Language As A Weapon Of Self-Illusion Or Deceit

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

The issue of language as a weapon of self-illusion or deceit is only marginally addressed by linguistic correctness - according to whichever ruleset is given acceptance.

Perfectly constructed sentences can fill reams and reams or regulations in which carefully concealed payloads, deliver us unto evils by which to lose the right to free speech - for example.

But also the resort to corporately propagated memes by which to seem to be authoritative - has a great deal of 'scientific' non-human co-opting of language.

To probably quote Malcolm Kendrick here "It's all bollocks" - but on the other hand it is heavily invested and coercive bollocks backed both financially and emotionally - as in reputational status, career, social inclusion and support. Soon to be augmented with 'social credits' and carbon debits under an Internment of Things that will surely log the 'vaccine hesitant' as it will the 'subversion-complicit' . We have already made an 'A.I' that has turned against us as our own thinking - and language.

Speak now or forever hold the pieces in some kind of paralysis that cant even be allowed the movement to scream. Ok - forever is a dramatic exaggeration. But in terms of a life-time, there are critical times or times of a critical Choice. Use it or lose it.

You think you have a mind of your own - but do you merely think that your thought is your own or are we being framed, phished and marketised under a mistaken or indeed stolen identity?

On Anti-vax labelling

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

 On 'anti-vax' labelling:

I choose not to vaccinate, but I do not accept the 'anti' or 'denialist' smear of negatively defined intent for myself, or for others who are of like mind. Other people can and will call you whatever they choose to. That is their choice. I live mine.

To define our self in terms of a perceived evil is to give it primacy.

When Jesus says 'resist ye not evil' he didn't mean be a doormat! He meant align wholly in truth - instead of reactively giving focus to what we say we do NOT want and THEN seeking power in its framework. I don't support the idea of vaccination as a safe and effective or optimal way to pre-empt disease - but more importantly, I refuse mandatory or coercive vaccination agenda as violation of core freedoms over our bodies - and on human experimentation - and call for transparency and accountability to independent scientific oversight as to actual efficacies and adversities.

Deceit always tempts us into self-betrayal by emotionally reacting to suggestion. Don't be phished. If we choose the word that we give and receive in alignment with the integrity of our being. Then we are more aligned in witnessing for integrity on behalf of all, rather and aiming at a disintegrity seen in others  as 'enemy' - who then find easy justification in treating us as 'threat'. If vaccination IS so safe and effective - why not open it to scientific verification?

Notice that any crusading War on 'something' - whatever the 'something' is - always works to fund its protection under guise of fighting the good fight or saving the world. This is a funding of energy, support and sacrifice in a focus directed to 'Seek but do NOT find - or promise but do not deliver.

Those who live in self-illusion or wishful and fearful belief, depend on or are driven by fear and division, in self-interest as they define themselves in the frame of fear of loss of possession and control. And we can all find a part of that in our own mind if not in specific behaviours.

So what I call out as vaccine error is set in fear seeking protection, under a lack of scientific veracity, being protected from accountability by globally directed transnational corporate power that has every intention of using vaccines for its agenda - whatever its proponents at various levels may believe that is. Soldiers, generals and politicians all have different narratives - as do the bankers behind the scenes. WHO is really looking after your interests?

The pattern of this kind of thinking has expanded out into a tyranny of pervasive mind control and undermining of natural rights across a spectrum of human endeavour. I put my focus on the underlying pattern of thinking, of which a vaccine agenda is an example. But it is often impossible to get anyone to notice that they are deceived - by the way the belief protects itself with the status of truth and protection. However a dissonance from a groupthink consensus allows others to recognise that are other ways of thinking and seeing - and in that our demeanour will either speak to others of activate their defences.

Belief in vaccination claims to supply immunity by replacing it with external manual managements that have consequences in pain and loss, that escalates as a burden of costs, and yet interprets its  failures as the need to intensify vaccinating - as more and more of them are needing more and more boosters, while denial operates any public willingness to own its own true account or allow independent scientific oversight or corporate liability under the law.

I see a marrying of those who demand protection by rote of belief, and those who present themselves as certainty of protection  - and in their freedom of choice is a larger education in choice and consequence at a more collective level. In other words it may be later generations who have to pick up the consequence of a mistaken policy given authoritative support.

But the 'herd immunity' narrative works to override all individual freedom of consent - informed or otherwise -  for a mandated 'collectivism' under a controlling mandate. This is pernicious and vile in its deceit, and suppresses other approaches with regard to vitality, immunity, nursed fever as a healing that would result from a true education rather than an indoctrination.

Anyone researching history rather than repeated beliefs can immediately uncover that vaccination came AFTER the disease incidence was reduced right down due to sanitation, living conditions, nutrition etc.

With the Internet increasingly being used as the means to erase and remake history we enter an 'Internment of Things' for carbon-units. Humanity will become as able to free itself as any of the animal stock we keep for food - but privilege within the prison is given to those who sell out on their own kind.

However - as I said - giving focus to what we do NOT want can become the way we give it embodiment in spite of and because of our fears. I see a fundamental choice that we each are faced with, that the world's thinking has always worked to keep hidden. 

You have to decide for yourself whether you accept the voice for fear as the framer, driver and determiner of your life. Once you see that that IS what it is, does it speak for You? 

Because the mind is of Mind and is not irrevocably set - the choice to be someone you are NOT, cannot ever become true - but it can represent your refusal to recognise, accept and appreciate who you really are. Fear cannot give you rest - but only a bubble of a seeming escape that will not abide however much is sacrificed for its sustainability.

Eventually the heart gives way under the strain - even if the organ itself persists.

Don't Run With The Man Who Says He's Found The Truth

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/#comment-151006

Don't run with the man who says he's found the truth - but in discovering you are running alongside another in truly shared purpose, the presence of truth reveals itself to the degree we are willing and ready to accept. Truth isn't 'out there' to be possessed and controlled or weaponised - but is rather a contextual transparency in which honest question results honest answer, and so an honourable outcome unfolds from an honourable process of communication or observation and interpretation.

It ought to be evident that the very fact we have a word 'truth' is the sign of its being obscured and rendered 'questionable' rather than the simplicity of an honest question given answer.

Placebo (saline) vaccines would be fairly safe - excepting for any psychological basis for nocebo effect. But of course the ethical issues make this an outrageous suggestion - to vaccine-risk or inefficacy deniers. But this issue is very emotionally polarising - and that means people only change their mind by their own willingness to reconsider what they believe true. For my part any  truth that has to be coercively applied is evidently lacking substance.

I read that infant mortality in the USA is now the lowest among developed nations - but who wants to consider that what their parental instincts are giving priority to as protection, could work the other way? Its unthinkable - horrible - and anyone raising it to such parents will seem horrible and unworthy of a voice. This sort of mind-trap is pervasive to many issues.

But the desire to protect our kids is common to us all, and common ground is the key to opening communication - hence  Robert Kennedy's CHD campaign is FOR scientifically proven safe and effective vaccinations, along with freedom of informed consent regarding medical or biological interventions. This list came through of some of their achievements this year.

https://mailchi.mp/childrenshealthdefense.org/together-we-can-restore-health-to-our-children-and-protect-future-generations

It doesn't help to be right if we only make others wrong.

The wish to be 'right' as a competitive advantage of self-interest is what sets up the problem in the first place.

in response to

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/#comment-151006

AhNotepad:

Janet, others won’t agree, but I think there will never be a safe and effective vaccine because they all use toxicity to hyper stimulate the immune system. Good nutrition and natural selection are the only effective approaches. Even the disease organisms are involved in their own natural selection so it will never end.

Remember the quotation used by Andrew Wakefield, “Follow the man who seeks the truth, run from the man who’s found it”. Those who have found it include most politicians, and dishonest people in the medical world, some of whom have been mentioned frequently on this blog. (Given my first paragraph, it probably includes me. Doh!)

Technologism has 'outsourced' intelligence

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

Technologism has 'outsourced' intelligence such that a dumb terminal can be managed from a 'smart' cloud.

This is literally giving our mind away while being fed one that 'connects us' with goods and services that disconnect us from a truly felt relationship with anyone or anything - including of course the very words and thoughts that we use - and define ourselves by using.

Technologism has usurped Science - by harnessing, fitting and sacrificing it to a private agenda.

In the dumb user - freedom from having to live the responsibility of one's own life and mind - and for the predator the freedom to feed upon the lives of others who give you their life energy in wealth, health or purpose - in exchange for freedom to maintain a social inclusion under a managed or farmed humanity.

Grammar doesn't concern me so much as doublethink - in which meaninglessness masquerades as currency of exchange. When enough people use 'could of' to mean 'could have' - which is merely a mutated spelling of a spoken 'could'av' - it becomes currency to mean the same thing. But no matter how many people say 'healthcare' is still means something pathological.

I wonder how many have any idea of the usurping of our minds by corporo-speak?

Very very few.

Propaganda establishes narrative identity by compliance and conformity such that anyone who can still think in felt meanings becomes dissonant or discordant and requires actual attention and connection to be understood - which is always the road less travelled when the social comfort zone supports being quick to find reasons to NOT bring attention present.

Indeed most of my responses here are denied posting by Malcolm because - I presume - he does not understand them or deems them off topic.

I have pondered this as being his freedom - even if somewhat personally disappointing - and decided to post them as my own freedom to 

https://doctoringthedata.blogspot.com

Apart from a brief note in the 'about' - and in a comment such as this - there is no mention of any exclusion and my own comments have never been a criticism of the work of Dr Malcolm Kendrick nor of the community of commenters - though I may be critical in relation to ideas - such as 'the heart is a pump' ...period.

Self-inclusion lives from a natural belonging and not from a sense of lack and resentment seeking power. The term 'inclusive' has been weaponised to its lowest common denominator. I live a culture of aspiration as an expression of awakening responsibility for my own life rather than giving power to a sense of lack - and to anyone who comes to salve or supply it externally.

However - while the Internet still works - I use it to serve a re education and a sharing in the uncovering of truth - such as we are willing to be found in.

Plastic Words

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/#comment-150963

It is much deeper than that but yes, language and thought shape the mind and the culture of its expression. Weaponised language is the dark arts of obfuscation, diversion and deceit. 'Plastic Words' speaks to this - as does Orwell and others - but while engaged IN the frame of the deceit no one has any free attention to look at it. In fact for many if you try to speak to the condition - will NOT understand you or want to - because they are set in an identity that run them.

The tyranny of words is invisible to the mind that thinks in their frame.

Yesterday I was re-reading a transcript of an interview with the author of 'Plastic Words' (a book that doesn't seem gettable!) - but you can read about it online.

https://www.davidcayley.com/s/Plastic_Words.pdf

Or go to his podcasts page if you prefer to listen.

Weaponisation of words such as 'anti vaxxer', 'denialist' and others operate a switch in the mind that say - 'dirty and disgusting and dangerous' do not engage with'.

Whatever else Corbyn brought to the table, it included as larger recognition of the centrally orchestrated smear campaign of the mainstreamed media. And the weaponisation of racism by its accusation against others.

Power is revealed by what you are not allowed to say and within our own mind - what we are not allowed to think.

OK I got off track there ;-)

But the use of words is the capacity of consciousness to frame questions and explore their unfolding experience. Viz: the denial of consciousness is being entrained to minds that do not know that they do not know - because they run on words of evasion and deceit. We are in a sense erasing our humanity to a status as managed assets, utilities or carbon guilt units.

However - it doesn't necessarily 'win' anyone over if you can present an articulate and cogent argument - if you are denied a voice or a hearing by scapegoating, smear and denial - as is so commonly applied to 'non compliance'. But it can hold a place of true witness and sometimes hold back the lie - as in Tim Noakes case for example - because so many gathered in support to give expert testimony I suspect.

Narrative control is key to power over the otherwise unwilling.

Go deeper - we are all guinea pigs

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=150773#respond 

Go deeper - we are all guinea pigs to vaccinations operating without due scientific oversight of transparency and accountability.

The Samoans have been selected for PR.

What is fact in the reports is hardly made clear or subject to journalism of any scrutiny.

It may be that negative vaccination outcomes are being used to serve the 'anti-vaxxer' propaganda. For using such labels across the mainstream media is propaganda intended to shut down, wall out and make the subject out of bounds. 'Denier' works the same agenda.

The power to set such narrative dictates is the power to enforce it. But the fear of the penalty of pain of loss will operate a trained or conditioned self-censoring that will extend to actively censor others - so as to seek identity or favour from 'power'. 

 “... the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”

~ Alan Bullock

Fear-backed deceit is the block that has to be addressed first. If you think that reason, science, moral appeal or sympathetic support, will win over the mind-set of possession and control, then that sets the frame of your thinking. A 'golden' framing to offset and cast out toxic debts that grow the more we pay them. 

Undermining Old Structure In Order To Make A New World Odour

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/12/03/dr-malcolm-kendrick-deletion-from-wikipedia/#comment-112485 

I have no doubt but that while it serves purpose  'thisism' and 'thatism' will be supported by insider bias against correction or challenge. 'Somethingists are not in themselves important any more than provisionally useful to the social engineering that undermines old structure in order to make a new world odour.

Vegans are no more capable of 'occupying' wikipedia than any other nurtured and supported minority group with a grievance. But wtshtf it is the patsies or proxies who are sacrificed to the mob - (who of course are but cultivated 'populists' working as an energy source for a Trumped up replacement for an eloquent pretence in reasoned argument and discussion - but that's another story).

So my red flag is when people who could know better, propagate the lie by buying into its false flagged framing. What imposition of 'moral guilting' upon others by a minority opinion would be able to stand up and bully, unless it was set up and supported by socially engineered PR across a spectrum of influences? It is such hidden persuaders that set the agenda, and your reaction. In terms of wikipedia it is a weighting of insider support, blind eye or a policy of cooperation with key support networks - that may include gov agencies and corporate entities. So your 'vegans' could as well be GCHQ on your own taxpayer funding protecting the macro 'economy' as well as a vector of population control. I meant that innocently as a means of simply controlling the mind of the masses - but I cant guarantee that The new world audure is not hitting the fan right now.

I called it moral guilting when it is in fact a guilt DUMP. In this game of pass the parcel - I pass on the game. Just refuse to play. Stick to sharing what is worthy rather than trying to bolster a divided sense of self. "Hey - they're all gloating at us over there". No they are not. That's just bollocks. Don't take the bait or treat it as valid currency. Truth doesn't gloat or become true as a result of defeating illusions. It is the substance in which illusions have none.

The politics of manipulative deceit runs on guilt and fear as the back door by which to capture and direct the mind. Its not wrong to have hidden from what we could not face, but it is wrong to dump it on others and attack them for our own projections. This kind of pattern extends into every kind of fake moral manipulation.

Why does no one call out the sly magician? Because they are all watching what they think they are seeing! And if you get wise, he'll add a layer of flattery for you so that you can think you are one up, while being shafted.

There's a flip side to being lied to. It's called wanting to believe it.

If a lone editor with a name including vegan has the power to set the wikipedia agenda, with a bunch of gloating 'vegans', then you can sleep more easily, and get an extra boost of moral bolster from meat as an identity - instead of sustenance within a communion of life that the little mind cannot grasp.

War is being waged on the human population at large

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

Well 'worse than the leading case of death is quite a claim - but you bring out the side I am most interested in and that is awaking self-responsibilty as part of a shared re-education.

We are being framed, induced, nudged, engineered, propagandised and manipulated at every level - and yet much of this has a negative synergy that can make perfect sense to those who see eugenics by stealth as giving people the rope to hang themselves with - while milking the taxpayer (NHS) for farming the sickness - that as you say may be an invented set of risk markers - ie Cholesterol - whose goalposts can be arbitrarily moved - and which persists despite the theory being unsupported by science.

I vote that A&E should be the primary focus of NHS.

Lifestyle choices that are unsustainable (disease inducing) are a captured revenue stream for Big Ag/Pharma.

As for 'Cancer' - you have another hot potato of regulations that are supposed to protect us...

It looks like Lynn Thyer is to be released from jail in France after illegal extradition.

My outgoing MP wrote to ask one of his mates "what is being done to implement GcMAF for cancer sufferers? and "how soon will it be implemented?". The reply ignored the question.

The dirty war is not being waged on the 'sacred cow' of the NHS - though the prospect of parity with the US as part of the breaksit up of Britain and reconfiguring of EU is extremely ugly. It is being waged on the human population at large.

Willing Slavery Or Willing Freedom?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

Yes. This issue reveals itself as being simply a matter of willing slavery or wiling freedom. But however you are moved to choose, it takes two to tango. Freedom has to move beyond the seemingly protective and dependable realm of 'ruled' thoughts to a more integrative relation and appreciation of the whole being.

That 'define and control' should be turned as a weapon against members of its on kind is of course un-kinding, war, or 'evil' in the mind of laws that hold for the true protection of life.

That a few should take unto themselves the right to decide and develop the development or discarding of human attributes lies of course in them being given the power to do so by the laws not only of state, but of the mind by which the subjects think. 

The idea of protection is one with the idea of threat and fear and is used to capture the allegiance and compliance or sacrifice of life-force to the 'power' that grants life - or indeed 'social credit' as to be applied under a more tightly regulated system of terms and conditions.

Unwillingness to slavery (at either pole of its expression), is the need to call upon and align in a true and full resource that has been significantly discarded or substituted for, by a system of collectivism operating as the justification for un-kinding to life by subversion and absorption to a quantified, and programmed, data set of conditions and 'responses' (sic).

Many are increasingly to become aware that they are essentially willing participants to their own degradation and extermination - perhaps made easier by delivering others to such a fate under false premise, so as to secure a temporary status of a relative privilege or protection.

Having developed 'thinking' to such a specialised tool, can we recognise and release its peculiar liability of rendering life as a dead or degraded thing to be upgraded, replaced and discarded.

Thinking can make the box that you die in - or rather, the box in which we see the death of the promise and potentials of life on Earth while thinking to save each our own apart - collectively!

If the reader does not understand, it is because their very thinking is predicated on not understanding this - and such a predicate IS the 'shutting down' of the freedom to question thought or of the enquiring and uncovering of the realisations of the Life, Mind, and Purpose of which we truly are - knowingly so, or otherwise.

A Comment On Corruption

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/

A lot of it is systemic I believe - though I also accept the term 'medical mafia' - but few realise the system they operate FROM. Because its premises or presumptions are internalised and ritually reinforced. Once an idea has ben internalised it almost has a life of its own - and a protected status. We usually don't call it anything because its the 'world' implicit in our actions, thoughts and communications.

This comes under:

Easier to deceive (or persist in the official illusion) than to get anyone to accept they are deceived. Anything assigned status of self-protection is defended against threat. Even a protection racket. Do people know what they do? And if they frame it in justifications or relative merits - or evils - they may still regard themselves as not responsible for what the system - as they see it - dictates or permits (what they get away with as normal).

Systemic thinking is often a replacement for relational intelligence - hence a prescribing robot is surely in the pipeline. And serving a control agenda under threat - ie scarcity driven reductionism.

Monopolistic market capture generates scarcity as its business model - after opening and preparing the market. Rockefeller et al were way to big to hold accountable by US Gov and that was way back. But systemic thinking is vulnerable or simply hackable by fraud.

Enemy of the State

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

Technology (incl 5G) is an arms race - beneath the mask of progress for the Human Good - and the fear than others will get there first leads to pre-emptive strikes.

The Malthusian motif is very fitting to a wide spectrum of social engineering by stealth and guile.

People who don't think like that don't find it easy to accept there are those who do - and act on it in a progressive unfolding or making a new world order - though so much is so destructive that I wonder if some deeper hatred of life simply thrives on breaking down anything it hates and yet is never appeased because life is still here.

A movie called Enemy of the State was either prescient or conditioning us. It has a very funny NSA surveliance moment - I wont spoil. But inflatable tanks and the like are standard kit in the use of deceiving the target to feel more outgunned than they in fact are. Snowden may be a hero or an amazingly clever psyop. The test might be in what your heart chooses to live from rather than setting the mind in an either/or. Don't believe just because it looks and sounds convincing - feel for the green light of an inner resonance. 

I do see that amazing stupid moves seem to be extremely effective at controlling a narrative while leading people to both feed it by giving it attention and currency of focus - while feeling superior because its is so impossible to miss as a target.

Desperate times methinks call up desperate measures by the manipulative to induce others to sustain the unsustainable. War on carbon life forms here we go...

An Internment of Things beckons. Lord of the Internment of Things ... That rings a bell.

My sense is that trending data is marketable and sought as insider information. Not individual behaviours - unless of course you become a elevated to a risk or threat status according to algorythms and  are assigned some overview of a more snoopy kind which still may be automated to collect a readout for a human operator - who may not be as motivated as incentivised and lastly if you are really a 'threat' or chosen as an asset or proxy - then you might have a team monitoring and logging your every fart.

Disinformation By Contagion

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=148055#respond 

Commeter:

Very interesting article here concerning antibody suppression after measles infection, which you have mentioned. Seems we need have no fear, and that this is a good thing the body does in its infinite wisdom. Let me know what you think.

http://www.tetyanaobukhanych.com/blog/should-you-be-afraid-that-measles-gives-you-immune-amnesia

in response to the themes above:

The PR running from the study on Measles 'undermining immunity' is a weaponised headline with apparently supporting text. If you find any journalist doing any job of checking or even engaging with the articles they copy paste - let me know.

I went to the study and skimmed it.

Does one laugh or cry?

Bankers and lawyers and scientists are trained to repackage toxic debt (consequence of their acts) into something they can induce others to buy.

Is there an online translator for language intended to obfuscate?

I agree with your link and with Thomas Cowan in that immunity is not what we think it is (or are told to accept it to be), and so there is an extension of a flawed model or actively believed hypothesis that the study suffers by inheritance.

Then there is the sample size from which to derive such dramatic conclusions - single figures appeared later that didn't correlate to the several hundred at the opening??

The dubious nature of the control group given flu vaccine??

I'm sure Malcolm could make a shortlist of flaws, misrepresentations or weaknesses - but I would rather he educate others in practicing doing so.

If there is substance to argument it can come out unafraid of being challenged - indeed it should welcome any critical perspective so as NOT to deal in misinformation unwittingly.

By challenge I don't mean ad-hom and smear tactics.

Easier to steal the gold in Fort Knox than bring vaccine science to a true accountability - although I have my doubts that there is any in there.

Good to mention the overall death by any cause figure.

I regard a study as false until demonstrated otherwise.

Particularly when selected and weaponised to protect such overwhelmingly powerful vested interests.

'They' are insistent on wanting mandatory vaccination on humans as legally enshrined and protected. It has nothing to do with caring - excepting to manipulate the sympathies of those who do. 

Otherwise why hide from Science and why deny open and honouring relational debate and education? Many NEED to believe they are 100% right in this because if they are wrong they are complicit in a horrifying abuse of trust. That's one reason to have 'Science' - to thoroughly check that what we think is so - is truly as we think - or not. If there is any reasonable doubt - don't force it on anyone by law or by incentivised coercion - such as vaccinate or take your kids out of school.  But if 'they' are right because they say so and because you have no say, then you KNOW the nature of what is wearing the white coat, the banker's suit, the political office, or the environmental concern. 

You may not be able to always deny vaccinations against your will or any other physical or medical or psychological abuse. But you can align with immunity to deceit by loving truth and letting the rest go.

I was sad to see BBCH (BUILDING BRIDGES IN CHILDREN’S HEALTH) - in your linked article - costing £100 p.a - but I suppose it is for professionals and not the laity...

PS IF Measles CAN reset secondary immunity relating to past exposures it may be very useful as a treatment for people with dysfunctional immune responses?

Do we die from the 'disease' or from our defences...?

Repeating the Big Lie...

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/#comment-146069 

Repeating the Big Lie...

“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”

~ Alan Bullock, in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives

Another relevant quote is Mark Twain; "it is easier to deceive than it is to convince people they have been deceived". The corollary is that those who wake to the deceit are often very angry - and where the deceit is part of wrecking children's lives - enraged. Del Bigtree is of the US cultural 'TV show' mentality - it doesn't suit the English psyche - well not mine anyway.  Wakefield is very measured and communicates clearly.

Kennedy deserves subtitles. He is very level headed regardless to emotional nature of human experimentation carried out without scientific transparency and accountability.

After Nazism took ALL the can for eugenics and inhuman genocides the Nuremberg trials resulted in laws being passed against medical experimentation in living human beings without informed consent. Mandatory vaccination breaks those laws and is entirely consistent with Nazism - although there are many post Nazi examples of other such coercive behaviour in the US and doubtless around the world.

The underlying beliefs associated with vaccination are a religion - that is they are placed outside the scope of independent scientific enquiry and open public debate. Anyone trained medically learns what NOT to say or that going there is hazardous to their career.

The same may soon be true of 'climate politics'. This is nothing to do with science and everything to do with the power to persist in asserting a narrative control - ie the Big Lie is repeated and woven into any and every kind of 'news, article or study'. You are hopelessly naive in your trust in the media or medical profession's capacity to give true witness. But then you are spared the emotional turmoil of knowing what goes on beneath appearances.

A Mind As If Split From Its Body And World, Set Within Its Own Tale-Spin

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/09/what-causes-heart-disease-a-summary/

Why stop at damage to the endothelium? Why not address 'damage' or degradation of the blood? Perhaps significant but if Pollack is as reproducibly proven in his EZ water demonstrations - as also applies in cells and arteries - along with all protein-activated phase changes - then is this vicinal (endothelial) charge-gradient a factor? I cant see why NOT.

Vit C and other antioxidants are supply of free electrons - yes?

My interest is in a recognition of our Universe and therefore our life - as having an electrical nature that then operates as complex self-organising Open 'system' of balanced energies, structure and in our case consciousness - excepting that you might say we have lost our balance in terms of a mind that is as if split from its body and Universe and set within its own tale-spin - as a negatively polarised or fear-defined sense of self and world. And somewhat invisibly so in a society of mutual reinforcement.

I am certain that shocks in life or trauma - can and does 'store' in the body in various ways and places - and can be reactivated or triggered by all manner of events.

Persistent as well as acute toxicity is also a shock.

As one who has experience in opening the consciousness (and also of experiencing trauma), I see a normalisation of fear that is otherwise invisible. Any unresolved issues can seek magical remedy in displacements that cannot address the cause but can and will bring all the elements of the original issue into the arena of the 'cure'. Who is listening?

How much attention is given to the truth of love in gosh knows how many pages and comments on CVD - Heart disease. It is in these pages and comments but 

Science tends to operate behind the scenes - in theory of mechanism - where people mostly live front-end user interface generated by currently accepted narrative identity that may base itself on such theories - which are hardly settled Fact an more than theologies.

While many are re-educating themselves after realising a lot of such is more of a top down 'economy' if not racket than a true service - most haven a basis from which to start and grow confidence - and so its a matter of which 'experts' to follow. However, intuition comes into this and there is a difference between those who risk their career or peer credibility in aligning in integrity as they find it relative to following a 'standard of care' that is backed by trillion dollar marketing companies - except to the layman - billion dollar research would find a cure if there was one - ergo - there isn't one - but its in the pipeline - just keep the funds coming.

I don't know that Jerome will reach many who are not already in a sense on board with the 'anti-statin insurgency'. I use that term after reading a paper at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.02103.pdf

Titled: Health Wars and Beyond: The Rapidly Expanding and Efficient Network Insurgency Interlinking Local and Global Online Crowds of Distrust.

Re-education is not just facts' but growing consciousness as to the way to gather and the purpose of application of what is uncovered and currently accepted as a basis from which to live -  while always open to further insight. A 'narrative identity' is generally a 'For and Against' sense of self that is generally For whatever supports Against. This is a blind binary polarisation that cannot  really think at all. When there is no life being lived and shared, what is not used fades by non use - and what is resisted persists.

Electric Heartbeat

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

 I realise I might be repeating an old question already answered somewhere in the last fifty something blog posts but in considering the very basic elements of death by heart failure, I see this whole argument being one of a faulty plumbing system - albeit a self repairing one.

Is it considered that the heart fails because a blockage in the arteries stops the blood flow and starves all organs including the heart of energy to maintain function?

I have read that many who die of a 'heart attack' are found without such blockages' and many who die of other causes are found to have such blockages.

The heart is electrical in its operation and communicates electro-magnetic field potentials - which is how the heart function can be electrically recorded by a cardiogram. There are also heart diseases associated with electrical failure of the heart. Electrical fluctuations in our atmosheric conditions as a result of Solar activity are known to have correspondence with heart 'attacks' whether via block or by interference in the tock of its clock - or pacemaker cells.

So is the blockage itself the cause of death or are their other factors that often or almost always accompany it? The heart stops - but is that because a spanner is in the pump?

Science often specialises and begins to suggest that life happens in different compartments and every specialist defends their field against intrusion by other fields. This pattern is itself not unique to science but a specialisation of a human tendency or mental sense of control.

Science as a technologism of 'define in order to predict and control' can and does serve compartmentalised or private agenda at expense of the whole.

I have a sense that the heart is in some sense a like a conductor to its orchestra,for a synchrony of functional communication, regulation and exchange. I also have a sense that victorian science - like lead plumbing, remains in place at the cost of more integrative understandings as a primitive makeover on older superstitions that persist in an Emperor's new clothing that cannot be questioned without self-invalidating. Not that thermodynamics is not capable of  explaining and accounting for a lot of practical mechanism in physics and in biology - but that there is a contextual layer that it is blind to in the realm of electromagnetic self organising fields of communication that are not themselves physical so much as interfacing qualities to quantities and vice versa and that a primary aspect of renewal, support, immunity, vitality, inspiration, energy and joy in living and sharing life is a connectivity at all levels.

The physical experience is not a risk of death so much as having death built in by design in support of life. But note the phrase physical experience combines two orders of reality within the quality and qualities of life. We also have non-physical experience of imagination and thought that if we observed our self in any day, occupies us more than our real-time relational environment. We live IN our model or image of reality as part of our survival in the body and can and do identify our survival with the image or model and not just the body - and can and do die or sicken as a result of shocks relative to experience of fears, threats and attacks or losses to our self as worldview and ability or acceptability and inclusion.

All kinds of self strategy against personal loss of face, power, status or social inclusion operate the complexities of human manipulative intent and thus of politics in all spheres of life including medical science as a funded institutional identity seeking its own survival in such terms.

Toxicity can be an ignorance - no one knew asbestos was deadly - but when they did the powers that be looked the other way and made it a toxicity by negligence and design - knowingly persisting in deadly hazards for the unwitting until law suits called the tune perhaps. Our world is in many ways toxic relative to dosage and duration - along with resilience and capacity to clear whatever and regain balance or function. Fever is a way the body responds to a toxic shock - but we tend to see fever as the disease - along with the itis and the associated bacterial or virological condition.

Back to heavy metal poisoning - is there a reliable affordable way of testing for this? I wonder because these can also be laid down in fats that may then be dormant - until or unless released back into circulation.

Lead toxicity heart disease

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

Note lead is being used as one of a class of toxic metals - that are also neurotoxic.

So what are the metals or similar-acting toxins that effect either the damage or the interference in the capacity to defend, repair, and renew?

I suggest aluminium is also a candidate. There are a range of other known toxins that I also submit as candidates. I just read the study on pesticides as the most likely cause of 'Havana Syndrome'.

In short toxic exposures are systemic and pervasive with regional variations. Regs on pesticides or any other health protection are either non existent or overridden by multinational corporate agenda. Banned toxins are simply resold in other 'markets'. This includes vaccines known to harm.

But the key theme is that toxicity is built in to our way of life.

You note leaded petrol - eventually phased out but only being used because it was patented - not for any functional necessity. Lead is still in our mains water supply - and some areas have very toxic water. (Flint, Michigan etc).

Much of this in my opinion is a result of centralisation requiring a top down imposition of systemic organisation running on deductive reasoning rather than inductive observations and re-alignment.

In Malcolm's metaphor, control itself is the centre piece of its own framing - as an interjection and substitution for what comes naturally - or rather the way nature actually works.

The establishment of kings, high priesthoods and power class thereof became the model of the self - as a top down control of the self-mind-brain over its body. We have it backwards - but are all in the idea of control over life as something fundamentally threatening, treacherous and opposition to our fantasy of how things should be - and which forms the basis of the ideas we presume and internalise as true that then 'force all the other pieces out of shape'.

Hence restoring our own true shape by releasing the false frame of unquestioned reality that is in fact believed and perceived confirmation bias - allows other pieces to find us as part of a reintegrative wholeness or coherency.

The other side of the story to toxicity is cellular of functional immunity.

How can we be more resilient in our capacity to neutralise and recover from toxic shocks that may be an event running on top of persistent background exposure?

I see this as more than a shopping list of todo's.

And there is huge evidence to suggest that the degradation of human population is by design - sometimes as the 'side effects' of higher profits but also as a more stupid and less troublesome populace and also Malthusian stealth.

Alas, opening to the larger picture can in itself be a factor for heart failure for deep fear, horror or indeed rage can all serve as toxic or inflammatory attack on the body.

I understand that IV vit C - and perhaps other antioxidants - can neutralise the acute risk of fatality from toxic exposures of some kinds.

I also understand that we can die from our defences rather than the attack or problem itself. This has become extrapolated to human society as iatrogenic disease as well as many unexpected effects of solving problems that unwittingly generate new problems by displacement.

Mercury poisoning was once the applied remedy of the 'quicks' those physicians who purged the disease with poisons such as quicksilver, (mercury). This is indeed in the original meaning of pharma as both poison and remedy.

While not advocating the example, there are some who accept potentially poisonous snake bites as part of their Sunday service without dying. There is more going on than meets the eye.

It is my sense that toxicity is the basis of disease and that what we call infection is in fact the body's attempt to heal or clear it. But because we associate infection with pathological (evil) viruses - we have a contagion of fear that generates its own 'defence system' - often to protect the cause (of sickness) by attacking the effects (symptoms interpreted as attack).

Fear can mount on fear to an inflammation of hysterical breakdown of communication - as we are seeing in our current affairs and inability to sanely address them.

So at the least I suggest that there is an inner and and outer part to all these things  but the inner is the art of hiding itself in internalised presumptions of asserted and believed reality.

Calcium does have a necessary role

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/10/05/what-causes-heart-disease-part-66/

But calcium does have a necessary role in its due place and timing does it not?

Calcification is an ossification of rigidity that has its own parallel in human thought and attitude.

I see loss of balance as a summation of disease - including a balance that can hold all manner of  imbalances within itself. Indeed the Universe can be seen as a perfectly balanced disequilibrium in motion. Perhaps finding our right place and timing is finding a dynamic balance point - that of course can never be written out as a prescription or on stone tablets.

We are trying to do much of what the body was designed to do - maintain functional balance or homeostasis. But from an externalised presumption of objectivity by which to then enforce the puzzle to fit our pieces.

Victort of such a system is well represented by a comment overheard in oncology; "Well we lost the patient - but we got the cancer!".

I suppose if humans didn't exist God would have to make them up.

The systems of regulation are hacked. IE Dysregulation. In political terms this is called 'regulatory capture'. Parasites are known to be able to repurpose their host to serve their agenda - and in some sense so is a cancer. What is the condition that attracts and is open to parasitic symbiosis or to the disconnected growth that no longer receives support and operates as its own separate survival without connective communication?

I haven't researched it in any depth but the assertion of the calcification of the pineal gland being the shutting down of a greater field of communication and support in life can be seen as a means maintaining the darkness in which a 'survival response' can persist as a system of control - or parasitic growth at expense of that which gives and shares life.

For want of better words a field of bio-regulation operates at various levels and various speeds - up to the electromagnetic impulses at the speed of light - ie in nanoseconds - across the whole and not as a top down hierarchy of control.

I recall a car sticker: "Designed by computer. built by robots. driven by morons" or something very similar. At some level I see this as part of freedom to be tooled and fooled instead of appreciating and extending the gift. Insofar as the body is a tool what would its function be serving?

(I have sympathy for the idea that the body prefers calcium from the transmutation of silica - which may seem far out but has some support. I also have the idea that pasteurized milk has destroyed the enzymes necessary for the assimilation of its calcium content. However, I have a conscious bias toward anything the mainstream seeks to deny - as a part of the larger picture that doesn't fit because the mind-framing denies it a place.

Psyche-pathy of conflicted premise as Ministry of Health

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=145488#respond 

It isn't just about profits AhNotepad. Globally applied top down mandates by hook and by crook are not about money - excepting as a medium of energy thought and wealth exchange - and then control of money flow is like a tumour's network of its own blood supply.

The ability to set, nurture and farm beliefs is a much more powerful leverage than what automatically proceeds from - or can be easily engineered to proceed from them.

Medical beliefs are not medical - they are beliefs that may or may not be supported by genuine observation, enquiry and research - that even so may be partial or incomplete as a result of inherited or acquired ignorances.

Beliefs always express core archetypal orientations and identifications that have not changed since mythological archetypes developed the human psyche.

Psychopathic gods were the order of the day then. As were voluntary and mandatory sacrifice to the appeasement or ritual re-enactment of the god.

The ability to mandate is the extension of the god through the god-king and elite priesthoods.

War between different competing gods, sets up a network of consolidated power as narrative control - which is an attempt to overlay or impose a unity on an actually conflicted state as the survival of the State. Survival in such terms is a narrative given priority over all else - or indeed a fear believed, operating the suppression of all else - as the sympathetic response hooked to a believed or feared 'reality' rather than a true relational witness or indeed 'with-ness'. And so psycho-pathy in essence is a dissociated belief structure operating AS IF reality by the power we (unknowingly) give it - as our protector and guide.

Truth does not call for the sacrifice of lies - because a lie never has been true. But it is the Call to release investment in them - and there's the rub!

Lies - or false beliefs invested with identity and protection - by definition demand sacrifice of true - and conceal themselves as a mind of self justification - which as we all know is ingenious in capacity to come up with a support story at an instant's notice.

Moral indignation is all very well, but blame operates the scapegoating of our hidden hates onto any associated target so as to deny or kill them - not unlike immune responses - which can be self-directed and fatal. And indulging our emotional reaction feeds into being labelled and framed as  an extremist, mad and dangerous. It is our own template we need to sweep clean - from which to bring a clear witness to the willingness to see and hear it.

Saving Souls became a very bad idea! - But saving our life from coercive deceit is awakening to the capacity to discern ideas through which to share life, instead of identifying IN them as substitute FOR life - and therefore at 'war' with life as self-destructive or meaningless identity - in Psyche-pathy of persisting in conflicted premise as the Ministry of Health, Peace, Truth or any other face of the god set up as a wooden horse.

This is a long range strategy - note:

- - -

The explicit underlying assumptions on which MIT's computer model operated were formulated to create a scenario that would result in a general reduction of living standards of the overall world population, but not, of course, its ruling elites. The study’s director, Jay Forrester, openly declared this in his 1971 book, World Dynamics:

"Rising pressures are necessary to hasten the day when population is stabilized. Pressures can be increased by reducing food production, reducing health services, and reducing industrialization".

- - -

Note that the vectors are achieved by reducing nutritive contents, increasing toxic exposures, including as health care - reducing industrialisation is to be worked by both throttling money supply and the introduction of carbon guilt economy under the IoT.

I took this quote from the latest mailing from William H Engdahl: 'Hidden History of UN Global Warming Politics' - extracted from his 'Myths, Lies and Oil Wars'.

Because the scenario of remaking the world by coercion and deceit is so unthinkable,  our mind recoils - and yet everyone has the wish to make the world fit their ideas - but no more than momentary illusion of the power to do so. But are our collective wishes feeding the embodiment of power to 'lord it over life' - Rather than recognise and align the power within Life?

The 'Big Lie' repeats a very limited extreme statement

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/

The 'Big Lie' idea is to repeat a very limited statement over and over - from the power or leverage of the ability to do so  - is media and key opinion leaders.

Eventually the mass of people are acculturated and acclimatised to take this as IF it were authoritatively proven or a consensus reality. 

Very very few choose to give witness to their integrity when critical of those in power, (positions of leadership and trust), and dissonant to the beliefs and reactions of peer pressured consensus conformity.

Perhaps this developed from 'fronting out' an otherwise invalidating exposure by assertive and aggressive denials that were found to 'work'. This is now normal for politics and pervasive for society. A society of such entanglement in deceits as to suggest a reenactment of the story of the tower of Babel. Communication itself breaks down.

However, this is only the result of the intent and attempt to use communication as a weapon as if to 'Make Reality' and enforce it upon the mind (self and others) - or force the mind to conform and comply...

When the mind is used to mask or hide or deny a true communication of the nature of our being, it generates a negatively reinforcing and destructive identification. A lie believed true, must seek its own sustainability by deceit so as to frame your life in ITS terms so as to maintain allegiance of funding and belief. This is exemplified in the 'bankers' ability to repackage toxic debt in complex instruments of financially attractive investments. Ingenuity is hired, trained and tooled to serve a 'dalek's eye view' as a merit of technical achievement finding reward.

No debate or discussion will be allowed unless as some sort of show trial. This presentation of 'communication' is unworthy of engaging with as communication - but more for what it reveals of the intent to deny it. I understand that everyone seeks to evade pain of loss - but not by exporting our own rightful consequence onto others via the manipulation of their fears and sympathies.

However, the responsibility for what we accept true by then acting as if it is true, remains with us as our own freedom of choice and experience. No one knows freedom under a tyrannous frame of compulsion. Questioning and evaluating any experience of reality is our natural inherence. Mind as a robotic obedience under fear's dictate is the loss of the integrative will to live. And so it is a 'death wish' running as a negative economy and NOT the willingness to embrace and cherish Life on Earth.

Releasing baggage is the idea of no longer carrying or attempting to justify that which does not truly belong. In any case the body as we know it does not 'survive' - being a world of constant change. But surviving is also not an end in itself to which everything else must forever be subjugated and sacrificed to. The mind of fear is the means of the sustainability of fear, at cost of a truly felt or connected and integrative awareness.

Panaceas invite every form of ill or evil to align within their wish. The eradication of evil is an ancient reflex that makes a wishful evasion, escape or separation by its attempt. A true resolution zooms out or rises to a more inclusive perspective in which we are no longer framed, besieged or   victim to subjugation and suffering - even if our willingness to let go the false security of 'controlled chaos' is found one step at a time.