical profession's capacity to give true witness. But then you are spared the emotional turmoil of knowing what goes on beneath appearances.

A Mind As If Split From Its Body And World, Set Within Its Own Tale-Spin

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/09/what-causes-heart-disease-a-summary/

Why stop at damage to the endothelium? Why not address 'damage' or degradation of the blood? Perhaps significant but if Pollack is as reproducibly proven in his EZ water demonstrations - as also applies in cells and arteries - along with all protein-activated phase changes - then is this vicinal (endothelial) charge-gradient a factor? I cant see why NOT.

Vit C and other antioxidants are supply of free electrons - yes?

My interest is in a recognition of our Universe and therefore our life - as having an electrical nature that then operates as complex self-organising Open 'system' of balanced energies, structure and in our case consciousness - excepting that you might say we have lost our balance in terms of a mind that is as if split from its body and Universe and set within its own tale-spin - as a negatively polarised or fear-defined sense of self and world. And somewhat invisibly so in a society of mutual reinforcement.

I am certain that shocks in life or trauma - can and does 'store' in the body in various ways and places - and can be reactivated or triggered by all manner of events.

Persistent as well as acute toxicity is also a shock.

As one who has experience in opening the consciousness (and also of experiencing trauma), I see a normalisation of fear that is otherwise invisible. Any unresolved issues can seek magical remedy in displacements that cannot address the cause but can and will bring all the elements of the original issue into the arena of the 'cure'. Who is listening?

How much attention is given to the truth of love in gosh knows how many pages and comments on CVD - Heart disease. It is in these pages and comments but 

Science tends to operate behind the scenes - in theory of mechanism - where people mostly live front-end user interface generated by currently accepted narrative identity that may base itself on such theories - which are hardly settled Fact an more than theologies.

While many are re-educating themselves after realising a lot of such is more of a top down 'economy' if not racket than a true service - most haven a basis from which to start and grow confidence - and so its a matter of which 'experts' to follow. However, intuition comes into this and there is a difference between those who risk their career or peer credibility in aligning in integrity as they find it relative to following a 'standard of care' that is backed by trillion dollar marketing companies - except to the layman - billion dollar research would find a cure if there was one - ergo - there isn't one - but its in the pipeline - just keep the funds coming.

I don't know that Jerome will reach many who are not already in a sense on board with the 'anti-statin insurgency'. I use that term after reading a paper at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.02103.pdf

Titled: Health Wars and Beyond: The Rapidly Expanding and Efficient Network Insurgency Interlinking Local and Global Online Crowds of Distrust.

Re-education is not just facts' but growing consciousness as to the way to gather and the purpose of application of what is uncovered and currently accepted as a basis from which to live -  while always open to further insight. A 'narrative identity' is generally a 'For and Against' sense of self that is generally For whatever supports Against. This is a blind binary polarisation that cannot  really think at all. When there is no life being lived and shared, what is not used fades by non use - and what is resisted persists.

Electric Heartbeat

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

 I realise I might be repeating an old question already answered somewhere in the last fifty something blog posts but in considering the very basic elements of death by heart failure, I see this whole argument being one of a faulty plumbing system - albeit a self repairing one.

Is it considered that the heart fails because a blockage in the arteries stops the blood flow and starves all organs including the heart of energy to maintain function?

I have read that many who die of a 'heart attack' are found without such blockages' and many who die of other causes are found to have such blockages.

The heart is electrical in its operation and communicates electro-magnetic field potentials - which is how the heart function can be electrically recorded by a cardiogram. There are also heart diseases associated with electrical failure of the heart. Electrical fluctuations in our atmosheric conditions as a result of Solar activity are known to have correspondence with heart 'attacks' whether via block or by interference in the tock of its clock - or pacemaker cells.

So is the blockage itself the cause of death or are their other factors that often or almost always accompany it? The heart stops - but is that because a spanner is in the pump?

Science often specialises and begins to suggest that life happens in different compartments and every specialist defends their field against intrusion by other fields. This pattern is itself not unique to science but a specialisation of a human tendency or mental sense of control.

Science as a technologism of 'define in order to predict and control' can and does serve compartmentalised or private agenda at expense of the whole.

I have a sense that the heart is in some sense a like a conductor to its orchestra,for a synchrony of functional communication, regulation and exchange. I also have a sense that victorian science - like lead plumbing, remains in place at the cost of more integrative understandings as a primitive makeover on older superstitions that persist in an Emperor's new clothing that cannot be questioned without self-invalidating. Not that thermodynamics is not capable of  explaining and accounting for a lot of practical mechanism in physics and in biology - but that there is a contextual layer that it is blind to in the realm of electromagnetic self organising fields of communication that are not themselves physical so much as interfacing qualities to quantities and vice versa and that a primary aspect of renewal, support, immunity, vitality, inspiration, energy and joy in living and sharing life is a connectivity at all levels.

The physical experience is not a risk of death so much as having death built in by design in support of life. But note the phrase physical experience combines two orders of reality within the quality and qualities of life. We also have non-physical experience of imagination and thought that if we observed our self in any day, occupies us more than our real-time relational environment. We live IN our model or image of reality as part of our survival in the body and can and do identify our survival with the image or model and not just the body - and can and do die or sicken as a result of shocks relative to experience of fears, threats and attacks or losses to our self as worldview and ability or acceptability and inclusion.

All kinds of self strategy against personal loss of face, power, status or social inclusion operate the complexities of human manipulative intent and thus of politics in all spheres of life including medical science as a funded institutional identity seeking its own survival in such terms.

Toxicity can be an ignorance - no one knew asbestos was deadly - but when they did the powers that be looked the other way and made it a toxicity by negligence and design - knowingly persisting in deadly hazards for the unwitting until law suits called the tune perhaps. Our world is in many ways toxic relative to dosage and duration - along with resilience and capacity to clear whatever and regain balance or function. Fever is a way the body responds to a toxic shock - but we tend to see fever as the disease - along with the itis and the associated bacterial or virological condition.

Back to heavy metal poisoning - is there a reliable affordable way of testing for this? I wonder because these can also be laid down in fats that may then be dormant - until or unless released back into circulation.